Channel
@fals_news
On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
585subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002533914393 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fals_news |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fals_news |
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 463 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
413 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 585 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 586 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 587 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 587 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,665 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بیانیه خانواده شهید لاریجانی درباره برخی از گمانهزنیهای رسانهای خانواده شهید لاریجانی در واکنش به برخی اظهارات درباره نحوه شهادت ایشان: ✅ادعاهای مطرحشده تأیید نهادهای مسئول نیست و حتی بهعنوان یکی از فرضیههای حادثه نیز مطرح نشده است. ✅ شهید مرتضی لاریجانی ماهها پیش از جنگ رمضان هیچ تلفن همراهی نداشت و در این زمینه نسبت به همراهان خود نیز حساس بود. ⚠️خانواده از رسانهها و شخصیتها خواستند تا از گمانهزنی و …
قوهقضائیه: ادعای ردزنی محل استقرار شهید لاریجانی از طریق تماس تلفنی صحت ندارد 🔹خبرگزاری قوهقضائیه: پیگیریها از پروندۀ قضایی مربوط به شهادت علی لاریجانی نشان میدهد ادعای یکی از نمایندگان مجلس مبنی بر شناسایی محل استقرار شهید لاریجانی از طریق تماس تلفنی فرزندش با خانواده، صحت ندارد. 🔹بررسیهای انجامشده و پروندۀ تشکیلشده در این باره، این ادعا را تأیید نمیکند. @Farsna
رگولاتوری: ادعای اعمال ضریب ۲.۷ برای اینترنت بینالملل صحت ندارد ❌ اخیرا در فضای مجازی گمانهزنیهایی درباره اعمال «ضریب ۲.۷» در محاسبه ترافیک اینترنت بینالملل مطرح شد. طبق این ادعا مصرف هر یک گیگابایت اینترنت بینالملل، معادل ۲.۷ گیگابایت از حجم بسته مشترک محاسبه و باعث میشود حجم بستهها زودتر از انتظار به پایان برسد. ✅ سازمان تنظیم مقررات و ارتباطات رادیویی: هیچ ضریب ۲.۷ یا ضریب افزایشی دیگری برای محاسبه مصرف ا…
شایعه «معافیت سربازان فراری» تکذیب شد ❌ اخیرا در فضای مجازی شایعهای درباره معافیت سربازان فراری منتشر شد که به سرعت دست به دست شد. ✅ سازمان وظیفۀ عمومی فراجا: کارکنان وظیفهای که به هر دلیل خدمت سربازی خود را به پایان نرساندهاند، باید برای تعیینتکلیف وضعیت خدمتی خود به یگان خدمتی مراجعه کنند و هیچ نوع معافیت جدیدی برای آنان در نظر گرفته نشده است. ⚠️ سربازان فراری در صورت عدم تعیینتکلیف وضعیت خدمتی خود با محروم…
🎥 بیبیسی و اینترنشنال چگونه بین خود تقسیم نقش کردهاند؟ @Farsna
انهدام مهمات عملنکرده در پاکدشت 🔹روابطعمومی سپاه سیدالشهدا تهران: انهدام مهمات عملنکردۀ تجاوز آمریکاییصهیونی در شهرستان پاکدشت از ساعت ۹ الی ۱۲ صورت میگیرد و جای نگرانی نیست. @Farsna - Link
احتمال شنیدهشدن صدای انفجار در محدودۀ جنوب اصفهان 🔹سپاه استان اصفهان: فردا از ساعت ۸ صبح تا ۱۴ احتمال شنیدهشدن صدای انفجار کنترل شده در محدوده صفه، سپاهان شهر و اطراف آن وجود دارد. @Farsna - Link
🎥 دستگیری عامل تولید کلیپ جعلی اعتراض نوجوانان کشتیگیر به اعدام 🔹این فرد با سوء استفاده از ویدیوی گرفته شده از تمرینات کشتی نوجوانان، بدون اینکه هیچکدام از آنها اطلاعی داشته باشند، بهعنوان اعتراض به اعدام تروریستهای آشوبهای اصفهان منتشر کرده بود. 🔸پیشتر قوه قضائیه برای برخورد با هرگونه انتشار محتوا در خصوص سیاهنمایی و همسویی با رسانههای دشمن در خصوص اعدام جنایتکاران اغتشاشات هشدار داده داده بود @Farsna
دفتر رهبر انقلاب: مطلب منتشرشده در فضای مجازی که در آن فردی ادعایی را دربارهٔ واکنش رهبر انقلاب اسلامی به نامهٔ رئیسجمهور مطرح کرده از اساس کذب و خلاف واقع است 🔹متن اطلاعیهٔ روابطعمومی دفتر رهبر انقلاب: بسمالله الرحمن الرحیم 🔹با گرامیداشت اربعین حسینی و ادای احترام به روح بلند رهبر شهید انقلاب بهاطلاع مردم شریف و مبعوثشدهٔ ایران می رساند در روزهای گذشته برخی نقلقولها از رهبری معظم انقلاب اسلامی در فضای مجازی…
جزئیات حادثۀ انفجار در کمربندی اسلامآباد غرب 🔹شهبازی، فرماندار اسلامآباد غرب دربارهٔ جزئیات حادثهٔ انفجار در حوالی کمربندی شرقی اسلامآباد غرب به خبرنگار فارس گفت: حوالی ساعت ۱۳ امروز گلوله توپ ۱۲۰ میلیمتری باقیمانده از جنگ تحمیلی ۸ ساله بر اثر شدت گرما عمل کرده و منفجر شده است. 🔹او افزود: برخلاف شایعات هیچ حملهای به پل کمربندی صورت نگرفته و انفجار این مهمات بهجامانده از جنگ نیز هیچ خسارتی به این پل وارد نک…
شایعه تخلیه شهرستان جاسک کذب است ✅فرمانداری شهرستان جاسک با تکذیب شایعات منتشرشده درباره تخلیه این شهرستان، اعلام کرد شرایط منطقه کاملاً عادی است و از شهروندان خواست اخبار را تنها از منابع رسمی دنبال کنند. @Fals_News
❤2
🎥 از دعوت به حضور مسلحانه در خیابان تا چرا قاتل را اعدام میکنید @Farsna
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @fals_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,156,779 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فالس نیوز” (@fals_news), 585 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fals_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.