Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for درباره همه چیز

Channel

درباره همه چیز

@enteqadie

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001667654819
TypeChannel
Username@enteqadie
Descriptionکانالی در باب همه چیز زندگانی روزمره ام نقدی بر روشنفکران بی وطن تا تلگرام نشینان دوره گرد
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 21 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/enteqadie

Growth

207 August 2026 — 20 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19–21 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 15:1620no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:4420first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 January 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,030
Videos
867
Links
352

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍753.8%
😁430.8%
🔥215.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2023 to 26 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jan 2025, 17:51 UTC72 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

دو ماهه جان حسین رونقی در خطر نیست، نگران شدم.

😁1

Signed sadegh pourkiany

25 Jul 2023, 18:27 UTC194 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @BehzadMehrani77

‏ا‌پوزیسیون «همبسته» و «دموکراسی‌خواه»، از طرفی معتقد است شاهزاده رضا پهلوی طبق «آمار» طرفداران اندکی دارد و عموم طرفدارانش هم افراطی هستند و از طرفی معتقد است که ایران و جهان منتظر این «همبستگی» است و اگر این همبستگی انفاق نیافتد می‌پرند بغل همین آخوندها. ‏چرا خودتان با هم همبستگی نمی‌کنید؟ پیشنهاد من این است که شما که اینهمه هستید با هم متحد شوید و‌ منتظر شاهزاده نمانید. ‏اینطوری هم باعث می‌شوید غربی‌ها با آخوندها

Signed sadegh pourkiany

26 May 2023, 22:16 UTC174 viewsread 11 August 2026
File

✅ بازخوانی مبحث «تاریخ ناموس» نوشته‌ی شروین وکیلی ▫️ماهنامه‌ی مدیریت ارتباطات، تیرماه ۱۳۹۹ گویندگان: سوسن آذیش، سوری گردان

Signed sadegh pourkiany

24 May 2023, 10:12 UTC238 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

اسلام‌ستیزان ضد پهلوی به روایت استاد مانوک خدابخشیان

👍1

Signed sadegh pourkiany

24 Mar 2023, 02:18 UTC153 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @yaddashthayesiah

قمار خطرناک شاهزاده در اکثر جوامع مدرن احزاب و جریان‌های سیاسی که «راست میانه» و «چپ میانه» نامیده می‌شوند، نقشی تعدیل‌کننده دارند. بخش بزرگی از مردم که علاقه‌ای به گفتمان‌های چپ و چپ افراطی ندارند، معمولاً جذب احزاب راست میانه می‌شوند. در دهه‌های اخیر طبقات متوسط و فرودست بیش از پیش به راست گرایش دارند. این احزاب در عین این که خواسته‌ها و آرزوهای پایگاه اجتماعی خود را نمایندگی می‌کنند، می‌توانند همزمان برخی از زیاد

Signed sadegh pourkiany

14 Mar 2023, 06:09 UTC138 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

🛑 «نمی‌ذارم سر من هم بذارن، کلاهی که سر بابام رفته! نه دیگه بهمن پنجاه و هفته نه دیگه حرف برق مُفت و پول نفته» #شاهرخ 🆔

👍2

Signed sadegh pourkiany

4 Mar 2023, 21:20 UTC114 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @farahdibapahlaviPhoto

فاجعه موحش مسمومیت‌های زنجیره ای در مدارس دخترانه که در هفته‌های اخیر به شهر‌های مختلف سرایت کرده است برای ما ایرانیان درد بزرگی است. رژیم ولایت فقیه گوشه های تازه ای از سرشت ناپاک خود را به جهانیان نشان میدهد، چهره ای که چهل و چهار سال پیش شاهنشاه فقید با بینش کامل آنرا«وحشت بزرگ» توصیف کرد. سوال این است که چرا دراین چند ماهه مقامات مسئول در این خصوص سکوت کرده ا‌ند و این پرده پوشی نشانه چیست؟ آیا نمی‌توان پذیرفت

🔥1

Signed sadegh pourkiany

3 Mar 2023, 03:59 UTC115 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @setademodiranPoll

بنظر شما مسمومیت سازمان یافته در مدارس و دانشگاهها بیشتر شبیه رفتار کدام دسته می‌باشد؟

  1. تندروهای حکومت جهت انتقام از دختران این کار را کرده اند43%
  2. اصلاح‌طلبان و مجاهدین خلق جهت برانگیختن خشم مردم این کار را کرده اند57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed sadegh pourkiany

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @enteqadie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Mar 2023, 03:59 UTCAnonymous Poll279 voters

بنظر شما مسمومیت سازمان یافته در مدارس و دانشگاهها بیشتر شبیه رفتار کدام دسته می‌باشد؟

  1. تندروهای حکومت جهت انتقام از دختران این کار را کرده اند43%
  2. اصلاح‌طلبان و مجاهدین خلق جهت برانگیختن خشم مردم این کار را کرده اند57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 January 2023 to 26 January 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“درباره همه چیز” (@enteqadie), 20 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enteqadie.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.