Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for кратц к.м.

Channel

кратц к.м.

@kris_kratz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

47subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002225428007
TypeChannel
Username@kris_kratz
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/kris_kratz

Growth

476 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–48 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 13:1847no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:4947first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
43
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

160 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8855.0%
🥰2213.8%
🍌138.13%
❤‍🔥116.88%
🍓116.88%
🔥106.25%
🕊31.88%
💘21.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 September 2025 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Oct 2025, 09:58 UTC252 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

рацио сегодня дикий огурец (версия 2024 года 🥀🥀)

16🥰6🔥3🍌2🍓2

3 Oct 2025, 09:56 UTC789 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ах да, мой любимый момент в сюжетке пенаконии

17❤‍🔥8🕊3🥰3🍓2🍌1

2 Oct 2025, 13:27 UTC122 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🩵🩵

11❤‍🔥1🍌1🔥1🥰1

24 Sept 2025, 16:35 UTC124 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @dangengzinePhoto

[Кабина Экспресса. Март-7 стоит на ящике с принтами, размахивая свежеотпечатанным списком. Дань Хэн прислонился к стеллажу с архивами, скрестив руки]. Март-7 (торжественно, словно зачитывая указ): Объявляю экстренный сбор! Отбор пройден, шум стих... и наш экипаж пополнился новыми лицами! 🐉Художник обложки: lemon owl 🐉Приглашенные художники: Пельмышка Ottozs WHITELORD Грима здесь рисует 🐉Художники, прошедшие отб

3🍌1

24 Sept 2025, 16:35 UTC103 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🐉🐉 буду работать над картинкой для этого зина!!

3

24 Sept 2025, 09:48 UTC121 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

есть ещё вариант с драматичным оранжевым 💥💥

🔥6🥰4🍌1

22 Sept 2025, 12:41 UTC112 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

почти закончила со всеми заказами! 🌌🌌 а в ближайшее время хочу попробовать красиво отфотографировать традишку ✍️✍️✍️✍️

7❤‍🔥2💘2🍌1

11 Sept 2025, 17:47 UTC288 views24 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

а ещё!! у меня сегодня день рождения 🎉🎉 как принято в наших русских деревнях — лучший подарок для художника это репост его работ, поэтому буду рада, если вы поделитесь с кем-нибудь моими картинками сегодня!

18🍌3🥰3

11 Sept 2025, 17:34 UTC100 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

вот уже третий год подряд пытаюсь закончить этот арт 🥀🥀 одна реакция на этот пост и я доделаю его до конца месяца

13🍌2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @kris_kratz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,456,658 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“кратц к.м.” (@kris_kratz), 47 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kris_kratz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.