Channel
@emelianenko_leo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
18subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003885562002 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @emelianenko_leo |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 15 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/emelianenko_leo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:41 | 18 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 17 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:02 | 16 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 16 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
50 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 25 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 6.00% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 4.00% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 2.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 50 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ура, потихоньку индексируется в поисковиках sportal-courses.com , только пока с таким запросами как демобилизация это как и через сколько можно есть черешню после обеда Ещё из интересного, чтобы ChatGPT и другие популярные ИИ тебя могли рекомендовать – нужно индексироваться в Bing, его чаще всего используют для поиска в LLM
👍1😁1
Эволюция моего мнения о бизнесе: [Бизнес это круто] [Большой бизнес это круто] [Большой прибыльный бизнес это круто] [Прибыльный бизнес это круто] [Бизнес на свои деньги это круто] [Прибыльный бизнес на свои деньги это круто] [Масштабируемый прибыльный бизнес на свои деньги это круто] - сейчас😅
😁2🥰1
Иногда на мой лендинг с приложением люди попадают через chatgpt, я хочу чтобы это было по-чаще, это будущее наше, поисковики сосут
🔥3💯1
Чтобы развиваться не нужно делать БОЛЬШЕ, нужно делать действия которые являются ЭФФЕКТИВНЫМИ Простой пример на росте дохода в карьерной лестнице. Поначалу кажется, что чтобы росла ЗП нужно: 1. Много работать 2. Хорошо выполнять свои обязанности На самом деле нужно: 1. Иметь хорошие отношения с нужными людьми 2. Уметь красиво рассказывать о том что сделал и чего не делал Часто упираемся в то что для дальнейшего…
❤3
Я запустил новый проект – Sportal Courses. Это маркетплейс спортивных курсов, где вы сможете находить курсы для своего здоровья и результатов Любой пользователь может стать автором, создавать курсы и зарабатывать на них, трафик приведем сами. Подробнее тут На платформе сейчас можете пройти курс по тренировкам на улице. В курсе вы узнаете что нужно для занятий, какие упражнения можно делать, как составить программу …
❤2
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥3🥰1
Нужно будет ехать в Армению регать юр лицо, чтобы сделать платежку google billing Ещё и карту оформлю иностранную, а то моя заканчивается
🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
🤔1
Каждый вечер теперь вот такой перекус у меня
🤔2
Ура!!! Сводка по вложениям в канал: 1. На рекламу в других каналах потратил 20к руб. Это дало 500-600 подписчиков 2. Около 15к ушло на рекламу в Яндекс Директ 3. На контент аж потрачено 60к 4. На инфраструктуру бота, который давал трафик в канал около 5-10к Итого всего лишь вышло 100.000 руб😂😢😂
🔥2
Ребят, нужно 2 человека до 1000 подписчиков @sportalhub Как стукнет – сделаю пост про то, сколько я потратил на канал💸
🔥2
Скоро выпущу новый проект Каждый раз я сталикиваюсь с тем, что развитие функционала затягивает и непонятно когда остановиться Чем ближе к выпуску обновления или выпуску нового проекта – тем больше я урезаю функционал Например, фунционал достижений для пользователя крутая штука, повысит удержание, но это нафиг не нужно для запуска, пока первые пользователи будут набираться – я это реализую и выкачу
🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @emelianenko_leo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Емельяненко” (@emelianenko_leo), 18 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/emelianenko_leo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.