Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Евген Маркович | БизнесБомж

@evgen_markovich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001928273637
TypeChannel
Username@evgen_markovich
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/evgen_markovich

Growth

7312 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 73 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 06:06 — 73 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:1613 Aug 2026, 06:06
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:0673no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:1673first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 14 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3758.7%
2641.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 31 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 May 2025, 19:56 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

О, шалом! Конец месяца, а это значит можно подвести небольшие итоги. На работе дикая запара, но я с ней пытаюсь справляться. В жизни в целом все хорошо, кроме бессонницы и постоянных нервов (работа, работа..) А теперь к интересному… Медиа-пространство. ТГ: Отписки с этого акаунта меня нисколько не смущают, потому что это норма🤯 Но и времени постить что-то у меня особо нету. Остальные мои проекты стоят в режиме бе

🔥4

16 May 2025, 19:02 UTC80 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем шалом. Простите, что не постил ничего стоящего, работа + не было никаких идей для постов. Но я придумал, о чем я буду тут рассказывать. Большинство собралось здесь, чтобы узнать, как и на чем можно делать деньги. Я прав? Так вот, у меня появилась идея вернуться в Т-Т с контентом, который я делал 4 года назад. Это аниме нарезки. И конечно же я это делаю с целью монетизироваться своё хобби. С завтрашнего дня

🔥3

15 May 2025, 13:02 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @fashionkids_modelsPoll

Открываем голосование второго тура! Выбираем 3 фаворитов из этих городов 👆🏼

  1. Чита22%
  2. Саранск2%
  3. Архангельск3%
  4. Волгоград9%
  5. Оренбург23%
  6. Краснодар (Оренбургская 1/1)16%
  7. Калуга18%
  8. Белгород5%
  9. Магнитогорск2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🔥1

15 May 2025, 13:02 UTC47 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Проголосуйте за Волгоград, плз Не знаю зачем, но это жизненно необходимо

🔥1

18 Apr 2025, 14:26 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Внук - лучшая защита от мошенников БизнесБомж

4

18 Apr 2025, 11:05 UTC99 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Тут даже описания не нужно БизнесБомж

6

17 Apr 2025, 08:41 UTC63 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Утренняя подборочка, которая меня улыбнула в этот день БизнесБомж

5

17 Apr 2025, 08:36 UTC75 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

По словам 4ch Сегодня день денег Поздравляю всех и желаю финансового благополучия Отправляй этого денежного кота всем, кому желаешь финансового благополучия. БизнесБомж

5

16 Apr 2025, 16:02 UTC59 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Что убираем?

  1. Мемы0%
  2. Новости13%
  3. Оценки0%
  4. Оставь все, интересно все88%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Apr 2025, 16:01 UTC66 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что дальше? Если ты тут впервые и не понимаешь, что тут происходит, прочитай закрепленное сообщение, который было выше. Сам контент превратится в сборную солянку из подборки мемов, которые меня рассмешили, новостей, которые меня как-то задели и рецензии на фильмы, книги, музыку и каналы (конечно же с плюсами и минусами) Превращусь в твоего карманного критика. Снизу сделаю голосование на 24 часа, в котором ты можеш

🔥5

16 Apr 2025, 15:36 UTC51 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Последний пост этой истории Сейчас я работаю администратором в общежитиях. В основном занимаюсь бумагами, но также выезжаю в разные рабочие общежития, в которых сижу смену администратора. Плюсы, минусы и зарплату здесь писать не буду. Во-первых я еще не проанализировал путь, который прохожу сейчас. Во-вторых зарплата намного больше, чем зарабатывал до этого, и счастье любит тишину. График работы с выходными, чему

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @evgen_markovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 May 2025, 13:02 UTCFinal Results14,600 voters approx.

Открываем голосование второго тура! Выбираем 3 фаворитов из этих городов 👆🏼

  1. Чита22%
  2. Саранск2%
  3. Архангельск3%
  4. Волгоград9%
  5. Оренбург23%
  6. Краснодар (Оренбургская 1/1)16%
  7. Калуга18%
  8. Белгород5%
  9. Магнитогорск2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

16 Apr 2025, 16:02 UTCAnonymous Poll8 voters

Что убираем?

  1. Мемы0%
  2. Новости13%
  3. Оценки0%
  4. Оставь все, интересно все88%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2025 to 31 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,007,985 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Евген Маркович | БизнесБомж” (@evgen_markovich), 73 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evgen_markovich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.