甜甜 #浦东 | 陕西小萝莉 1000P- 1800PP 🛫 @ovott_678(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(18) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:是一个陕西的萝莉小妹妹,有多位狼友反馈都不错,该有的服务都有,态度良好,嫩妹爱好者放心约课。
❤1

Channel
@shjdtop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,490subscribers
+3,513 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002006918013 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shjdtop |
| Description | 👏欢迎来上海蕉点: 💬 唯一管理: @sh555 🤖 上课助手: @SHjiaodianzy_bot ———————————- ✔️上海蕉点 · 群组目录 🍌蕉友大群: @SHjdqun 🎖老师总榜: @SHjiaodian 🎖好评榜单: @SHjdtop 🔋出勤榜单: @Shjdcq 🗺地区导航: @SHjdzl 🔖作业反馈: @SHjdzy ❤️一键关注所有频道: https://t.me/addlist/9zm9sHrfUp85OTlh |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shjdtop |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 21,490 | -44 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:19 | 21,534 | +571 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:21 | 20,963 | +143 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 20,820 | +168 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 20,652 | +150 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:40 | 20,502 | +347 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 20,155 | +366 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 19,789 | +152 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:58 | 19,637 | +169 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:03 | 19,468 | +220 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 19,248 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 19,252 | +67 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 19,185 | +132 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 19,053 | +23 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 19,030 | +41 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:55 | 18,989 | -127 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:22 | 19,116 | +93 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 19,023 | +87 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 18,936 | -60 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 18,996 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (1 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 24,425 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 17:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
56 reactions across 25 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
甜甜 #浦东 | 陕西小萝莉 1000P- 1800PP 🛫 @ovott_678(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(18) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:是一个陕西的萝莉小妹妹,有多位狼友反馈都不错,该有的服务都有,态度良好,嫩妹爱好者放心约课。
❤1
兔子牙 #黄埔 | 宝藏女友型 1100p—2000PP 🛫 @tian_oyo(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(26) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说: 妹妹绝非流水线式的死板服务,而是让人意犹未尽的“宝藏女友型”体验。无论是想享受初恋般的甜蜜,还是追求水乳交融的快感,兔子牙妹妹都绝对值得无限回购! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
小不点 #浦东 | 可爱小妹妹 700p—1100PP 🛫 @xbd5252 (备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(15) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:是一名服务系的可爱小妹妹,服务没的挑,态度也不错,是一位非常骚气的妹妹,值得去体验去开发。
❤1
亿涵 #浦东 | 大学生嫩妹 1000p—1800PP 🛫 @yihan311 (备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(15) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:亿涵 最难得的是不仅颜值身材在线,细节与卫生更是做到了极致:一次性用品齐全、环境干净整洁,安全感满满。极力推荐!”⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️
❤1
冰冰 #静安 | 性价比御姐 800P—1500PP 🛫@bingxiaobing(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(9) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:有老哥约课后给了一句肯定的话,是一次流连忘返的体验,性价比非常高的一位御姐型妹妹。
安安 #徐汇 | 服务系高颜值 900P—1600PP 🛫 @anan241108(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(21) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹性价比非常高,属于服务系里的高颜值,归属于御姐类别,喜欢御姐类型的可以无脑冲。
❤3
婉茹 #宝山 | 性价比小萝莉 600P- 1000PP 🛫 @jiangxiaobaiya(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(23) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:不要看价钱便宜,但是妹妹还是小萝莉,具备非常高的性价比,服务也没得说,水多、态度好。
点点 #浦东 | 极致性价比 700P- 1100PP 🛫 @Sh77dd77(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(18) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹是一位非常有职业素养老师,非常的卖力认真,按摩手法一流,给你一种领家少妇的感觉。
骚气小狂魔 #徐汇 | 情绪价值 800P- 1400PP 🛫 @xkm88881(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(14) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说: 通过老哥们反馈,妹妹在800的档这个价位来说,就是御姐天花板,非常的骚气,是一个小话唠。
❤4
懒羊羊 #长宁 | 清纯嫩妹 1000P-1800PP 🛫 @lanyy0802(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(16) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:妹妹浑身散发着青春的气息,样貌、服务都是非常的哇塞。
❤2
火火 #浦东 | 服务系妹妹 700P-1200PP 🛫 @huohuo1919(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(44) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:火火妹妹的人气就跟名字一样,红红火火,在服务系来说,火火妹妹应该属于第一梯队,服务态度都没得说,放心出击不踩坑。
秀儿 #浦东 | 人照一致 1000P-1500PP 🛫 @xiuer6699(备注:蕉点) 神评:点击查看(17) ------------------------------- 蕉哥说:约课秀儿妹妹的都说是完美约课,服务没的说,人照一致,情绪价值拉满,主打就是真实。
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @shjdtop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“上海【蕉点】人气榜” (@shjdtop), 21,490 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shjdtop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.