Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 上海【蕉点】人气榜

Channel

上海【蕉点】人气榜

@shjdtop

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,490subscribers

+3,513 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006918013
TypeChannel
Username@shjdtop
Description👏欢迎来上海蕉点: 💬 唯一管理: @sh555 🤖 上课助手: @SHjiaodianzy_bot ———————————- ✔️上海蕉点 · 群组目录 🍌蕉友大群: @SHjdqun 🎖老师总榜: @SHjiaodian 🎖好评榜单: @SHjdtop 🔋出勤榜单: @Shjdcq 🗺地区导航: @SHjdzl 🔖作业反馈: @SHjdzy ❤️一键关注所有频道: https://t.me/addlist/9zm9sHrfUp85OTlh
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shjdtop

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,97521,53419,754.56 August 2026 — 17,977 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,983 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,040 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,975 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,348 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,470 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,542 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,505 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,712 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,843 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,897 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,822 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,896 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,996 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,936 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,023 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,116 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,989 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,030 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,053 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,185 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,252 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,248 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,468 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,637 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,789 subscribers8 September 2026 — 20,155 subscribers11 September 2026 — 20,502 subscribers13 September 2026 — 20,652 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,820 subscribers16 September 2026 — 20,963 subscribers19 September 2026 — 21,534 subscribers25 September 2026 — 21,490 subscribers21,4906 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net +3,513. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,441–22,068 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 15:5821,490-44
19 Sept 2026, 00:1921,534+571
16 Sept 2026, 14:2120,963+143
14 Sept 2026, 20:0120,820+168
13 Sept 2026, 03:2120,652+150
11 Sept 2026, 08:4020,502+347
8 Sept 2026, 15:2020,155+366
5 Sept 2026, 09:1619,789+152
3 Sept 2026, 09:5819,637+169
2 Sept 2026, 04:0319,468+220
1 Sept 2026, 04:1819,248-4
31 Aug 2026, 07:0619,252+67
30 Aug 2026, 08:2419,185+132
29 Aug 2026, 05:0519,053+23
28 Aug 2026, 01:4719,030+41
27 Aug 2026, 02:5518,989-127
26 Aug 2026, 06:2219,116+93
25 Aug 2026, 05:3419,023+87
24 Aug 2026, 02:5618,936-60
22 Aug 2026, 07:4618,996first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.3%
avg views ÷ 21,490 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.069%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held36 (1 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total24,425
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,540
Videos
≈280
Links
≈233

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 25 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤56100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC495 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

甜甜 #浦东 | 陕西小萝莉 1000P- 1800PP 🛫 @ovott_678(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(18) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:是一个陕西的萝莉小妹妹,有多位狼友反馈都不错,该有的服务都有,态度良好,嫩妹爱好者放心约课。

❤1

26 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,240 views0 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

兔子牙 #黄埔 | 宝藏女友型 1100p—2000PP 🛫 @tian_oyo(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(26) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说: 妹妹绝非流水线式的死板服务,而是让人意犹未尽的“宝藏女友型”体验。无论是想享受初恋般的甜蜜,还是追求水乳交融的快感,兔子牙妹妹都绝对值得无限回购! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

25 Sept 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,840 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

小不点 #浦东 | 可爱小妹妹 700p—1100PP 🛫 @xbd5252 (备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(15) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:是一名服务系的可爱小妹妹,服务没的挑,态度也不错,是一位非常骚气的妹妹,值得去体验去开发。

❤1

24 Sept 2026, 06:10 UTC≈2,200 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

亿涵 #浦东 | 大学生嫩妹 1000p—1800PP 🛫 @yihan311 (备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(15) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:亿涵 最难得的是不仅颜值身材在线,细节与卫生更是做到了极致:一次性用品齐全、环境干净整洁,安全感满满。极力推荐!”⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

❤1

23 Sept 2026, 06:13 UTC≈3,010 views0 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

冰冰 #静安 | 性价比御姐 800P—1500PP 🛫@bingxiaobing(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(9) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:有老哥约课后给了一句肯定的话,是一次流连忘返的体验,性价比非常高的一位御姐型妹妹。

22 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,000 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

安安 #徐汇 | 服务系高颜值 900P—1600PP 🛫 @anan241108(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(21) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹性价比非常高,属于服务系里的高颜值,归属于御姐类别,喜欢御姐类型的可以无脑冲。

❤3

2 Sept 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

婉茹 #宝山 | 性价比小萝莉 600P- 1000PP 🛫 @jiangxiaobaiya(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(23) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:不要看价钱便宜,但是妹妹还是小萝莉,具备非常高的性价比,服务也没得说,水多、态度好。

1 Sept 2026, 03:41 UTC≈2,390 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

点点 #浦东 | 极致性价比 700P- 1100PP 🛫 @Sh77dd77(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(18) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹是一位非常有职业素养老师,非常的卖力认真,按摩手法一流,给你一种领家少妇的感觉。

31 Aug 2026, 02:21 UTC≈2,880 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

骚气小狂魔 #徐汇 | 情绪价值 800P- 1400PP 🛫 @xkm88881(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(14) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说: 通过老哥们反馈,妹妹在800的档这个价位来说,就是御姐天花板,非常的骚气,是一个小话唠。

❤4

30 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈2,850 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

懒羊羊 #长宁 | 清纯嫩妹 1000P-1800PP 🛫 @lanyy0802(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(16) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹浑身散发着青春的气息,样貌、服务都是非常的哇塞。

❤2

29 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC≈2,990 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

火火 #浦东 | 服务系妹妹 700P-1200PP 🛫 @huohuo1919(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(44) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:火火妹妹的人气就跟名字一样,红红火火,在服务系来说,火火妹妹应该属于第一梯队,服务态度都没得说,放心出击不踩坑。

28 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC≈2,670 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

秀儿 #浦东 | 人照一致 1000P-1500PP 🛫 @xiuer6699(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(17) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:约课秀儿妹妹的都说是完美约课,服务没的说,人照一致,情绪价值拉满,主打就是真实。

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @shjdtop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“上海【蕉点】人气榜” (@shjdtop), 21,490 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shjdtop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.