Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Fact

Channel

Fact

@f0ctt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,400subscribers

-524 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001540909976
TypeChannel
Username@f0ctt
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/f0ctt

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

31,40031,92431,6626 August 2026 — 31,924 subscribers7 August 2026 — 31,923 subscribers8 August 2026 — 31,898 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,867 subscribers10 August 2026 — 31,840 subscribers11 August 2026 — 31,851 subscribers12 August 2026 — 31,825 subscribers14 August 2026 — 31,845 subscribers15 August 2026 — 31,850 subscribers16 August 2026 — 31,809 subscribers17 August 2026 — 31,798 subscribers18 August 2026 — 31,780 subscribers20 August 2026 — 31,779 subscribers21 August 2026 — 31,767 subscribers23 August 2026 — 31,752 subscribers24 August 2026 — 31,727 subscribers25 August 2026 — 31,718 subscribers26 August 2026 — 31,702 subscribers27 August 2026 — 31,705 subscribers28 August 2026 — 31,687 subscribers29 August 2026 — 31,665 subscribers30 August 2026 — 31,668 subscribers31 August 2026 — 31,663 subscribers1 September 2026 — 31,661 subscribers2 September 2026 — 31,646 subscribers4 September 2026 — 31,634 subscribers6 September 2026 — 31,659 subscribers9 September 2026 — 31,622 subscribers12 September 2026 — 31,603 subscribers13 September 2026 — 31,573 subscribers15 September 2026 — 31,568 subscribers17 September 2026 — 31,532 subscribers27 September 2026 — 31,400 subscribers6 August 202627 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 52 days, net -524. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,321–32,003 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Sept 2026, 10:4231,400-132
17 Sept 2026, 12:1531,532-36
15 Sept 2026, 12:3731,568-5
13 Sept 2026, 20:2131,573-30
12 Sept 2026, 02:0131,603-19
9 Sept 2026, 17:4031,622-37
6 Sept 2026, 12:5631,659+25
4 Sept 2026, 00:5931,634-12
2 Sept 2026, 18:2731,646-15
1 Sept 2026, 16:0331,661-2
31 Aug 2026, 15:2331,663-5
30 Aug 2026, 15:3631,668+3
29 Aug 2026, 18:0431,665-22
28 Aug 2026, 21:3331,687-18
27 Aug 2026, 19:4331,705+3
26 Aug 2026, 20:2731,702-16
25 Aug 2026, 19:4231,718-9
24 Aug 2026, 19:3831,727-25
23 Aug 2026, 04:2831,752-15
21 Aug 2026, 19:1631,767first reading

Engagement

184 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 31,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,460
76 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
76
of 184 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 76 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held184 (29 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total262,706
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 08s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 184 we hold a reading for · 0.5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @f0ctt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 184 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 27 September 2026

‏الإنقطاع عن التواصل البشري يتصل بك ‏قبول قبول بشدة

26 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,540 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

عندما يكون القرار الصحيح ولكن ليس القرار السعيد

25 Sept 2026, 20:10 UTC≈2,090 viewsread 27 September 2026

‏اتمنى دروس الحياه توقف خلاص فهمت

25 Sept 2026, 19:56 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 27 September 2026

‏أنا مبعرفش أعبر عن زعلى غير بالأختفاء والبعد عن الناس والنوم

25 Sept 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,440 viewsread 27 September 2026
Video

انا مع اي فعاليه تصير لاني اشوف كل شي تافه

24 Sept 2026, 20:38 UTC≈2,850 viewsread 27 September 2026

بشرتي ↙️↙️↙️↙️↙️ ‏شعري ↙️↙️↙️↙️↙️ ‏نفسيتي ↙️↙️↙️↙️↙️ ‏فلوسي ↙️↙️↙️↙️↙️ ‏درجاتي ↙️↙️↙️↙️↙️

23 Sept 2026, 19:03 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 27 September 2026

‏انا بقيت بحب النوم من باب انه بموت شوية عدد ساعات لا حد عايز منك في حاجة ولا حد هيعاتبك ف حاجة تصبيرة كدا لحد الوفاة

23 Sept 2026, 16:49 UTC≈3,330 viewsread 27 September 2026

‏اعتذر لنفسي على سوء اختياري لبعض البشر

22 Sept 2026, 18:43 UTC≈3,950 viewsread 27 September 2026

‏عندي مشكلة مع الناس اللي ماتقول شكرا

Showing the 12 most recent of 184 posts we hold for @f0ctt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Repost
@viiiivil · 33,758
#1
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 776,240
#2
One Last Goodbye
@lastgoodbye1 · 20,820
#3
بَلا ولا شيء
@JJ3DA · 20,405
#4
elsol
@i610e · 12,547
#5
مُحَمَّد
@ajl1_1 · 17,642
#6
كسم.
@kasm_kiq · 5,105
#7
unreachable
@i611e · 13,211
#8
قهر 🏴 .
@assshkp · 2,856
#9
هَدير
@Imhadeer · 12,205
#10
بارت أُغنية 🎵
@partinmusic · 16,360
#11
حيادر
@llSPR · 19,671
#12
مِش غّريَب
@ranyaq · 8,343
#13
مَعلِش
@mx1ln · 7,439
#14
☀️🌊🌬️🪴
@luv634 · 15,699
#15
Star's girl
@squidwardFMi · 4,724
#16
A Sky Full of Stars
@the_tabarak2 · 5,328
#18
m
@sswsee · 6,200
#19
الياس
@Yasin_Kazem · 7,143
#20
888
@PYPYl2 · 12,358
#21
مُـدونه
@tabe77 · 5,339
#22
واقِع حال
@waqieeh · 8,386
#23
Typing..
@talkmoe · 4,658
#24
غيث
@itsxc7 · 12,352
#25
يوميات فتات جامعية مهرفلة
@tometo7777 · 10,803
#26
نبوىٰ
@mmmmmmmmmn19li · 7,480
#27
ربَّي لتجيبَه
@JJ2DA · 5,511
#28
ㅤㅤㅤㅤحـسن
@ooooollllleeeeeeee · 7,317
#29
Everything
@i47l0o · 1,056
#30
مُحمد
@NomadMo0 · 263 (as read 6 September 2026)
#31
No sé
@lFBCl · 3,097
#32
O²Z
@Ozm3os · 409
#33
Memeology - ميمز
@jpjjj1 · 20,551
#34
شكو ماكو | أخبار
@koktelnews · 3,791
#35
ممتتتتتتت
@batnashit0 · 69,051
#36
memes
@AliQusay0 · 7,396
#37
رأي الناس
@RN24_IQ · 225,550
#38
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,297
#39
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer
@santer_sads · 369,032
#40
منصة ابن بابل
@iraqed4 · 3,304,979
#41
ميمز - Memes
@JPJJJJ · 91,999
#42
One day
@A900lm · 3,675
#43
JAMAL
@isup2 · 6,492
#44
نيمار ابن الانبار
@iraqedu · 4,431,987
#45
wezary by A.A
@wezaryataa · 62,563
#46
Ayaat's Mind
@Ayaatsmind · 4,045
#47
الجامعات الحكومية والأهلية
@Medical_cours1 · 721,406
#48
جزيرة ابستين 🙊
@Impormems · 1,805
#49
محبّ للجَمال.
@ssssooiii · 1,070
#50
Memes
@memesxx · 23,774
#51
Memes Toxic
@bejdjskk · 8,075
#52
شبكة نيوتن التعليمية
@Newton1998 · 387,583
#53

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Repost
@viiiivil · 33,758
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 6 September 2026
Memeology - ميمز
@jpjjj1 · 20,551
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 27 September 2026
cute/ugly 🥀
@ask_33s · 24,226
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 September 2026
ميمز - Memes
@JPJJJJ · 91,999
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 16 August 2026
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 776,240
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026
ممتتتتتتت
@batnashit0 · 69,051
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 20 August 2026
شِتـاء .
@ootto · 22,828
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 19 September 2026
‏ شي مرَّة فكَّرت ؟💙🌙
@dayszahraa1 · 71,983
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 20 August 2026
القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 248,297
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
متكلمنيش
@fajer87 · 30,955
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
قُطرس :
@Qotrss · 39,263
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 31 August 2026
Memes
@memesxx · 23,774
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 17 September 2026
مينفعش
@s54ou · 43,090
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
One Last Goodbye
@lastgoodbye1 · 20,820
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 25 September 2026
مظفر النواب !
@Most102030 · 28,521
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
الجامعات الحكومية والأهلية
@Medical_cours1 · 721,406
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 August 2026
أبيات فصحى
@byat2 · 81,568
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
اقْرَأَ قَبل مَوتك !
@tkxx8 · 21,849
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Fact” (@f0ctt), 31,400 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/f0ctt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.