Channel
@espanolconseries
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
622subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001723716776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @espanolconseries |
| Description | 👋 Alejandra Живу яркую жизнь c испанским ❤️ 💃 Profe МГПУ 🤩 DELE C2 📚Читаем Гарри Поттера (1,2): https://t.me/harrypotterespanol 🎬Курсы по сериалам (B1+): 🗝 El Ministerio del Tiempo 🔍 Los misterios de Laura 🐕 Sabuesos 📸 Интервью с hispanohablantes |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/espanolconseries |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 622 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:01 | 622 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 June 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,828 |
| Reactions total | 108 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
290 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 160 | 55.2% | |
| 🔥 | 46 | 15.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 25 | 8.62% | |
| 💔 | 19 | 6.55% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 6.55% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 5.52% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 290reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так выглядит стол счастливого человека! Мой драгоценный муж сделал так, чтобы эти два увесистых тома наконец материализовались в моей библиотеке ❤️🔥 Я вам от всей души ЗАПРЕЩАЮ читать эти романы самостоятельно. Приходите на чтения ко мне. Такого количества отсылок, пасхалок вы сами никогда не найдете, а без них не сможете насладиться чтением на 100%. Начинается заключительная неделя для первого потока. Если ваш…
🔥14❤6
День рождения Гарри Поттера - прекрасный день для старта творческой активности под названием «Я знаю ГП назубок». Правила участия очень просты: 🧹Выбрать любимый фрагмент из книг о Гарри Поттере и выучить наизусть. Предпочтительнее делать это на иностранных языках. Я вот учу на любимом испанском. 🧹Выложить видео у себя на страничке в любой соц.сети или в истории ТГ с хэштегом #ГПназубок 🧹По желанию поделиться под э…
❤9❤🔥4🔥1
Дорогие друзья! У кого есть маленькие детки, отметьтесь, пожалуйста. Можно несколько вариантов.
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Из учебника начальной школы 1965 г. Цензура, говорили они. Испанцы такие испанцы.
😁18❤4
В последнее время вовсю тренирую свою память, повторяю стихи, выученные в школе, учу новые. Давно говорила, что если бы ГП был изначально написан на испанском, я бы знала его наизусть. Ну, а что собственно мешает выучить какие-то части на испанском (пусть это и перевод)? Решила в новом потоке чтений устроить себе этот челлендж. Выучить довольно просто, а вот рассказать, да еще на камеру - это уже другая история. Д…
❤16🔥4
💔 Ну что, теперь самое время садиться доделывать работу
💔19
Только ленивый не написал про футбол (или такой занятой, как я, хехех). Этот ЧМ прошел мимо меня, я не смотрела ни один матч. Всю информацию узнавала от мужа, который даже специально отпуск брал, чтобы иметь возможность смотреть матчи по ночам. НО! Конечно же, я не пропущу такой классный финал. Это именно тот идеальный матч, чей исход будет приятен в любом случае. Тем не менее, радоваться буду больше, если Месси во…
❤13
Ко мне приехала вот такая красота. Знаю, во многих вопросах я сильно торможу (книга была издана года 4 назад), но лучше поздно, чем никогда. Оформление - просто восторг. Показывать? Кто читал? Если кто не знает, у Татьяны Пигаревой (директора Института Сервантеса в Москве) прекрасный канал про искусство и не только.
❤21
Мы на экваторе! Прочитали половину книги и теперь постепенно движемся к финалу. Грустно оттого, что наше приключение скоро закончится, что не будет наших еженедельных встреч, разговоров, обсуждений - разумеется до тех пор, пока мне не придет очередная новая идея. Но тем не менее, я очень жду этого момента, чтобы наконец отдохнуть. Новый курс для меня - это всегда выход из зоны комфорта. Это работа над материалами…
❤8🔥3
Завтра стартуем 👍
🔥9❤1
Главный итог вечера - это не паэлья в Институте Серванетса, не фирменный шоппер с книгой в качестве подарка, а встреча с дорогой Ильдой. Я сбилась со счету, сколько лет мы не виделись. Ощущение, что до пандемии точно… Но с Ильдой всегда так уютно, как будто расстались только вчера. Кто не знает, Ильда - мой первый преподаватель-носитель испанского в университете. Моя самая первая пара испанского была именно с ней…
❤25❤🔥7🥰3
Есть у меня гипотеза (только гипотеза), что здесь мы имеем дело с метатезой - крайне любопытным явлением в языке, когда звуки внутри слова вдруг меняются местами. Наверняка, вы вспомните свой первый раз, когда услышали, как по-испански будет: крокодил 🐊 гирлянда 🎄 Алжир 🇩🇿 Во всех этих слова буквы в испанском как будто потерялись и встали не на свое место. Если люди изучают, например, параллельно английский и исп…
👍9❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @espanolconseries. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Дорогие друзья! У кого есть маленькие детки, отметьтесь, пожалуйста. Можно несколько вариантов.
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 610,115 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Español con series” (@espanolconseries), 622 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/espanolconseries.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.