Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 东南亚大事件|曝光|新闻时报

Channel

东南亚大事件|曝光|新闻时报

@t77777

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

214,018subscribers

-24,757 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002656374763
TypeChannel
Username@t77777
Description聚焦东南亚华人新闻与社会动态,分享生活故事、文化交流与真实见闻。 #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #缅甸 #泰国 我们关注每一位海外华人的声音,让你了解区域热点、见证身边故事。 新闻投稿 @bx022
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/t77777

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 4 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@t77777/43691 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC@bx600/5936223 Oct 2026, 14:28 UTC0.942 minutes
@bx600/5697515 Sept 2026, 05:07 UTC@t77777/40292 · this entry15 Sept 2026, 05:10 UTC0.904 minutes
@t77777/44582 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 13:19 UTC@bx600/599871 Nov 2026, 14:16 UTC0.8957 minutes
@bx600/5954626 Oct 2026, 12:25 UTC@t77777/43961 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC0.886 minutes
@t77777/39903 · this entry11 Sept 2026, 03:17 UTC@bx600/5669811 Sept 2026, 03:37 UTC0.8819 minutes
@t77777/38386 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC@bx600/5561826 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC0.884 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bx6009 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.867 minutesthis entry (7–2)
@djs1237 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.884 minutesthis entry (7–0)
@f77o76 (5/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.881.9 hoursthis entry (5–1)
@dashijian195 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.837 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 3 of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 2,138 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

179,293238,775209,034214,0187 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 95 days, net -24,757. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 170,371–247,697 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:35214,018-175
8 Nov 2026, 21:20214,193+531
7 Nov 2026, 16:49213,662-2,493
6 Nov 2026, 14:15216,155+4,344
5 Nov 2026, 15:19211,811-1,516
4 Nov 2026, 16:56213,327-1,596
3 Nov 2026, 16:45214,923-426
2 Nov 2026, 17:46215,349-355
1 Nov 2026, 16:10215,704-1,244
31 Oct 2026, 18:39216,948-1,158
30 Oct 2026, 18:07218,106-2,008
29 Oct 2026, 20:11220,114+4,248
28 Oct 2026, 20:31215,866+6,221
27 Oct 2026, 20:19209,645-1,047
26 Oct 2026, 21:04210,692-2,145
25 Oct 2026, 18:21212,837-1,206
24 Oct 2026, 17:56214,043+2,518
23 Oct 2026, 15:06211,525-1,970
22 Oct 2026, 14:51213,495+1,936
21 Oct 2026, 08:06211,559first reading

Engagement

2,516 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 196 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.06%
avg views ÷ 214,018 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,100
706 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.009%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
706
of 2,516 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 403 of 706 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held2,516 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total10,663,518
Reactions total525
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 15:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈21,100
Videos
≈5,490
Links
≈10,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 10m
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 264 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

840 reactions across 471 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤68081.0%
👍11613.8%
💩161.90%
🔥60.714%
🤣40.476%
⚡30.357%
😁30.357%
👏20.238%
😢20.238%
🤔20.238%
🥰20.238%
👌10.119%
👎10.119%
😭10.119%
🤓10.119%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 600 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 840 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 October 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 31 of 706 posts held from the last 30 days (4.39%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 15:09 UTC306 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:沙巴四地联合突击行动!107名非法移民落网,其中包括25名儿童 马来西亚沙巴州移民局于11月9日至11日期间,在亚庇、兵南邦、兰瑙及山打根展开多场联合执法行动,共扣留107名非法移民,其中包括25名儿童,另有一名雇主被扣留调查。 据当地媒体11月11日报道,移民局此次行动重点针对住宅区、商业场所、水疗中心及出租房间,严厉打击非法入境、非法居留及非法聘用外籍劳工等活动。 其中,11月11日,执法人员在山打根及兰瑙展开突击检查,共扣留71名外籍人士,包括68名菲律宾籍人员及3名印尼籍人员。 在山打根的行动中,执法人员凌晨1时35分展开突击检查,针对5处地点进行搜查,共检查83人,扣留50人,其中包括25名儿童。 与此同时,移民局也在兰瑙3处地点展开检查,共检查24人,扣留21名菲律宾籍人员。 另外,11月9日,移民局在亚庇及兵南邦展开执法行动,共检查312人,最终扣留36名外籍人士,包括34名菲律宾籍人员…

11 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈11,900 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

印尼警方在菲律宾秘密抓捕数十名网络诈骗嫌疑人,涉案人员正被押送回国 11月10日,印尼国家警察总长苏尤迪·阿里奥·塞托(Suyudi Ario Seto)透露,印尼警方近日在菲律宾展开秘密执法行动,成功抓获数十名涉嫌参与网络诈骗活动的人员,目前相关嫌疑人正被安排押送返回印尼。 据介绍,此次行动主要针对在菲律宾境内活动、以印尼国内民众为诈骗目标的跨境网络诈骗人员。 苏尤迪表示,警方已经成功控制一批涉案人员,并正在办理押送回国相关事宜,以便进一步调查案件。 目前,警方尚未公布具体抓捕人数、嫌疑人身份及诈骗团伙的详细情况。印尼警方表示,后续将由相关部门公布更多行动细节。 关注大事件频道🔥 @T77777 📮投稿:@bx022

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈15,700 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#付费广告 👍👍👍👍 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍 👍 东南亚大事件担保300万U 👍 资金储备 2亿U|全网上押 3300万U 👍 金边金界贵宾厅直营 · 实体背书 👍 100%保障出款 · 秒充秒提 👍👍👍 👍👍👍 👍👍👍 👍 优惠福利,尊贵体验 👉点击展开👈 👍 每日充值赠送👍👍 👍 首存豪礼:赠送8888U! 👍 二存三存:再享8888U! 👍 绑定机器人:送3个月TG会员 👍 百家乐专属:8输9转运金! 👍 高反水高返佣:福利不停! 👍 邀请好友:立即领取1888U! 👍 单笔出款100万+:可享最高88888U! 👍 每月六天充值狂欢节:1-3号-15-17号限时6天 👍👍👍 👍👍👍 👍👍👍 💥超高,爆率,大额爆奖喜讯 🔥 🥇尊贵VIP【CE***】盈利提款 220万U 🥈尊贵VIP【AA**2】纯盈利 205万U 🥉尊贵VIP【SA***】盈利提款 161万U 4️⃣尊贵VIP【ni***】 盈利提款 150万U 5️⃣尊贵V…

11 Nov 2026, 14:05 UTC≈9,810 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🏆东南亚大事件—每月活跃度积分排行活动 🎁奖项设置: 🥇活跃发言第1名奖励: 200U 🥈活跃发言第2名奖励: 150U 🥉活跃发言第3名奖励: 100U 🎖活跃发言第4-5奖励: 55U 🎖活跃发言第6-10奖励: 35U 🎖活跃发言第11-20奖励:会员三个月 🎉快拉你身边的朋友一起进群 ✅ 积分兑换 10,000 积分 = 会员 3 个月 25,000 积分 = 30刀 35,000 积分 = 45刀 活动规则 群内置顶 🔥 时光邀请您加入 📣东南亚吃瓜群众群组👇 💝💝💝💝💝💝💝 🌐https://t.me/yy277

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC≈11,800 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

今天看到这个帖子 说的是黑灰产买频道广告 然后放入诱饵链接 黑取读者手机盗U的 更有甚者,一些台子广告 实际上挂羊头卖狗肉 明面他在推广台子做引流 实际目的则是引流到台子后 还是以盗U为终极目的 真让人叹为观止 说到频道放广告盗U 之前也有个迪拜的人找到我 8年前他混西港 后来他去了迪拜 一直到现在 他毫不掩饰跟我讲 希望放个广告,目的是盗U 问我多少钱直接说 我表示拒绝,太特么丧良心了~~ 另外,据说啊 文森特虽然早被抓走了 但整个盗U界 业务量现在最大的 依然还是太子系 关注大事件频道🔥 @T77777 📮投稿:@bx022

❤2⚡1

11 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈9,760 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#付费广告 ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ “澳门银河:公平透明娱乐首选。已向NO钱包缴纳 3000W USDT保证金,品牌承诺公平公正,透明娱乐!” “所有游戏均为官方正版,如有发现私彩,串改开奖数据情况,授信全网监督,奖金100w-1000w美金” “平台优势: 出款超稳” 😀开户登入: yinhe.im 点击 🚀|TG小程序直登 |免费开户 |一键登入| “傲视世界 情繫亞洲” 即刻行動🚀玩轉澳門銀河 “澳門銀河顶级亚洲博彩体验,一触即发” “全网电子/捕鱼/棋牌/真人/体育等!汇聚亚洲顶尖娱乐,尽在线上平台” “全网优惠最大福利扶持/尊享终身VIP福利“ 😃😃😃😃 : yinhe.im 😃😃😃😃: @YINHEURL 😃😃😃😃: @YHYLBET 🚀T G 直登: @xihu_labot ❗️声明:澳门银河线上U站只做海外市场,从不涉及中国市场。

11 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC≈9,920 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:吉打移民局突袭建筑工地,30名外籍人员被捕,涉及孟加拉、缅甸及印尼籍 11月10日上午,马来西亚吉打州移民局展开名为 Ops Sapu 的执法行动,突袭位于双溪大年 Bandar Amanjaya 的一处建筑工地,对现场49名外籍及本地人员进行身份检查。 行动中,执法人员共扣留30名涉嫌违反移民法令的外籍人员,其中包括17名孟加拉国籍、12名缅甸籍及1名印尼籍人员。据悉,被扣留人员包括27名男性及3名女性,年龄介于20岁至50岁之间。 行动结束后,30名被捕人员被送往 Belantik 移民拘留中心,以接受进一步调查及处理。有关部门将继续调查涉案人员是否涉及违反马来西亚移民法令。 此次行动再次体现马来西亚移民执法部门持续加强对外籍劳工及非法居留人员的检查力度。 关注大事件频道🔥 @T77777 📮投稿:@bx022

11 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC≈12,000 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#群友投稿:最近老挝有不少捞人反被抓的事,大家有没有刷到? 万象有个翻译,想去帮被抓的中国人打听情况、想办法捞人,结果人没捞出来,自己当场被扣下调查。还有个中国人开奔驰跑到电诈抓捕现场捞人,直接一并被带走。还有很多同类事件没对外报道。赚钱有风险,捞人一定要谨慎。 很多人会疑惑:我只是帮朋友问问情况,怎么自己也出事?今天结合真实案例跟大家聊聊。 最近找我处理案件的人特别多,一天几十条咨询,有涉嫌电诈、贩毒、非法持枪,还有电子烟批发、送货的。我发现一个普遍问题:家属朋友过来,大多会隐瞒实情、避重就轻。明明是电诈骨干,只说自己就是打工的;查到大量毒品,说只是自己吸食;房间搜出几百上千支电子烟,还说不是用来卖的。 很多人觉得卖电子烟是小事,但在老挝,电子烟管控很严,大批量批发、运输、销售属于严重刑事风险,不是交点罚款就能了事。前两天有个做电子烟批发的网友找我,他手下很多送货的被抓,问我能不能摆平。他说以前花钱就能解决,现在不一样…

11 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC≈16,000 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:此路不通!现在想从缅甸走小路回中国,真没那么容易了。 上个星期三,我们老大硬塞了一个人情单,要把一个从缅甸腊戌出发的人,通过边境小路送回中国。老大也是个明事理、懂时局的人,只交代我们尽力而为,能把人安全送过去最好。 经过三天在边境徘徊、观察和等待,到了星期六,我们自认为准备得差不多了,便安排两名缅甸边境原住民带人正式出发。 没想到,出发不到五个小时,整队人就失联了。起初我们并不意外,但超过十二个小时仍联系不上,基本判断这次走小路回中国失败了,很可能已经被抓。 说说现在中缅边境走小路的情况。以我七年的带队经验来看,从中国走小路进入缅甸,成功率不到25%;从缅甸走小路回中国,成功率更是不足15%。这些只是我个人的经验判断。 嘿嘿,情况就是这么个情况。不是夸,也不是吹,中国边防武警的人员素质和装备水平确实很强。我认为,他们能不能抓到偷渡人员,很多时候不是能力问题,而是想不想抓的问题。 干了七年这一行,我越来越觉…

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 13:09 UTC≈14,100 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#泰国资讯:芭提雅抓获一名中国籍通缉犯!涉嫌开设赌场,持国际刑警蓝色通报 11月10日,据泰国媒体报道,泰国移民警察接获中国方面提供的线索后,经过约12小时追踪调查,在春武里府芭提雅成功抓获一名37岁中国籍男子。该男子因涉嫌开设赌场,已被中国警方通缉,并被国际刑警组织发布蓝色通报。 此次抓捕行动由中国驻泰国大使馆提供线索,泰国移民局高层统一指挥,特别调查组负责实施。泰方接获信息后迅速展开调查,经过约12小时追踪,最终锁定该男子在芭提雅的藏匿地点,并于11月10日凌晨将其成功抓获。 行动中,警方现场核验其护照及身份信息,确认与中国方面提供的通缉资料一致。随后,泰国移民部门依据相关法律撤销其居留许可,并将其认定为不符合在泰居留条件的人员。 目前,该男子已被移送至泰国移民拘留中心,泰方正与中方协调后续遣返及相关法律程序,准备将其送回中国接受进一步调查和处理。 关注大事件频道🔥 @T77777 📮投稿:@bx022

❤1

11 Nov 2026, 13:05 UTC≈15,800 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#付费广告 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 全球布局 · 品牌实力 😀 亿U储备 · 顶级信誉 · 赢家首选 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 单日首充人数突破5000位 😀 当天投注人数突破50000位 😀 玩家累计提现已达600亿USDT 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 注册送😀😀彩金,VIP无条件转移 😀 神秘彩金天天送,人人都有彩金领 😀 负盈返佣高达55%,无需流水出款 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀 大额出款更迅速,到账高效更安心 😀神秘大佬狂揽700万U,实力无需解释 😀少林足球豪取176万U,战绩闪耀全场 😀寻宝黄金城爆出109万U,一战封神 —————————————————— 😀 暴富通道:G7.com【USDT】 😀 暴富通道:G7.com【人民币】 😀 点击免费领取能量 —————————————————— 😀😀😀😀😀 G7.com 😀😀😀😀😀 @W777 😀😀😀😀😀 @wwwG7com #G7环球 #

11 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈15,900 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#付费广告 ☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️☺️ 😘😘😘😘😪😮‍💨😵 🌟 品牌运营 · 公平透明 🈴 上亿储备 · 实力品牌 · 放心娱乐 😀官方网址: 6G.com 📌柬埔寨专用域名: 6G.VIP 🦧🦣🐘🦛🦏🐪🐫🦒🦘 😔 持续积累口碑,平台实力看得见 ➡️ 新人注册即送🔡 36U体验金 💎 原平台VIP等级 · 无条件转移 💎 返水😀.😀😀起·无需打码 💎 代理全线抽水+负盈返佣高达50% 💎 邀请好友奖励🍌🍌🍌U 🦬🐃🐂🐄🫏🐎🐖🐏🐑 😔 大额处理更迅速,服务体验更稳定 😃 爆庄实录|3天狂揽1086万U 😃 新客首存6万U,豪提209万U 😃 500一拉,PG实力兑现133万U 😀 官网: 6G.COM 😀 彩票: 6G567.COM 😕飞投 @AA6G 💻客服 @KF6G 1️⃣代理 @daili6g 🤑 爆奖 @ceo6g 🔓 实力无需解释 · 出款快就是证明!

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,516 posts we hold for @t77777. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@t77777 edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @t77777 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
31 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“东南亚大事件|曝光|新闻时报” (@t77777), 214,018 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t77777.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.