Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

上海【蕉点】人气榜

@shjdtop

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,470subscribers

+493 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002006918013
TypeChannel
Username@shjdtop
Description👏欢迎来上海蕉点: 💬 唯一管理: @sh555 🤖 上课助手: @SHjiaodianzy_bot ———————————- ✔️上海蕉点 · 群组目录 🍌蕉友大群: @SHjdqun 🎖老师总榜: @SHjiaodian 🎖好评榜单: @SHjdtop 🔋出勤榜单: @Shjdcq 🗺地区导航: @SHjdzl 🔖作业反馈: @SHjdzy ❤️一键关注所有频道: https://t.me/addlist/9zm9sHrfUp85OTlh
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/shjdtop

Growth

17,97518,47018,222.56 August 2026 — 17,977 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,983 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,040 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,975 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,075 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,348 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,470 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +493. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,901–18,544 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:2318,470+122
11 Aug 2026, 20:1318,348+273
10 Aug 2026, 19:1318,075+100
9 Aug 2026, 18:4217,975-65
8 Aug 2026, 21:3718,040+57
7 Aug 2026, 19:3017,983+6
6 Aug 2026, 20:1617,977first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 18,470 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,870
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.078%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held11 (1 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total20,530
Reactions total15
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,540
Videos
293
Links
221

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC≈1,050 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

依依 #徐汇 | 极致性价比 700P—1300PP 🛫 @xiaoyiyixx(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(19) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:据说是一个热爱健身的妹妹,这个价位是非常具有性价比,有的狼友能连续两天找妹妹约课,充分说明妹妹的服务非常的到位。

1

11 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC≈1,440 views0 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

可可 #静安 | 人工白虎嫩妹 1200P—1800PP 🛫 @kekeke9537(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(21) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹是一位可爱,说话甜美的小嫩妹,据说是人工白虎,三点粉,服务非常的哇塞,让人体验了一次还想体验第二次的邻家小妹。

10 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,640 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

嘉嘉 #闵行 | 领家女孩 800P—1500PP 🛫 @jiajiahh588(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(12) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:嘉嘉是一位非常体贴的小嫩妹,约过课的反馈都是很满意,有几个狼友都复刷了妹妹。值得推荐!!

2

9 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

小海豚 #浦东 | 颜值系御姐 1500P—2300PP 🛫 @xxxx9288(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(10) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:颜值是没的说,教室环境是江景房,妹妹非常的主动热情,情绪价值给你拉满,值得推荐。

8 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC≈2,140 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

团子 #黄埔 | 特色抓龙筋 499-599-799 🛫 @weizlj(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(09) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:整体轻松愉快,适合放松休息,环境比较安静,老师的手法娴熟!值得体验。

1

7 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC≈1,560 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

懒羊羊 #长宁 | 清纯嫩妹 100P-1800PP 🛫 @lanyy0802(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(15) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹浑身散发着青春的气息,样貌、服务都是非常的哇塞。

6 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈2,000 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

火火 #浦东 | 服务系妹妹 700P-1200PP 🛫 @huohuo1919(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(43) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:火火妹妹的人气就跟名字一样,红红火火,在服务系来说,火火妹妹应该属于第一梯队,服务态度都没得说,放心出击不踩坑。

3

5 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈2,150 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

静静 #普陀 | 极致性价比 550P- 650PP 🛫 @meiguixxx(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(30) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:对于这个价位来说,第一反应应该是服务跟不上,但是通过反馈来看,这个价位来说服务还是蛮不错的,还能提供情绪价值。值得体验。

2

3 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC≈2,410 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

白羊 #闵行 | 颜值系嫩妹 1100P- 1800PP 🛫 @baiyang0102(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(12) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹是一个颜值系长腿妹妹,服务没的说,颜值没得挑,约课后包满意的那一种。

3

2 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,360 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

婉茹 #宝山 | 性价比小萝莉 600P- 1000PP 🛫 @jiangxiaobaiya(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(19) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:不要看价钱便宜,但是妹妹还是小萝莉,具备非常高的性价比,服务也没得说,水多、态度好。

1

1 Aug 2026, 05:57 UTC≈2,420 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

点点 #浦东 | 极致性价比 700P- 1100PP 🛫 @Sh77dd77(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(18) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹是一位非常有职业素养老师,非常的卖力认真,按摩手法一流,给你一种领家少妇的感觉。

2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @shjdtop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,798 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“上海【蕉点】人气榜” (@shjdtop), 18,470 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shjdtop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.