Channel
@expertprimorye
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,991subscribers
-3,301 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001087097973 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @expertprimorye |
| Created | 7 January 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 46 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/expertprimorye |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 10 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @expertprimorye/2881 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 00:42 UTC | @dfonews/499556 Aug 2026, 01:28 UTC | 1.00 | 46 minutes |
| @expertprimorye/2986 · this entry22 Oct 2026, 07:43 UTC | @nedebri2/3354922 Oct 2026, 08:24 UTC | 1.00 | 40 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @dfonews | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 59 minutes | this entry (18–0) |
| @nedebri2 | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 1.7 hours | this entry (10–0) |
| @nedalniy_vostok | 7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 21 hours | this entry (7–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 81 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 10 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @expertprimorye — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
12,300 average views per post against 8,084 subscribers — an engagement rate of 151.9%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 22 of 22 published in the window (0 exact, 22 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 270,130 |
| Mature posts only | 156.8% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 8,084 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1% |
| Position in cohort | 99.774th percentile · 11.1× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.049% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Russian · 100.0% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_source · err_high, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 10 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 05:20 | 7,991 | -93 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 10:29 | 8,084 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:41 | 8,091 | -94 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 8,185 | -370 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 18:21 | 8,555 | -151 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 8,706 | -210 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 8,916 | -221 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 9,137 | -127 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 01:39 | 9,264 | -140 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 9,404 | -153 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:41 | 9,557 | +654 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 8,903 | +934 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 7,969 | +265 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 7,704 | -3,248 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 10,952 | -45 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 10,997 | -33 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 11,030 | -39 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:00 | 11,069 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 11,079 | -5 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:35 | 11,084 | first reading |
82 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 82 (23 July 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 358,140 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Новый руководитель Приморского края К. Шестаков по итогам первых недель работы вошел в топ-3 наиболее упоминаемых глав субъектов ДФО. Кадровое решение Президента Росии вызвало повышенное внимание и активное обсуждение в СМИ и новых медиа — как в силу стратегической значимости Приморья, так и в силу нетипичного для региона сценария назначения. Как уже отмечали эксперты, впервые в постсоветской истории Приморья на пов…
Первые шаги К. Хижинского в новой должности носят подчеркнуто хозяйственный характер: и.о. Главы Владивостока знакомится с работой муниципальных предприятий, инспектирует ход дорожных работ и восстановление благоустройства после проведения ремонтов на коммуникациях. В основе многих текущих поручений – обращения горожан в социальных сетях, как это практиковалось все последние годы. По мнению экспертов, наличие у К. Х…
По данным министерства туризма Приморского края, на данный момент туристический налог по ставке 1-2% действует в 20 муниципальных образованиях региона, а поступления в бюджеты за 9 мес. 2026г. составили около 75 млн рублей. Кроме того, ряд территорий планирует ввести данный налог с 2027г. Эксперты отмечают, что муниципалитеты Приморья активно используют новую возможность для пополнения местных бюджетов, которую им н…
В результате судебных процессов последних лет практически вся территория набережной Спортивной гавани Владивостока вновь оказалась в собственности государства, а главное – у нее появилась понятная концепция развития. После возвращения земельных участков, ранее контролировавшихся структурами экс-главы Владивостока В. Николаева, появление иска о демонтаже расположенного на них объекта было лишь вопросом времени. Конеч…
Эксперты отмечают понятную и принципиальную позицию врио Губернатора Приморского края К. Шестакова о недопустимости сокращения педагогов. Заявление на эту тему прозвучало на фоне оптимизации управленческого звена учреждений образования, которое в ряде муниципалитетов вызвало обеспокоенность и со стороны педагогического сообщества. Однако из слов руководителя региона следует, что речь идет лишь о переформатировании ст…
Экономический эффект от применения преференциальных режимов на Дальнем Востоке и в Арктике (ТОР, СПВ, АЗРФ) на данный момент составляет 610 млрд рублей, что существенно превышает затраты на создание и развитие соответствующих механизмов поддержки. При этом первые резиденты данных префрежимов после завершения льготного периода платят налоги в полном объеме, что, безусловно, оказывает дополнительную поддержку региональ…
Эксперты отмечают, что одним из первых шагов О. Кожемяко в новой должности стало ознакомление со спецификой арктических регионов, поскольку функции Вице-премьера РФ подразумевают кураторство не только дальневосточных, но и арктических субъектов. Специальные экономические режимы и меры поддержки в последние годы также вводились в формате "ДФО+Арктика", и сейчас важно оценить их эффективность. Следует выделить и еще д…
Назначение К. Хижинского и.о. Главы Владивостока в целом повторяет траекторию К. Шестакова в 2021г. – на должность главы города вновь заходит молодой и энергичный человек, при этом уже имеющий большой опыт работы в Правительстве Приморского края. Это значит, что региональный и муниципальный уровень власти и дальше будут действовать как единая команда, что позволит обеспечить преемственность в ключевых проектах и сохр…
Сохранение "дальневосточной" ипотеки без изменения ее базовых условий по-прежнему позволяет жителям Дальнего Востока улучшать свои жилищные условия: в 2026 г. объемы ипотечного кредитования в макрорегионе выросли почти на четверть. Отметим, что указанная статистика охватывает период с января по август, т.е. еще до ужесточения условий по другой популярной льготной программе – "семейной" ипотеке, поэтому можно предполо…
На встрече с Президентом 22 октября врио Губернатора К. Шестаков назвал одним из приоритетов молодежную политику – создание условий для того, чтобы молодые приморцы и те, кто приезжает в край получать образование, связывали свое будущее с Приморьем. Поэтому одним из первых шагов, которые К. Шестаков инициировал в новой должности, станет создание Совета, в который войдут представители студенческой молодежи. Его главн…
В Приморье в отношении новых правил реализации вейпов, которые полностью запретят их продажу в течение 5 лет, решено не просто провести предписанную законодательством оценку регулирующего воздействия, но и активно привлечь к этому процессу общественность. Инициативу активно поддержали различные информационные ресурсы, в том числе на площадке Telegram, чтобы об обсуждении узнало максимальное количество людей. https:/…
Эксперты отмечают, что поддержка ТОС в Приморском крае не сводится только к предоставлению грантов на благоустройство придомовых или общественных территорий, а люди уже на этапе подготовки заявки продумывают варианты их будущего использования. Созданные по инициативе граждан площадки впоследствии становятся местами проведения локальных мероприятий, а если смотреть шире — центрами общения для соседей по дому или даже…
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @expertprimorye. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@expertprimorye edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 28 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 23 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эксперты Приморского края” (@expertprimorye), 7,991 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/expertprimorye.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.