Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Барселона | Барса

Channel

Барселона | Барса

@fcbarca_sports

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,621subscribers

-295 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001105224663
TypeChannel
Username@fcbarca_sports
DescriptionАвторский канал Ромика Геворгяна о лучшем клубе мира ✨ При поддержке @sportsru 📩 Рекламные вопросы ТОЛЬКО через: https://clck.ru/3BtbNe. Мы не предлагаем рекламу сами 📲 Дружба / обмены / конкурсы / коллабы: @feed_back_sportsru_bot № 4787977890
Created12 April 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/fcbarca_sports

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

28,62128,93028,775.56 August 2026 — 28,916 subscribers6 August 2026 — 28,916 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,913 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,902 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,899 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,904 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,900 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,884 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,881 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,876 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,891 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,893 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,888 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,884 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,912 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,899 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,885 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,896 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,921 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,930 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,928 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,924 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,905 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,887 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,879 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,873 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,872 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,844 subscribers5 September 2026 — 28,833 subscribers8 September 2026 — 28,780 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,742 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,715 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,684 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,656 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,621 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,575–28,976 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 21:2028,621-35
16 Sept 2026, 16:1828,656-28
14 Sept 2026, 22:2028,684-31
13 Sept 2026, 08:4128,715-27
11 Sept 2026, 09:3628,742-38
8 Sept 2026, 18:0128,780-53
5 Sept 2026, 12:4028,833-11
3 Sept 2026, 14:1628,844-28
2 Sept 2026, 05:2328,872-1
1 Sept 2026, 05:1628,873-6
31 Aug 2026, 05:1328,879-8
30 Aug 2026, 07:3828,887-18
29 Aug 2026, 10:5728,905-19
28 Aug 2026, 14:0428,924-4
27 Aug 2026, 17:1128,928-2
26 Aug 2026, 16:0428,930+9
25 Aug 2026, 16:0828,921+25
24 Aug 2026, 17:3828,896+11
23 Aug 2026, 05:1728,885-14
21 Aug 2026, 19:0328,899first reading

Engagement

920 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 28,621 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,060
384 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
384
of 920 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 383 of 384 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held920 (6 August 202620 September 2026)
Views total1,559,564
Reactions total38,937
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
60,400
Videos
2,990
Links
50,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 52m
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 157 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90,551 reactions across 919 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥19,49121.5%
custom 580320395458196846918,75320.7%
👍15,54317.2%
🔥9,21210.2%
🤡5,7596.36%
😁4,9115.42%
😢3,4863.85%
👏1,8832.08%
💔1,8782.07%
👎1,7661.95%
🥰1,3321.47%
🙏1,1371.26%
custom 54068972418918249761,0701.18%
🤯8700.961%
🕊7230.798%
🤬6400.707%
😍4230.467%
custom 53752097419810824632700.298%
🎉2430.268%
💯2410.266%
7 further kinds9201.02%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 919 of the 920 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90,551 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 920 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 920 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @fcbarca_sports. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 920 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 07:55 UTC1 viewsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🥶📈 График 1: Рейтинг лучших игроков по созданным голевым моментам и успешным обводкам 🥶📈 График 2: Рейтинг лучших бомбардиров по ожидаемым Г/А и фактическим количеством Г/А 🔣 Дублируем посты в Max, если у вас не грузит телегра

20 Sept 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,450 views42 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

❤️ 🔣 Дублируем посты в Max, если у вас не грузит телегра

custom 580320395458196846935😎3🏆2👍2

19 Sept 2026, 23:03 UTC≈3,830 views203 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

😮‍💨🇧🇷 Рафаэль Диас Белоли 🔣 Дублируем посты в Max, если у вас не грузит телегра

custom 5803203954581968469155custom 523365494282416357422🔥19👏5👎1😎1

19 Sept 2026, 22:48 UTC≈3,840 views138 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🔥🤩 Реакция Ханси Флика и тренерского штаба на победный гол Рафиньи 🔣 Дублируем посты в Max, если у вас не грузит телегра

custom 5803203954581968469121❤‍🔥16👎1

19 Sept 2026, 22:36 UTC≈3,750 views181 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

🥺❤️ Фермин с бабушкой после матча 🔣 Дублируем посты в Max, если у вас не грузит телегра

🥰131❤‍🔥22👍17custom 58032039545819684697🤩2😍2

19 Sept 2026, 22:22 UTC≈3,720 views42 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

❓ Рафинья на грани продления контракта до 2030 года, и Деку объявил эту новость сегодня, а Рафинья всегда говорит, что вы изменили его жизнь, так что какова ваша оценка этой новости и того, что он останется до 2030 года 🎙️ Флик: Я думаю, что для клуба это лучшее решение И когда ты также видишь, насколько он связан с болельщиками и с командой, я думаю, что он идеальный лидер для этой команды и для этого клуба. И он

👍23custom 580320395458196846913🔥4❤‍🔥2

19 Sept 2026, 22:04 UTC≈3,420 views100 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

💪❤️🏆 🔣 Дублируем посты в Max, если у вас не грузит телегра

🏆61custom 580320395458196846928custom 52336549428241635749❤‍🔥2

19 Sept 2026, 22:02 UTC≈3,440 views62 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🎙️ Луис Гарсия Пласа (тренер «Севильи»): – Рафинья даже не кандидат на «Золотой мяч», и есть вещи в футболе, которые я до сих пор не понимаю. Что этот игрок не кандидат на «Золотой мяч», – это нечто, что я иногда не в силах понять в футболе. – Думаю, единственной проблема была в первом тайме Мы проиграли 3:1. Однако уже само противостояние с ними создает ощущение, что мы делаем что-то важное, потому что они разгр

❤‍🔥45👍13👏4

19 Sept 2026, 21:56 UTC≈3,350 views42 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

❓ Что дает команде Ливакович? И что вы видите в нем ежедневно как в хорватском вратарe? 🎙️ Фермин Лопес: Он вратарь, который дарит вам много уверенности И я думаю, что у него большой опыт, ведь он играл в чемпионатах мира. И я думаю, что он провел очень хорошую игру. Не было легко провести свою первую игру здесь на стадионе Севильи, и мы очень рады его присоединению. ❓ А ты, как дела? Потому что это сезон, когда

👍27custom 580320395458196846912👏3

19 Sept 2026, 21:48 UTC≈3,340 views51 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

❓ Семь побед из семи матчей, идеальный результат, даже вы сами удивлены этим? 🎙️ Родри: Очевидно, наша цель, как сказал тренер, заключалась в том, чтобы одержать семь побед в семи матчах до паузы Цель достигнута. Я считаю, что команда была впечатляющей в этот период. А сегодня, возможно, это был самый сложный матч с тех пор, как мы начали, и заслуга в этом принадлежит «Севилье», потому что, на мой взгляд, они про

custom 580320395458196846936❤‍🔥9👍6

19 Sept 2026, 21:41 UTC≈3,340 views117 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

🇧🇷 Забив 14 голов в 8 матчах, Рафинья достиг лучшего старта по голам среди всех игроков за всю историю «Барселоны» – он превзошел достижение Сезара в сезоне 1948/49 🇪🇸 «Барселона» забила 31 гол в Ла Лиге в этом сезоне после 7 матчей, что является вторым лучшим показателем в истории турнира с сезона 1940/41 (Opta) 🔣 Дублируем посты в Max, если у вас не грузит телегра

custom 580320395458196846990🔥19❤‍🔥6👏2

19 Sept 2026, 21:34 UTC≈3,370 views79 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

❓ Как дела? Как ты себя чувствуешь после первого матча за «Барсу»? 🎙️ Доминик Ливакович: Конечно, я очень счастлив и горжусь Но важнее всего не один игрок, а вся команда и то, что мы победили. И мы продолжаем идеальное начало сезона, поэтому нам просто нужно продолжать в том же духе. ❓ Что улучшило выступление команды после перерыва? И почему мы смогли вернуться после первого гола? 🎙️ Доминик Ливакович: Мы прове

👍49❤‍🔥20custom 580320395458196846910

Showing the 12 most recent of 920 posts we hold for @fcbarca_sports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@fcbarca_sports edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

МИРОВОЙ ФУТБОЛ
@sportsrufootball · 80,366
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
FC BARCELONA
@newsbarca · 327,400
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Спортс“
@sportsru · 440,335
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
We Are Barca | Барселона
@fcbarcelonalive · 56,751
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Barca Family
@barcafamilyyy · 74,956
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
FC Barcelona Channel
@barcelona · 104,116
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
БАРСЕЛОНА
@i_barcelonafc · 65,991
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 August 2026
Панчер – UFC, ММА, Бокс
@puncher_sports · 46,601
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
БЕТСИТИ
@betcity · 132,751
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 August 2026
Main Football
@mainfootball · 68,152
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Барселона | Барса” (@fcbarca_sports), 28,621 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fcbarca_sports.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.