Снг вуман момент https://www.tiktok.com/@kolashdash/video/7545411816415890710?_r=1&_t=ZM-8zezl9zBEE4
👍5

Channel
@famka6654
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
76subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001892975972 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @famka6654 |
| Description | Про Фемінізм. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/famka6654 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:00 | 76 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 76 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 9 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
108 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 65 | 60.2% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 13.9% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 13.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 5.56% | |
| 💊 | 5 | 4.63% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.85% | |
| 🤡 | 1 | 0.926% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 108reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2025 to 30 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Снг вуман момент https://www.tiktok.com/@kolashdash/video/7545411816415890710?_r=1&_t=ZM-8zezl9zBEE4
👍5
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/bVSzfTOuQEE Чекаємо на тебе наш рідний🥺🥺🙏🏼 Поверніть брата з полону!!!! Поверніть всіх з полону живими!!! #полон #війна #морпіхигероїукраїни #повернітьгероївдодому #русскийвоенныйкорабльидинахуй #вірювзсу #славаукраїні #морпіхи
👍5
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/Z-_bIvveEFQ
👍4
📢 Друзья, нужна ваша помощь военному в СЗЧ после ранения с травмированной ногой, который сейчас остался на улице и в розыске! Обращаюсь ко всем не равнодушным. Я в прошлом военнослужащий ДШВ. После ранения в СЗЧ. Сбежал с полигона я сейчас нахожусь в критических обстоятельствах.. второй день не имею где ночевать даже .. опухла стопа . Пожалуйста кто может откликнитесь. Я очень прошу кто может помогите... любой пом…
😢4
Я хотів дискусії, а не бану від тебе. Значить не має, що сказати?
👍5
Їй всього лише було 23. 💔🥀🥀🥀🥺 IIryna Zarutska was 23 years RIP. (
😢10
Я не шкодую. Удачі їй ⛵⛵⛵.....
👍6🤔2
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NMMeyBWdq_8 Не тема каналу, але зроблю розповсюдження відео й гри.
💯7
Чому дівчата такі недоступні зараз? Одна з причин — це чималий ринок Instagram, TikTok, Telegram, Viber та інші платформи, як-от Badoo. Через них у дівчат формується завищена самооцінка, що вражає в негативному сенсі. Звичайні (не моделі) дівчата хочуть "Чеда" — накачаного, привабливого на обличчі, сексуального, статусного і ще з чималими грошима, але "Чед" у більшості випадків їх не хоче. Замкнене коло? Чи здохла са…
👍9
Написав, що в дівчини буває еротичний контент в контексті малюнків, а не самої дівчини. Написав, що вона красива. Написав, що не тільки через, це все був в чаті й групі. Але блять знайшли "сексуалізацію".
👍7
Шиза блять написав в чаті @motkheii, що дівчина красива. І іноді буває еротика в неї, але не тільки заради, цього я там. І тут же налетіли про животик, так далі. Сексуалізація/шмулізація, як це розуміти? Де блять, я кого сексуалізовував? Їбать із-за фемінізму в баб поплава.
💯8
Найстрашніше, що сьогодні неможливо достовірно відрізнити, чи це сидить товстий троль, чи це реальна людина з реальними поглядами, адже таке може бути у наш час. Одним словом разборка твіттерская...
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @famka6654. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 814,797 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фемкоізм” (@famka6654), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/famka6654.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.