Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -34,015. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 19:59
27
-38,450
14 Sept 2026, 02:16
38,477
-303
12 Sept 2026, 09:41
38,780
+415
10 Sept 2026, 08:58
38,365
+642
7 Sept 2026, 00:19
37,723
+192
4 Sept 2026, 09:55
37,531
+880
2 Sept 2026, 19:33
36,651
-127
1 Sept 2026, 17:43
36,778
-107
31 Aug 2026, 21:13
36,885
+20
30 Aug 2026, 23:14
36,865
+211
29 Aug 2026, 21:45
36,654
+116
28 Aug 2026, 22:25
36,538
+400
28 Aug 2026, 01:17
36,138
+261
27 Aug 2026, 03:56
35,877
-97
26 Aug 2026, 05:52
35,974
-99
25 Aug 2026, 02:34
36,073
-108
23 Aug 2026, 17:45
36,181
-148
22 Aug 2026, 03:48
36,329
-100
20 Aug 2026, 18:38
36,429
-62
19 Aug 2026, 21:35
36,491
first reading
Engagement
540 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8677.4%
avg views ÷ 27 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,340
161 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
161
of 540 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 161 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026
Posts held
540 (3 August 2026 – 11 September 2026)
Views total
377,207
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
26m 12s
Average length
2m 11s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 540 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fear4lde. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 540 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 11 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
یه پروندهی پنهان، یه تصادف و تصمیمی که جی برای نجات جونگوون گرفت؛
تصمیمی که باعث شد جونگوون بعد از یه ماه کما بیدار بشه، اما جی رو کنار خودش نبینه و فروپاشی روانی رو تجربه کنه.سالها بعد، جونگوون بهعنوان قاضی و جی به عنوان وکیل، توی پروندهای مربوط به گذشته دوباره روبهروی هم قرار میگیرن؛ درحالیکه جی برای رسیدن به عدالت تا مرز قانونشکنی پیش میره و طبق عقده ای از گذشته قاتل هارو به روش خودش محاکمه میکنه.
Chapter…
_ لطفا دو پست پین شده رو فوروارد کنید و یک پست کوتاه مشخص کنید فور کنم.
حداقل +30 ویوو داشته باشید.
چهل چنل اول بدون لیمیتد.
از +80 ویوو دو پست و +140 ویوو سه پست فوروارد میشه.
Showing the 12 most recent of 540 posts we hold for @fear4lde. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fear4lde edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
17 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@fear4lde named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@chaennie named in 1 post, 6 September 2026 – 6 September 2026
@gifts named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
ׁ𝐋𝛖𝛈𝛂 𝚮𝛜𝛊𝛒 آمـوزشـ و دیـ✿ـزاین @LunaTutorials · 11,658#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 1 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝖡𝑂𝗅𝗅𝖺 𝗍ℎ𝖾𝗆𝖾 @bollaland · 27,305 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 September 2026
^᪲᪲᪲ 𝐶𝖺𝗋𝖽𝗂𝗀𝖺𝗇 𝂅 @Themecore · 144,618 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 12 August 2026
𝖬𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗂𝖽𝖺 | تم و لنگوئج @wl4nd · 249,262 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 12 August 2026
Wanna be yours @loventaste · 105,709 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 August 2026
ㅤ𝒯ᮢ 𝗁ᥱ𑄕ᥱ ׁ بنر @revltheme · 11 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 13 September 2026
tׁⴌּ͠ꫀꩁִꫀ𓈒 تم تلگرام @aspentheme · 128,028 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 13 August 2026
𝙑𝙤𝙡𝙩𝙪𝙧𝙞 𝙀𝙙𝙞𝙩 @Volturi_edit · 23,119 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 September 2026
محافظ دژم @dozhaami · 16 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 1 September 2026
𝙁𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙨 𝙇𝙖𝙣𝙙 @Fonts_Land · 28,272 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Yaghob bnrr” (@fear4lde), 27 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fear4lde.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
