Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

m

@sswsee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,057subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001559048407
TypeChannel
Username@sswsee
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sswsee

Growth

6,0506,0576,053.56 August 2026 — 6,050 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,051 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,052 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,057 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,049–6,058 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:236,057+5
9 Aug 2026, 12:366,052+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:206,051+1
6 Aug 2026, 16:166,050first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.6%
avg views ÷ 6,057 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held23 (15 June 202611 August 2026)
Views total19,943
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 00:06 UTC430 viewsread 12 August 2026

ربما لم يكن الأمر بهذا السوء لو أنني وجدت شخصاً يملك ما يكفي من الحنية تمحي هذه الأحزان القاسية القاسية جداً للدرجة التي تجعلني اشعرُ بالقلق الهائل لو أن احدهم اخبرني بأنهُ يحبني للدرجة التي تجعل مني شخص لا يؤمن بحقيقة المشاعر كان الأمر سيكون اقل ألماً لو أنني وجدت يداً حنينة تُسيطر على رجفة يدي

8 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC943 viewsread 12 August 2026

فقط تركت الأمور تسير كما تُريد وجلست على العتبات أنظر بعينين فارغتين من كل شيء

6 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC≈1,300 viewsread 12 August 2026

قرر ترك ما يُحب وهذا أقسى ما قد يفعله الإنسان بنفسه أن يُغادر شيئًا كان يومًا وطنه الوحيد فقط لأن البقاء أصبح بلا جدوى

31 Jul 2026, 00:44 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 12 August 2026

ألم تشتاق إلي ؟ ‏ولو مصادفة ولو سرًّا ‏ولو كان ذلك الشوق الذي لا يُقال ‏الذي تخفيه حتى عن نفسك ‏وتنكره بلسانك ‏ ثم يعريه قلبك ‏ألم يحدث أن خانك الحنين ‏ذات مساء ‏كما يخونني كل يوم ؟

22 Jul 2026, 12:03 UTC≈3,290 viewsread 12 August 2026

يوم بصحى متقبل الوضع وست أيام بصحى اسأل نفسي هيا ليه صعبه كدا

20 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC≈3,240 viewsread 12 August 2026

لا تلتفت الوصول لم يكن معضلة أنت فقط لم تكن المقصود فالبعض تُختصر له المسافات والبعض لا يُعبر له حتى الشارع

17 Jul 2026, 20:38 UTC≈3,690 viewsread 12 August 2026

هذه المرة لن أركض ولن أرتب ولا حتى أبرر لأنني فهمت أخيرًا وإن متأخراً أن من أراد البقاء لن يضعك في موضع الاختبار

13 Jul 2026, 17:58 UTC≈4,350 viewsread 12 August 2026

مر زمن طويل يا عزيزي لم تُشاركني فيه اغانيك مرت أيام لا أعلمُ فيها شيء عن حالك أظُن إن الصمتْ لغة مُكتسبة مع الأيام ولكنني لست أحجبُ روحي عنك ولا تفكيري بك إنما أمتنع عن الكلام لأن ما أقوله ليس ما أعنيه وما أعنيه لا أقوله لك ولن اجرأُ على ذلك معك ما حيّيت

11 Jul 2026, 19:52 UTC≈3,580 viewsread 12 August 2026

هوا محدش خذ مكانك ومحدش حياخذوا حتى انت بنفسك مش هترجعلوا هيفضل فاضي كدة على طول

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @sswsee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 157,952 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 34 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

القرآن الكريم
@llquraanll · 247,256
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 August 2026
المُصْحَف
@lAlMosahfl · 770,622
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“m” (@sswsee), 6,057 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sswsee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.