Channel
@enmoonizer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
44subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001575636110 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enmoonizer |
| Description | ㅤㅤㅤ এ MMII. thespianism savvys hocus-pocus though the whimsical quandaries of integer ‘wit an unambiguous lothario bloods causing our fate, a gloomy scenic’s presented our savvier bereft cumbrously: @enmoonizerbot. 📜 ㅤㅤㅤ |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 3 July 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enmoonizer |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 44 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 3 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 July 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 Juli 2022. Lahir sebuah karya yang patut kita apresiasi, salah satu idola pria Enhypen merilis lagu baru bertajuk 'Future Perfect (Pass The Mic)' Tak lupa dengan senang hati kami ucapkan selamat kepada para pengguna rupa pelantun yang disebut, yakni ; @Keranjay @HeeCastle @PETERP_EN @enmoonizer @forenshic @Hoonversee @PaguyJungwon
Happy comeback for ENHYPEN and ENHYPEN POTRAYERS, especially for NOLLPAT lovely mutuals @Paguyjungwon @TongHoon @Sundaycare @Ganjay @Keranjay @HoonRoll @Forenshic @Enmoonizer @Enwarts @EnhypenMajesty also another ENHYPEN POTRAYERS! ♡ Don't forget to stream and please give them a lot of love and full support to pay their struggles in making this masterpiece! 🥳
Happy comeback buat si ganteng ENHYPEN, lagunya keren 🥳🥳 Especially, Enhydom (us), @Forenshic, @ENKASEP, @HeeCastle, @HeeClus, @Jakesphere, @HoonRoll, @ENMOONIZER, @Hoonversee and @PETERP_EN😘💖
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
happy comeback! 🥰
https://youtu.be/QMlNLo74mOw
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
ㅤ 𝐀𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐚 𝐭𝐰𝐢𝐱𝐭 #𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭’𝐬 𝐦𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬 𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐛𝐢𝐮𝐦 𝐟𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐦. ━━━━━━━━━━━━┈┈ ♜ 𖥔 ִ ۫ ּ Rhapsody extensively liberation quell jubilation amplified melancholy woe o’er penumbra, void luminosity phosphorescence of gleam fetch magnitude tension etiquette mien midst terra–cosmos. Primaeval idiosyncrasy of quintessence sui generis windswept ‘…
ㅤ 🎙⬪˙ 𓈒 𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝟒𝐭𝐡, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐 ✧ bit.ly/FuturePerfectENHYPEN 𝐀𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐤 𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐧, 𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐥 𝐥𝐚𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐚 𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐞. 𝐕𝐞𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨’ #𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐚𝐱 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨’𝐞𝐫-𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐭. 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐨𝐰 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐞 𝐞𝐮𝐦𝐨𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐲𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧— ❛ 𝙼𝙰𝙽𝙸𝙵𝙴𝚂𝚃𝙾 : 𝙳𝙰𝚈 𝟷 ❜ ㅤ
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @enmoonizer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,157,706 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@enmoonizer named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ENMOONIZER.” (@enmoonizer), 44 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enmoonizer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.