Channel
@evaassociation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
463subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001656346124 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @evaassociation |
| Created | 15 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/evaassociation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 463 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 462 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 462 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (28 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 557 |
| Reactions total | 60 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
60 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 30.0% | |
| custom 5278699005046437145 | 10 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 10.0% | |
| custom 5210744041079063997 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5199412938099666948 | 2 | 3.33% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 3.33% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ну что, когда вы в последний раз сдавали анализ на ВИЧ? 🤨 За 15 лет работы одни из самых частых ответов на этот вопрос где-то между «нууу, давно» и «вроде когда-то сдавал… или это был гепатит?». Так, конечно, дело не пойдет. Решили собрать честную статистику (отвечайте в анонимном опросе выше) и заодно немного подтолкнуть тех, кто вечно откладывает: если вы давно не проверялись или никогда этого не делали — напомин…
👍3❤2🔥2
Вы когда-нибудь сдавали анализ на ВИЧ❓
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Август — последний месяц лета. Кто-то возвращается из отпусков, кто-то готовится к новому учебному году. Но наша работа не останавливается: мобильный пункт продолжает выезжать в города и поселки Ленинградской области. 🗺 Где именно будет стоять мобильный пункт? Точные адреса, даты и время — на фото или в нашей группе ВКонтакте в разделе с расписанием. 🚍 Что можно сделать в нашем мобильном пункте? — бесплатно и анони…
👍3❤2👀2
Когда человек узнает о хроническом диагнозе, мир часто становится тесным. Он сжимается до квартиры, поликлиники и бесконечных «что теперь?». Появляется страх: спорт — не для меня. Мое тело «не то». Начинать уже поздно. Или просто нет сил. Мы в Ассоциации «Е.В.А.» знаем: это не так. Поэтому и сделали проект «Идем тренить». В карточках рассказали подробнее о проекте: кто ведет тренировки, как все устроено. «Идем трен…
❤3🔥3custom 51994129380996669482
Проект «Забота о главном» завершен. И мы им очень гордимся💞 За 11 месяцев проекта мы поддержали 231 молодую женщину с ВИЧ и 103 их партнеров и родственников! И вот самые впечатляющие результаты, которые говорят сами за себя: — Регулярный прием АРВТ вырос с 2% до 87%. — Посещаемость СПИД-центра — с 4% до 93%. — Число женщин, нашедших постоянную работу, — с 22% до 47%. Мы сопровождали к врачам, помогали с документам…
🔥5custom 52786990050464371454🥰2
Иногда достаточно одной маленькой помощи, чтобы у мамы с ВИЧ появилась возможность просто спокойно обнять своего малыша🧑🍼 Мы в «Е.В.А.» каждый день помогаем женщинам, живущим с ВИЧ: обеспечиваем заменителями грудного молока, поддерживаем эмоционально, предоставляем психологическую поддержку, равные консультации и просто находимся рядом, когда страшно или тяжело. Сейчас нам особенно нужна ваша поддержка — чтобы не о…
❤5❤🔥4🥰2
Вы еще не устали от наших новостей про гепатит С за эту неделю? 😆 Мы точно нет. Потому что знаем: чем чаще мы говорим о гепатите С, тем меньше вокруг него страха, мифов и стигмы. И тем больше людей узнают главное: гепатит С сегодня лечится. Бесплатно. За 8–12 недель. В завершение недели, посвященной Всемирному дню борьбы с гепатитом, мы публикуем короткий ролик-инфографику. В нем — все самое главное: как передается…
❤3custom 52786990050464371453custom 52107440410790639972
Сегодня, во Всемирный день борьбы с гепатитом, Собака.ru выпустили большой материал о том, как лечится гепатит С сегодня и почему мы все еще боимся того, чего давно не существует. В центре — история Марии, которая вылечилась от гепатита С с двух попыток. И экспертный комментарий нашего координатора проектов Дарьи Савостеенко — о том, как не потеряться на пути к лечению, какие мифы до сих пор живы и почему лечиться н…
❤3custom 52786990050464371453custom 52107440410790639972
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @evaassociation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы когда-нибудь сдавали анализ на ВИЧ❓
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 340,203 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ассоциация «Е.В.А.»” (@evaassociation), 463 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evaassociation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.