Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Тряпки

@etotryapki

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,487subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001527153907
TypeChannel
Username@etotryapki
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/etotryapki

Growth

3,4823,4873,484.57 August 2026 — 3,482 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,486 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,485 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,487 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,481–3,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:283,487+2
11 Aug 2026, 05:513,485-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:073,486+4
7 Aug 2026, 06:163,482first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.4%
avg views ÷ 3,487 subscribers
Avg views / post
643
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held10 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total6,426
Reactions total288
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

288 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16958.7%
🔥4816.7%
😍279.38%
👍248.33%
👀103.47%
❤‍🔥41.39%
👏20.694%
🤡20.694%
🤔10.347%
🥴10.347%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 288reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC495 views43 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я считаю, что сейчас хорошее время для запуска бренда с нуля и вот почему 1. Рынок и потребитель изменились, правил больше нет и это продолжится какое-то время, пока не сформируются новые. А это значит что можно стать законодателем и создать свои правила. 2. Надежды на легкие деньги тоже больше нет. А это значит, что мыслить перспективой бизнеса на годы - новая норма, которая заставляет не бездумно отшивать новую к

24👍17🤡2

4 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC469 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Больше всего заинтересовали, конечно, директора по продукту и визуальному мерчандайзингу: коллеги, признавайтесь, у кого зпшка от 750к в месяц? 😅 Коллеги из Lime, вы не выпендривайтесь, про вас мы все знаем. Вы такие одни на рынке 🤪

👀101

4 Aug 2026, 11:27 UTC538 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @retailfashionPhoto

Доход гендиректоров в fashion – от 50 до 100 млн рублей в год Продолжаем обсуждать зарплаты топ-менеджеров с экспертами. Сегодня пригласили в рубрику Анну Сус, руководителя практики «Потребительские товары» в консалтинговой компании The Edgers, которая занимается подбором топ-менеджеров. ▶️Насколько выросли доходы топ-менеджеров в fashion? Доходы продолжают расти, но темпы изменились: уже не более 20% в год, как э

4🤔1

4 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC481 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Настроение - напомнить про свой профессиональный путь В сентябре этого года будет 14 лет, как я работаю в российской модной индустрии. Я начинала ассистентом специалиста по закупкам в компании Podium Market (мультибрендовый универмаг в среднем ценовом сегменте). Ориентир был на нестандартный бренд-микс. Bimba y Lola, Maje, Sandro, Bronx, Steve Madden и многие другие бренды впервые появились в России именно в Podium

33🔥11

1 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC596 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @umagazine_russiaPhoto

Чем сегодня является мода — искусством, маркетингом или сложной гибридной системой, в которой эти понятия неразделимы? На эту тему в рамках рубрики #мода_и_искусство мы поговорили с Анной Якимовой — специалистом по ассортиментной стратегии модных брендов. — Мода — это искусство или маркетинг? Как вы сами отвечаете на этот вопрос и почему? Для меня мода — это, прежде всего, сложный бизнес. Основная его сложность за

14❤‍🔥4

30 Jul 2026, 06:41 UTC694 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Недавно занималась мониторингом ассортимента российских брендов (не крупных, скорее нишевых) и увидела ряд одинаковых ошибок в ассортиментной стратегии. Хочу поделиться с вами, потому что они напрямую влияют на результаты продаж. 1. Ценовой сегмент бренда. Если бренд называет себя премиальным, это значит, что его ценовая политика лежит именно в этом сегменте. Платья за 50 000 и за 9 000 внутри одного бренда вызываю

30🔥9👍7

29 Jul 2026, 06:30 UTC686 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dilara Findikoglu, Bridal Collection Если замуж, то как-то так, наверное

14🔥5🥴1

27 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC775 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В этот понедельник в очередной раз хочу напомнить, что SKU (stock keeping unit) - это устоявшийся международный термин, который обозначает единицу складского учета А единица складского учета это уникальный идентификатор, который включае в себя артикул, цвет и РАЗМЕР. Не артикул сам себе, не артикул и цвет, а артикул, цвет и размер. В какой момент российская модная индустрия пошла «против шерсти» и начала подразумев

33

26 Jul 2026, 15:46 UTC835 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dressedpeople

Что происходит в индустрии прямо сейчас? Решила пообщаться со специалистами из индустрии и понять, что происходит в российском модном бизнесе прямо сейчас. Моя первая гостья – Анна Якимова, эксперт по ассортиментной стратегии, бизнес-консультант, преподаватель, автор телеграм-канала @etotryapki С какими запросами к вам сейчас приходят бренды? Я бы выделила две основные категории запросов: оптимизация ассортиментно

🔥118👏2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @etotryapki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 586,865 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Тряпки” (@etotryapki), 3,487 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etotryapki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.