🔁 REPOST Michael Saylor ✔️ · @saylor RT @TNorth: True North Episode 76: Why Strategy's Balance Sheet Became a Blackhole x.com/i/broadcasts/1… ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking

Channel
Elon · Vitalik · CZ · Saylor — Crypto Twitter Alerts
@ElonVitalikCZAlerts
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
4subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003874436899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ElonVitalikCZAlerts |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ElonVitalikCZAlerts |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:02 | 4 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 5 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 6 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
📣 POST Binance · @binance Gen Z keeps leverage low. Most Gen Z accounts avoid leveraged/inverse products—88.2% in TradFi‑Perps and 98.9% in bStocks. And when used, leverage is the smallest share of their volume ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
🔁 REPOST Michael Saylor ✔️ · @saylor RT @CoinMarketCap: LATEST: 📊 Michael Saylor unveiled a public BTC Credit dashboard that color-codes Strategy's debt by tier and shows at what Bitcoin price each instrument becomes undercollateralized. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
🔁 REPOST Michael Saylor ✔️ · @saylor RT @coinjoined: Suitcoiners 1:0 Shitcoiners 🎥 Watch video ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
🔁 REPOST Michael Saylor ✔️ · @saylor RT @Strategy: Even at a hypothetical $21k $BTC price, every Strategy debt and preferred instrument remains above a 1.0x BTC Rating. Explore the new BTC Floor metric: strategy.com/credit ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
📣 POST Michael Saylor ✔️ · @saylor Bitcoin is for everyone. 🎥 Watch video ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
↩️ REPLY Elon Musk ✔️ · @elonmusk ↩️ Replying to @chytofayel009: @billlee Back at the frontier. They’re keeping up 4.7 might surpass all ↩️ @elonmusk replied: @chytofayel009 @billlee 🚀🌓 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
🔁 REPOST Elon Musk ✔️ · @elonmusk RT @billlee: one step closer to moon cannon and party. 🎥 Watch video ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
🔁 REPOST Elon Musk ✔️ · @elonmusk RT @JasonBud: give 4.6 a try and let us know how it goes. your feedback is a big part of why the model gets better with each iteration. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
↩️ REPLY Elon Musk ✔️ · @elonmusk ↩️ Replying to @njmarko: @elonmusk @beffjezos great model. can you drop a usage reset as well? 🙏 spent all usage before grok 4.6 dropped on making a movie scene in grok imagine 2.0 x.com/njmarko/status… ↩️ @elonmusk replied: @njmarko @beffjezos Ok ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
↩️ REPLY Elon Musk ✔️ · @elonmusk ↩️ Replying to @cognition: Grok 4.6 is now available in Devin. Grok 4.6 marks a significant improvement over Grok 4.5, surpassing GPT-5.6 Sol, behind only Opus 5 and Fable 5. ↩️ @elonmusk replied: @cognition Grok 4.7 will exceed all current models. That said, Anthropic is a great company and will probably release improved models soon. However, the SpaceX training corpus is so …
🟢 FOLLOW Elon Musk · @elonmusk ↳ Cognition 🏢 · @cognition Makers of Devin, the first AI software engineer. We are an applied AI lab building end-to-end software agents. Join us: https://t.co/4Ss9hvpjRG 👥 171,214 · 🔄 6 · 🐦 877 · 📅 Jan 2024 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🦅 Start Tracking
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ElonVitalikCZAlerts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ElonVitalikCZAlerts named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Elon · Vitalik · CZ · Saylor — Crypto Twitter Alerts” (@ElonVitalikCZAlerts), 4 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ElonVitalikCZAlerts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.