Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

eve eleidan

@eveeleidan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

463subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001828549551
TypeChannel
Username@eveeleidan
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eveeleidan

Growth

463464463.56 Aug 2026, 19:49 — 464 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:50 — 464 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:30 — 463 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:497 Aug 2026, 15:30
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 463–464 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 15:30463-1
6 Aug 2026, 19:50464no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:49464first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

710 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥30843.4%
19126.9%
💘608.45%
😱385.35%
🍓334.65%
🙏283.94%
💋233.24%
🌚141.97%
🍌50.704%
🔥50.704%
🤯50.704%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 710reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eveeleidan. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 14 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 May 2026, 13:20 UTC381 views67 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

рисовала подруге штуку для подарка. она просила что-нибудь из атрибутики драгонаги раскидать на рисунке, я раскинула Лёлю и Зеврана :D от скетча до финала)

47❤‍🔥12🍓6💘2

16 Feb 2026, 21:42 UTC845 views75 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я нашла арт в зин двухлетней давности я думала, что навсегда его потеряла вместе со старым ноутбуком 😩 помнится, я пыталась косить под стиль драгонажьих карт, но у меня не вышло

❤‍🔥51🙏1310🍓1

14 Feb 2026, 13:05 UTC861 views65 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

my content may be low, but my love for u isn't 🤩 from: ива to: папищики фотограф: LONGROADPHOTOGRAPHY костюм: Пошивная Юмэ парик: senika.studio #thewolfamongus #fables #cosplay

41❤‍🔥14🍓10

14 Feb 2026, 09:01 UTC505 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

у меня не было Бигби, чтобы сделать романтичные фотографии. поэтому романтика у нас сегодня вот такая будет ❤️ фотограф: LONGROADPHOTOGRAPHY костюм: Пошивная Юмэ парик: senika.studio #thewolfamongus #fables #cosplay

❤‍🔥36💘7🌚4🍓31

12 Feb 2026, 18:17 UTC494 views62 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Я кое-что в итоге так сюда и не скинула 🍎🍎🍎 I am not yours to lose. 🐺🐺🐺 фотограф: LONGROADPHOTOGRAPHY костюм: Пошивная Юмэ парик: senika.studio #thewolfamongus #fables #cosplay

💘448🔥5🍓3❤‍🔥2

12 Feb 2026, 17:49 UTC462 views52 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😳 здрасте. простите что пропала я была больна на голову я готова снова сидеть тут и быть красивой

❤‍🔥42💘7🍓3

12 Jan 2026, 20:46 UTC693 views54 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я приболела немного, социальная батарейка всё ещё ноль, работать вообще не хочется( в общем пока что этот год мне не нравится 😫 тяжко как-то зато я вот закончила арт для победительницы лотереи. всегда боялась рисовать крылья, так что рада, когда просят что-то подобное, для меня это практика 🥰 еще завершила вторую работу в зин и легла в сторону остальных коммишей, на неделе всем заказавшим отпишусь с набросками, если

❤‍🔥33💋10🙏82🍓1

9 Jan 2026, 20:01 UTC628 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

в комментариях 🌸

❤‍🔥14🌚10

8 Jan 2026, 09:54 UTC661 views59 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

процесс в зин 🌸 забавно, мне сначала эта работа вообще не нравилась и я была очень собой разочарована. а теперь я докрашиваю и внезапно мне кажется, что это одна из моих самых удачных работ за последние месяцы

35❤‍🔥17🍌5🍓2

7 Jan 2026, 13:21 UTC619 views56 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟 Hehehe... Ready to get cuffed? Give me your hands~ Фотограф: LONGROADPHOTOGRAPHY #zzz #cosplay #janedoe

❤‍🔥4311🍓2

4 Jan 2026, 22:25 UTC633 views43 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😒😒😒😒 ну я сама виновата я сама плачу за интернет

😱38🤯5

4 Jan 2026, 10:23 UTC626 views42 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

я вышла из ананасовой комы, начинаю работать над заказами 🌸 вот нарисовала своего самого любимого ребенка из хср, чтобы разрисовать руку 💕 мой год начался с кучи инцельских дикпиков в личку в твиттере и ии-генерациями со мной а как ваши дела??

34❤‍🔥7🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @eveeleidan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 897,755 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“eve eleidan” (@eveeleidan), 463 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eveeleidan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.