Recorded in 2019 as “Euroradio” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,369–8,424 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:05
8,375
-12
12 Aug 2026, 08:27
8,387
-14
9 Aug 2026, 08:12
8,401
-11
6 Aug 2026, 18:10
8,412
-6
6 Aug 2026, 03:02
8,418
no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:06
8,418
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.9%
avg views ÷ 8,375 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.40%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
129
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
129 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
150,122
Reactions total
3,603
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
18m 17s
Average length
1m 13s
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,087 reactions across 109 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
622
20.1%
👍
504
16.3%
🤡
385
12.5%
🔥
263
8.52%
😢
255
8.26%
💔
209
6.77%
🤬
141
4.57%
😁
133
4.31%
💩
107
3.47%
🤔
76
2.46%
🤣
66
2.14%
🙏
42
1.36%
🥰
36
1.17%
🤮
31
1.00%
👏
30
0.972%
😱
29
0.939%
🙈
25
0.81%
🥴
23
0.745%
💊
14
0.454%
🥱
13
0.421%
23 further kinds
83
2.69%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 129 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,603reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"Чаму ўлады пайшлі такім банальным шляхам?". Беларусы і беларускі актыўна абмяркоўваюць апошнюю прапанову па падвышэнні нараджальнасці — прывязаць памер дапамогі на дзіця да трох гадоў да даходаў сям'і.
Людзям падаецца, што матэрыяльныя стымулы — не галоўнае, што стрымлівае нараджальнасць у Беларусі. Асабліва калі казаць пра людзей з высокім даходам — а менавіта яны і адчуюць на сабе станоўчы эфект ад новаўвядзення.…
Стаўленне польскіх уладаў да беларусаў, якія падаюцца на міжнародную абарону, змянілася. "Проста" ўдзел у пратэстах 2020-га ці данаты на карысць фондаў, абвешчаных "экстрэмісцкімі", ужо не пераконваюць.
І што тады рабіць? Вось парады ад адваката Міхаіла Кірылюка.
А цалкам сённяшні стрым з ім глядзіце тут: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QLWG8kalhk
"Гэта частка нашай гісторыі, нашай памяці і нашай беларускай годнасці". Завершаны мантаж абноўленага помніка Тадэвушу Касцюшку ў швейцарскім Залатурне. Камень і шыльду для яго прывезлі з Беларусі.
Урачыстае адкрыццё плануецца на кастрычнік 2026 года.
Праектам займаліся Фонд Марыі Магдалены Радзівіл і ініцыятыва MALDZIS. Быў абвешчаны дабрачынны збор, які беларусы актыўна падтрымалі.
Літва плануе капаць равы і аднаўляць балоты на межах з Беларуссю і Расіяй. На сродкі контрмабільнасці плануюць патраціць 50 млн еўра
Ці будуць на мяжы з Расіяй запускаць у равы кракадзілаў — не паведамляецца: https://euroradio.fm/litva-uzmacnyae-abaronu-na-mezhakh-z-belarussyu-i-rasiyay-adnaulyae-baloty
Спасылка, якая працуе без VPN
Папулярызатар найноўшай гісторыі Беларусі Павел Валатовіч працягвае другі сезон свайго праекта #IMBY. У ім ён расказвае пра 2000-я, і цяпер дайшоў да 2006-га года.
Падпольныя канцэрты, Аляксандр Мілінкевіч і Плошча-2006, песня "Слухай бацьку" ад Анатоля Ярмоленкі, спадарожнік "БелКА", новы будынак Нацыянальнай бібліятэкі, беларус гуляе ў фінале Лігі чэмпіёнаў... Гэта ўсё было, і было ўжо 20 гадоў таму! Глядзіце тут:…
Прэзыдэнтам Венгрыі стаў звольнены пры Орбане старшыня Вярхоўнага суду. @radiosvaboda звяртае ўвагу на словы, якія 73-гадовы Андраш Бака сказаў у сваёй першай па абранні прамове:
- Дэмакратыя разбураецца не толькі тады, калі нехта перавышае свае паўнамоцтвы, але і тады, калі грамадства прызвычайваецца, што такое можа адбывацца
- Немагчыма будаваць супольную будучыню так, каб грамадзяне бачылі адзін у адным ворагаў
…
“Было прыемна, што гвалт спыніўся на нейкі час”. Дзяўчыны, якія ў жніўні 2020 года пачалі жаночыя маршы, расказалі @euroradio, як гэта было.
Ранкам стварылі чат. Пад канец дня ў ім было ўжо каля 3 600 чалавек: https://euroradio.fm/bylo-pryemna-shto-gvalt-spyniusya-na-neyki-chas-yak-pachalisya-zhanochyya-marshy-u-2020-godze
Спасылка, якая працуе без VPN
Адзін з гродзенскіх квізаў абвясціў пра вяртанне. "Мазгабойня" паставіла гульні на 16-га і 20-га жніўня.
Арганізатары не паведамляюць, як у іх гэта атрымалася. Варыянтаў, па-сутнасці, два: ці яны пагадзіліся з тым, што іх квіз — масавае мерапрыемства, і выканалі ўсе фармальнасці, ці ўлады крыху расціснулі гайкі і зрабілі для іх палёгку.
Напачатку жніўня арганізатарам паб-квізаў у Гродне абвясцілі, што проста так бо…
Былога дырэктара буйнога аргапрамысловага комплекса будуць судзіць за хабар у крыптавалюце. За "вырашэнне пытанняў" ён атрымаў 365 030 токенаў USDT.
А гэта рэальна шмат: https://euroradio.fm/byloga-gendyrektara-aat-belavezhski-buduc-sudzic-za-khabar-u-kryptavalyuce
Спасылка, якая працуе без VPN
У Мінску выратавальнікі спусцілі на зямлю аператара вежавага крана. На вышыні ў 30 метраў у мужчыны закружылася галава, і ён не мог спусціцца самастойна.
Давялося карыстацца альпінісцкім рыштункам. Рабочага шпіталізавалі.
Гукі вайны: ад дронаў у Германіі да магчымых удараў па прадпрыемствах у Беларусі. Стрым з палітычным аглядальнікам Аляксандрам Фрыдманам
Праз атакі БПЛА спыняў сваю працу пункт пропуску на… беларуска-расійскай мяжы. Як бачым, і мяжа з Расіяй у Беларусі па-ранейшаму ёсць, і пункты пропуску на ёй ізноў працуюць, і невядомыя дроны там трапляюць у грузавыя машыны з прычэпамі. Падрабязнасцей інцыдэнту пакуль мала, але ві…
Дзяржаўныя ўстановы праігнаравалі смерць трэнера Мікалая Казекі. Чалавек прынёс беларускаму фрыстайлу сусветную славу — а яго няма ні для Нацыянальнага алімпійскага камітэта, ні для Міністэрства спорту, ні нават для Беларускай федэрацыі фрыстайла, заўважылі @pozirkonline.
Створаная Мікалаем Казекам школа фрыстайлу лічылася адной з найлепшых у свеце. Яго гадаванцы прынеслі Беларусі восем алімпійскіх медалёў. Аднак на…
😢27🤬7💩5❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @euroradio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ці цікавіць вас тое, што адбываецца ў беларускіх дэмсілах?
так (я знаходжуся ў РБ)17%
так (я не знаходжуся ў РБ)51%
не (я знаходжуся ў РБ)7%
не (я не знаходжуся ў РБ)28%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 9,021 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Зеркало | Новости @zerkalo_io · 105,572 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
Onliner @onlinerby · 148,974 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
NEXTA @nexta_tv · 104,054 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
6 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
2020(en.wikipedia.org) “…/t.me/euroradio/5424|access-date=August 22, 2020|archive-date=September 13, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200913042613/https://t.me/…” read 16 August 2026
Terror Battalion(en.wikipedia.org) “…[[Volodymyr Zelensky]] during his visit to Kherson.{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/euroradio/36977|title=Еўрарадыё {{!}} Еврорадио|website=Telegram|access-date=31…” read 16 August 2026
TUT.BY(ru.wikipedia.org) “…[[Чернявская, Юлия Виссарионовна|Юлии Чернявской]]{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/euroradio/17830 |title=Список собственников tut.by с указанием доли в процентах…” read 16 August 2026
Протесты в Беларуси (2020—2021)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…20-09-20|access-date=|url-status=live}}{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/euroradio/4715|title=⚡️ Мінск|lang=be|author=Вайтовіч…” read 16 August 2026
Терор (батальйон)(uk.wikipedia.org) “…Володимира Зеленського під час його візиту до Херсона{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/euroradio/36977|title=Еўрарадыё {{!}} Еврорадио|website=Telegram|access-…” read 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Еўрарадыё | Еврорадио” (@euroradio), 8,375 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/euroradio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.