Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Elon Musk

@elonmusk_intel

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

26,560subscribers

+10,004 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002515912669
TypeChannel
Username@elonmusk_intel
DescriptionSenior Advisor to the President of the United States
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/elonmusk_intel

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

30,700 average views per post against 26,560 subscribers — an engagement rate of 115.5%. Across the 6,750 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,613 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 2.64% and 15.5%, with a median of 7.15%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (16 July 2026 15 August 2026)
Posts measured29 of 29 published in the window (1 exact, 28 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled889,529
Mature posts only123.8% over 27 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers26,560 measured 14 August 2026
Cohortb10000:eng · 6,750 channels · p10 0.737% · p25 2.64% · p50 7.15% · p75 15.5% · p90 27.8%
Position in cohort99.689th percentile · 16.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.109% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

16,55126,75621,653.57 August 2026 — 16,556 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,556 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,561 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,556 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,551 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,756 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,646 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,616 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,560 subscribers26,5607 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10,004. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,020–28,287 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 22:3326,560-56
13 Aug 2026, 15:3826,616-30
12 Aug 2026, 16:5726,646-110
11 Aug 2026, 13:4826,756+10,205
10 Aug 2026, 15:3416,551-5
9 Aug 2026, 16:3816,556-5
8 Aug 2026, 15:4516,561+5
7 Aug 2026, 16:0716,556no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:4616,556first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
115.5%
avg views ÷ 26,560 subscribers
Avg views / post
30,700
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held29 (26 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total889,529
Reactions total3,109
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
114
Videos
1,020
Links
1,170

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
50m 20s
Average length
2m 01s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,109 reactions across 29 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯67121.6%
👍61719.8%
55417.8%
🔥55017.7%
🤯2909.33%
👏2207.08%
😱772.48%
🙏752.41%
👀451.45%
🤩40.129%
30.096%
🤔30.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC99 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🚨🚨 HOLY FCKING SHT 🚨🚨 Will Cain just dropped a NUCLEAR BOMB on Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent… “You worked for GEORGE SOROS… What do we misunderstand about him?” Bessent’s response will DESTROY everything you thought you knew: “I only ran his INVESTMENT side… never the foundation. We barely talked politics. We haven’t spoken since right after Trump won in 2016.” Then the KILL SHOT: “Election night 2016 was one of t

🔥51🤯1

14 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,470 views120 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Disney Employee says she was forced to get the Covid vaccine or face termination She was against it but got it to save the career that she loved “Disney forced all of its employees to get vaccinated, fully vaccinated by September 30th, 2021, or you'd be fired. I was backed into a corner. I decided to get it. I was so mad that I had to do that to keep my job — I got it because I love my job, and I need my job. But I

👍50💯4217🔥6🤯5

13 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,560 views90 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Jeffrey Epstein survivor Juliette Bryant shares a chilling account of waking up naked and paralyzed in a laboratory at the s*x trafficker’s New Mexico estate. Speaking on Epstein’s obsession with cloning, DNA, and transhumanism, she recalls the eerie presence of scientists in the room. "They were doing something else—something they don’t want anyone to know about." "They did something to me, and I want to know wha

👍38👀19🤯16🔥107

12 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈23,100 views107 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Psycho Bill says over 1 BILLION people could die by 2027 due to water shortages! He has been buying up water aquifers for years. How come every time the TV has a potential worldwide disaster to cover Bill Gates always pops up ? He is like a harbinger of doom. Senate hearing soon? Join: @elonmusk✅️ 🚨BREAKING: JFK IS ALIVE AND POSTING RIGHT NOW He is personally posting inside this channel The final letters are being

👍45🔥31🤯22😱8👏1

11 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈23,300 views106 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🚨 HOLY CRAP! Dr. Fauci was COVERING UP data showing a miscarriage rate of OVER 80% in pregnant women who received mRNA COVID vaccines in their first trimester It was effectively an ABORTION SHOT. This is MURDER. Per documents released today by Rand Paul and Senator Ron Johnson, "the raw data revealed an 82% miscarriage rate in women vaccinated during the first trimester. This is consistent with the 81% miscarriage

🤯48👍28🔥1893

10 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈23,200 views98 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🚨Barack Obama was using USAID to pretend to send money to a country for “aid” and instead laundering it to the Cayman Islands He would then use that money to fund and train “Rent-a-Riots” for protests to overthrow governments Sound familiar? Mike Benz on Joe Rogan: “A scandal during the Obama USAID era. We were running a number of rogue USAID operations in Cuba at the time. — I'm simply showing the American people

👍41🔥28🤯1612👏1

9 Aug 2026, 21:34 UTC≈23,200 views110 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Here it is: CONFIRMED BEYOND THE SHADOW OF A DOUBT: Ilhan Omar is running a ballot fraud operation in the 5th District of Minnesota — 300 ballots at a time. “You can see my car is full. All these here are absentee ballots. Can't you see? Look at all these. My car is full.” Q: “Who is the one filling out the absentee ballots?” “People who work with Ilhan and other candidates, they work for them.” Join: @elonmusk

🔥63👍18🤯15💯95

9 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈76,000 views100 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🚨 EMBALMERS ARE PULLING THIS OUT OF DEAD BODIES — AND THEY SAY IT DIDN’T EXIST BEFORE THE PANDEMIC Look at this jar. White, rubbery, fibrous structures — some half an inch long — clogging veins and arteries like alien spaghetti. Not normal blood clots. Not post-mortem artifacts. Experienced embalmers with decades under their belts are staring at the camera saying the exact same thing: “We’ve never seen anything lik

🤯53🔥22💯167👀2

8 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈76,000 views143 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🚨SIT DOWN AND LISTEN TO THIS VERY CAREFULLY THE reason why Anthony Fauci received a presidential pardon from Joe Biden starting from 2014 is that it's at that moment Fauci began funding the Wuhan laboratory It’s the biggest ADMISSION OF GUILT in the history of humanity. They had planned the entire plandemic but got caught red-handed so they covered their backs. It’s an absolute scandal that our media aren’t coveri

💯73👍4310🤯10🔥7

7 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈75,600 views169 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🚨The ‘Covid Pandemic’ was PLANNED by Bill Gates, Jeffrey Epstein, Dr. Fauci and the Rothschilds Family. WE HAVE THEIR EMAILS THESE ARE WAR CRIMES THEY MUST BE ARRESTED Join: @elonmusk✅️ 🚨BREAKING: JFK IS ALIVE AND POSTING RIGHT NOW He is personally posting inside this channel The final letters are being released through this channel only https://t.me/The17thLetter✳️ https://t.me/The17thLetter✳️

💯129👍20👏10😱6🤯4

6 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC≈76,300 views161 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

🚨Rep. Andy Ogles DEMANDS John Thune STEP DOWN Over SAVE America Act And Be REPLACED With Mike Lee: ‘Do Your Job Or RESIGN!’ "He has a mandate from the American people." "There are no excuses. There are no places to hide—Do your dadgum job or get out of the way." "There's no reason or excuse for him to be a coward. If he's not willing to do it, he needs to step out of the way and let Mike Lee or someone like Mike L

💯9539👍16👏10🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈76,200 views124 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

A forensic audit proved that an anonymous user remotely logged onto the Antrim, County EMS with escalated privileges and made changes to the election database in the Michigan 2020 Election, destroying any argument about internet and remote access to U.S. elections. Everything we were gaslit and lied to about for years when it comes to the 2020 Election that the media tried to cover up turned out to be true. Join: @

54🔥48😱11🤯6🙏5

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @elonmusk_intel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 933,298 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Elon Musk” (@elonmusk_intel), 26,560 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elonmusk_intel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.