Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

«فەرموودەڪانی پێغەمبەرﷺ»

@farmwda

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

617subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001101606593
TypeChannel
Username@farmwda
CreatedBetween 1 February 2017 and 30 April 2018— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/farmwda

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@m_ramazan_shkur/7485 Jun 2025, 08:22 UTC@farmwda/1350 · this entry5 Jun 2025, 08:22 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@m_ramazan_shkur5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 15 May 2025 to 26 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @farmwda — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

617618617.56 Aug 2026, 16:22 — 618 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 17:34 — 618 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:23 — 617 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:227 Aug 2026, 04:23
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 617–618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:23617-1
6 Aug 2026, 17:34618no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:22618first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

29 reactions across 12 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2689.7%
👍310.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2025 to 26 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 May 2026, 09:35 UTC81 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @parwarday_mndale_muslmanFile

【 #زیکری_ڕۆژی_عەرەفە 】‎ 【 لا اله الا الله وحده لا شریڪ له له الملڪ وله الحمد و هو علی ڪل شی قدیـر 】‎ واتـە:- هیچ خوایە نیە بە تاك و تەنها و بەحەق بیپەرستیت جگە لە الله نەبێت ، موڵك و سامان هەمووی هی ئەوە، وە سوپاس و پێزانین هەر بۆ ئەوە بە راستی، وە ئەو دەسەڵات و توانای بە سەر هەموو شتێڪدا هەیە .

1

10 May 2026, 13:06 UTC91 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @parwarday_mndale_muslmanFile

📚ڪتێبی ❪ڕێبازی منداڵی موسڵمان❫ پێکهاتوە لە [ بیروباوەڕ ، ئاداب ، زیکرەکان ، فقه] لە بەشی عقیدەکە لاپەڕە ٦ هەڵەیەک کراوە لە ئایەتی ژمارە ١١ ی سوڕەتی شوری {لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِ شَيْءٌ ۖ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ} لەجێی وشەی البصیر نووسراوە العلیم خودا لێمان خۆشبێت هەر بەڕێزێك ئەم هەڵەیەی بینی ئاگاداربن ━❀🍃●💧✿💎✿💧●🍃❀━ 💎کـەنــاڵی 💧پەروەردەی منداڵی موسڵمان💧 🍃 @parwarday_mndale_muslman

1

10 May 2026, 13:06 UTC99 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @parwarday_mndale_muslmanFile

📚ڪتێبی ❪ژیاننامەی پێغەمبەری خواﷺ❫ بۆمنداڵان تێبینی تکایە ئاگاداربن هەڵەیەك لە لاپەڕە ٢٣ هەیە ، ئایەتی ﴿ وَأَنْذِرْ عَشِيرَتَكَ الْأَقْرَبِينَ ﴾ لە سوڕەتی الشعراء ئایەتی ژمارە ٢١٤ یە بەڵام تەنها (١٤) کە نووسراوە ان شاءالله بۆ هەر شوێنێک بڵاوتان کردوەتەوە ئاگاداریان بکەنەوە بارك الله فیکم ━❀🍃●💧✿💎✿💧●🍃❀━ 💎کـەنــاڵی 💧پەروەردەی منداڵی موسڵمان💧 🍃 @parwarday_mndale_muslman

10 May 2026, 13:06 UTC142 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @parwarday_mndale_muslman

دایکان و باوکانی بەڕێز ئەم پشوی هاوینە بقۆزنەوە بۆ منداڵەکانتان بیان نێرن بۆ مزگەوتەکان‌و بنکەکان بەڵکو فێری ئاداب و ڕەوەشت و پەروەردەی جوان بن دوو کتێبی گرنگ و بەسود بۆ پەروەردەکردنی منداڵەکانتان 📚کتێبی ❪ڕێبازی منداڵی موسڵمان❫ 📚کتێبی ❪ژیاننامەی پێغەمبەرﷺ ❫ کتێبی ڕێبازی منداڵی موسڵمان چوار بەش لە خۆ ئەگرێت [بیروباوڕ ـ زیکرەکان ـ ڕەوشتەکان ـ فـقـه] ئەم کتێبانە ئەتوانن بیکەن بە مەنهەج و پڕۆگرامێک لە مزگەوت و بنکە

2

26 Feb 2026, 19:12 UTC155 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @ahaditsahehaPhoto

(بەربانگ كردنەوە بە خورما یان ئاو) -------------- لە ئەنەسی كوڕی مالكەوە دەفەرموێت " كَانَ النَّبيُّ ( صلی الله علیە وسلم) يُفْطِرُ عَلَی رَطِابَاتٍ قَبْلَ أنْ يُصَلي ، فَإنْ لم يَكُنْ رَطِابَاتٍ ، فَتَمْراتٍ ، فَإِنْ لم يَكُنْ تَمْرَاتٍ حَسَا حَسَواتٍ مِنْ مَاء " واتە: پێغەمبەری خوا( صلی الله علیە وسلم) بەربانگی دەكردەوە بەچەند خورمایەكی تەڕ پێش ئەوەی نوێژبكات, جا ئەگەر خورمای تەڕ نەبووایە, بە هەر خورمایەكی تر ب

2

23 Feb 2026, 22:51 UTC137 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

♦️لە صحیحی مسلم دا هاتووە لە أبوالدرداء ەوە کە پێغەمبەری خودا«🤍» فەرموویەتی: 🔖ئایە هەرکەسێ لە ئێوە بێ توانایە لەوەی ڕۆژانە سێ یەکی قوڕئان بخوێنێ؟ فەرموویان پێی: بەڵی پێغەمبەر فەرمووی: خوای گەورە قوڕئانی کردووە بە سێ بەشەوە جا «قل هو اللە أحد» سێ یەکی قوڕئانە🔖

6

23 Feb 2026, 22:50 UTC132 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

💐لە فەزڵەکانی سوڕەتی الإخلاص: ▫️خۆشویستنی ئەم سوڕەتە خۆشەویستی اللە دەبەخشێ بە بەندە ▫️هەروەها خۆشویستنی ئەم سوڕەتە وا دەکات بەندە بچێتە بەهەشتەوە ▫️یەکسانە بە سێ یەکی قوڕئان ▫️بەخوێندنی شەڕ و خراپە لەبەندە دوردەخاتەوە ▫️بە خوێندنی ١٠جاری ئەم سوڕەتە لە بەهەشتدا خانوو بۆ خوێنەرەکەی بنیات دەنرێت ▫️بەخوێندنی پێش دوعاکردن ، وادەکات دوعاکە قبوڵ و گیرا ببێت بەم شێوازە:➖اللهُمَّ إني أسألُك بأني أشهَدُ أن لا إله إلا أ

1

23 Feb 2026, 10:00 UTC119 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

« اللهم صل وسلم علی نبينا محمد »

23 Feb 2026, 09:54 UTC137 viewsread 6 August 2026

⚪️ ڪارێك پــاداشــتــەڪەیــ وەك #جـــیــهـــاد ڪردن وایــە . 💭 هاوەڵی بەڕێز ابو هريرة(رضی الله عنه) لە پێغەمبەری خواوە ﴿ﷺ﴾بۆمان دەگێڕێتەوە کە فەرموویەتی :- 🍁 [[ ئەوەی كە بێوەژن و هەژاران بەسەر دەكاتەوە ، وەك خەباتكارێكە لە ڕێگای خودا ، یان وەك كەسێكە كە بە شەو شەونوێژ دەكات و بە ڕۆژیش بەڕۆژوو دەبێت ]] 🍁 [[ السَّاعي على الأرملةِ والمسكينِ ، كالمُجاهدِ في سبيلِ اللَّهِ ، أو القائمِ الليلَ والصائمِ النهارِ ]] 🔹 د

23 Feb 2026, 09:53 UTC95 viewsread 6 August 2026

گەورەیی مانگی ڕەمەزان گەورەیی ڕۆژووی ڕەمەزان فەرموودەی تایبەت بە ئادابەکانی ڕۆژوو وە مانگی ڕەمەزان، فەرموودە لاوازەکان سەبارەت بە ڕەمەزان، چەن فەرموودەیەک سەبارەت بە ئیعتکاف و شەوانی قدر ☟☟☟ https://t.me/farmwda/761 https://t.me/farmwda/762 https://t.me/farmwda/763 https://t.me/farmwda/764 https://t.me/farmwda/765 https://t.me/farmwda/766 https://t.me/farmwda/767 https://t.me/farmwda/768 https://t.me/farmwda/769 htt

21 Dec 2025, 19:13 UTC301 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

«فەرموودەڪانی پێغەمبەرﷺ»: 👈🏽(( فەرموودە هەڵبەستراو لاوازەڪان لە گەوورەی مانگی ڕەجەب )) 1 - (( بەڕۆژووبوون لە ڕۆژی یەڪەمی ڕەجەب ڪەفارەتە بۆ ماوەی سێ ساڵ، دووەمیان ڪەفارەتە بۆ ماوەی دوو ساڵ، سێیەمیان ڪەفارەتە بۆ ماوەی ساڵێڪ، پاشان هەموو ڕۆژێڪ بۆ ماوەی مانگێڪ )) ئەفەرموودەیە لاوازە ئاگادار بــە ❌✋ 👈🏽 ضعفه الألباني في 📚 ضعيف الجامع - رقم : (3500) 2 - (( ڪاتێڪ ڕەجەب دەستی پێڪرد دەیفەرموو: خوایە ڕەجەب و شەعبانمان بۆ ببە

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @farmwda. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 862,636 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“«فەرموودەڪانی پێغەمبەرﷺ»” (@farmwda), 617 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/farmwda.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.