Channel
@extrasexov
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
684subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002020425822 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @extrasexov |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/extrasexov |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 11:36 | 684 | -3 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 687 | -1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 688 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 690 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 693 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 696 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 696 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
272 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 149 | 54.8% | |
| 💯 | 24 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5377770341353407563 | 20 | 7.35% | |
| custom 5318938025361679130 | 14 | 5.15% | |
| custom 5323708484192063799 | 12 | 4.41% | |
| custom 5226795510685269985 | 10 | 3.68% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 3.68% | |
| 🤡 | 8 | 2.94% | |
| custom 5323287160785229188 | 7 | 2.57% | |
| custom 5391273018452366458 | 7 | 2.57% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 2.21% | |
| custom 5229150157785823939 | 5 | 1.84% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 272 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @extrasexov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ремейк х/ф «Мечтатели» случился в Нижнем Новгороде. Умеют же люди отдыхать красиво, по-белому завидую. Подписка 🤩Написать Посекретничать в чате
🤣10custom 52267955106852699853custom 53189380253616791303custom 53232871607852291882custom 53912730184523664582custom 53777703413534075631
Я, когда гуляю по злачным районам, прячу в этом кармашке наличку и банковские карты. Очень удобно. Подписка 🤩 Написать Посекретничать в чате
🤣12💯2custom 53777703413534075632custom 53232871607852291881custom 53237084841920637991
Очень рад за эту красивую пару. Но! Считаю, что предложение руки и сердца – вопрос крайне интимный и должен быть озвучен тет-а-тет. А родственникам необходимо сообщать уже по факту. Но это мелочи, я так счастлив за ребят. Подписка 🤩 Написать Посекретничать в чате
🤣13custom 53189380253616791303custom 53777703413534075632
В Дьяволограме набирает силу и вот-вот готовится взлететь юноша, сообщающий миру о любви к женскому доминированию и фут-фетишу. Как можно понять из видео № 2, молодой человек одухотворился и уже устраивает на улицах фут-фетиш-патрули. С одной стороны, страна наша женская, и боготворение женщин — это наш исторический путь, а с другой — как-то не до конца православно. Наблюдаем Подписка 🤩Написать Посекретничать в ч…
🤣3🔥2💯1custom 53912730184523664581
Что за болезнь такая? Кто разбирается, экстрасексы? Подписка 🤩 Написать Посекретничать в чате
🤣10custom 53237084841920637994custom 53777703413534075632🍾1
В силу профессии меня постоянно спрашивают, будет ли мобилизация. Уважаемые подписчики, не переживайте: когда мобилизация начнётся, я вам обязательно сообщу, что она идёт.
🤣8💯7custom 53777703413534075633
А вот нечего занимать самые живописные места, да ещё и посреди основной дороги до райцентра. Подписка 🤩 Написать Посекретничать в чате
🤣13🍾2🔥2custom 53189380253616791302
Москвичи стали называть новорождённых именами персонажей древнегреческих мифов. Чувствительные к трендам столичные жители вдохновились новой «Одиссеей» и повадились называть ни в чём не повинных детишек Зевсами, Афродитами, Прометеями и Гераклами, Дионисами. В Москве нашлась аж 81 Афина и Одиссеи в количестве двух единиц. Самый популярный на данный момент персонаж — Агамемнон — не обнаружен, но это пока. Подписка…
🤣11custom 53237084841920637993💯2custom 52291501577858239392🍾1
Сёстры, трижды подумайте, перед тем как показать похотливому мужику свою носогубку. Этот позор не смыть. Подписка 🤩Написать Посекретничать в чате
🤣11🤡8🔥2💯1custom 52267955106852699851
Женщины постоянно спешат с выводами. Например, эта девушка буквально чудом не оступилась и не разрушила счастливый брак. В следующий раз будет внимательнее. Подписка 🤩 Написать Посекретничать в чате
🤣14💯4custom 53777703413534075633custom 53189380253616791301custom 53912730184523664581
Мне не стыдно признаться, что нравится Екатерина Стриженова в своих ранних работах – до «Первого канала». Подписка 🤩Написать Посекретничать в чате
custom 52267955106852699856🤣3custom 53189380253616791303
Вступил в спор со своей знакомой. Говорит, что в России правит тоталитарный культ худобы, с чем я не согласен. Покидайте в комментарии фото девушек, соответствующих вашему вкусу, – хочу измерить температуру по больнице. Не стесняйтесь, вас здесь никто не осудит и не осадит.
🤣8custom 53232871607852291884custom 53777703413534075633custom 53912730184523664581
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @extrasexov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“«Битва экстрасексов»” (@extrasexov), 684 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/extrasexov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.