Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Jake Community

@JakeCommunity

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001720719722
TypeChannel
Username@JakeCommunity
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 June 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/JakeCommunity

Growth

398 August 2026 — 39 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39 subscribers8 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38–40 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:1739no change
8 Aug 2026, 16:4639first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 June 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Videos
3
Links
5

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍266.7%
133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2022 to 27 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jul 2022, 15:27 UTC263 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @EnhypenProjectPhoto

ㅤ 🎙⬪˙ 𓈒 𝐉𝐮𝐥𝐲 𝟒𝐭𝐡, 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟐 ✧ bit.ly/FuturePerfectENHYPEN 𝐀𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐬 𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐭𝐡 𝐛𝐚𝐥𝐤 𝐩𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐫𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧 𝐪𝐮𝐢𝐜𝐤𝐞𝐧, 𝐝𝐨𝐥𝐭 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐨𝐥 𝐥𝐚𝐚𝐦𝐚𝐧𝐭𝐮𝐚 𝐯𝐢𝐥𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐱𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐞. 𝐕𝐞𝐡𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐨’ #𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐚𝐜𝐡𝐫𝐨𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐦𝐢𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐚𝐱 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨’𝐞𝐫-𝐫𝐚𝐮𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐭. 𝐒𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐭𝐨𝐰 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐞 𝐞𝐮𝐦𝐨𝐢𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐲𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐩𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧— ❛ 𝙼𝙰𝙽𝙸𝙵𝙴𝚂𝚃𝙾 : 𝙳𝙰𝚈 𝟷 ❜ ㅤ

3 Jul 2022, 15:27 UTC330 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @EnhypenProject

ㅤ 𝐀𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐚𝐯𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐜𝐢𝐫𝐜𝐚 𝐭𝐰𝐢𝐱𝐭 #𝐅𝐮𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭’𝐬 𝐦𝐲𝐫𝐢𝐚𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐞 𝐚𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐩𝐨𝐬 𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐝𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐛𝐢𝐮𝐦 𝐟𝐚𝐛𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐦. ━━━━━━━━━━━━┈┈ ♜ 𖥔 ִ ۫ ּ Rhapsody extensively liberation quell jubilation amplified melancholy woe o’er penumbra, void luminosity phosphorescence of gleam fetch magnitude tension etiquette mien midst terra–cosmos. Primaeval idiosyncrasy of quintessence sui generis windswept ‘

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JakeCommunity. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 901,859 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jake Community” (@JakeCommunity), 39 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JakeCommunity.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.