Channel
@elinazhgutova
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
370subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002022232490 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elinazhgutova |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elinazhgutova |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 370 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 369 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 372 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 372 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
36 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 38.9% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 11.1% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 5.56% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Когда уже почти что не осталось Ни силы, ни надежды. И пути Не видно даже. Только лишь усталость Тебя гнетёт и не даёт идти. Когда в сухом остатке, только беды И одиночество, и холод прошлых лет, И оказались мнимыми победы, И все усилья сведены на нет. Взгляни на эти солнечные блики, На этих сосен жёлтые стволы, Узор ветвей немой и многоликий, На птах, что так невинны и милы. Остановись, взгляни на это небо, На э…
❤7
Posted without readable text
❤5
Та самая сцена в сериале "Когда растаял снег", где избежавшие наказания нацистские преступники жируют в Аргентине, а фашист презентует книгу, в которой описывает роман с сотрудницей внешней разведки СССР. Там же, на высоком рауте с шампанским ему подают идею издать книгу в России: "Русские женщины видели в нас только врагов, несущих им боль и слезы, а, прочитав Вашу книгу они поймут, что немецкий мужчина тоже может …
😡3😢2
Каюсь ( если можно каяться, что не смотришь телевизор) пропустила в 2009 году сериал "Когда растаял снег". Но, похоже так сделала вся страна, а, главное, правоохранительные органы. С моей точки зрения, этот сериал, если не открытая реабилитация фашизма на федеральном канале "Россия", то уж точно идеологическая диверсия. Кроме того, что сценарий слеплен из дерьма и палок и больше похож на сказку, он откровенно заста…
❤1😡1
«Цель глобалистов — сократить наше население»: Элина Жгутова Все мы сегодня должны бороться за существование. И семья позволяет это делать более эффективно. Почему? Потому что мы знаем о целях глобалистов сократить наше население. Все способы хороши, что называется: девиантные ориентации, аборты, суррогатное материнство. Единственный заслон, который мы можем выставить — это свои традиционные ценности, как бы баналь…
💯3👏2🤣1
На Спасе обсудили внедрение в образование медиков предмета "Биоэтика"
👏2
Сегодня день семьи. А уже завтра состоится заседание суда по делу о семейной истории, за которой следят миллионы россиян. Завтра в Новгородском областном суде будет рассматриваться апелляционная жалоба Ольги Адамович о незаконности передачи её правнучки Ники под опеку в семью местных чиновников - главы района Максима Тимофеева, курирующего работу органов опеки в районе, и его супруги, Надежды Тимофеевой, занимающей …
💯3
Дети офлайн. Почему Запад закрывает соцсети для подростков? Вечер на СПАСЕ. Ток-шоу 📌 Все больше стран вводят законодательные ограничения на использование социальных сетей детьми и подростками. 📌 Австралия первая в прошлом году закрыла для несовершеннолетних доступ к таким платформам. Закон обязал представителей веб-ресурсов проверять возраст пользователей, нарушителям грозит большой денежный штраф. 📌 Вслед за Ав…
Вчера на "Спасе" обсуждали запрет соцсетей для детей. Я предложила подумать над вопросом "закреплено ли право пользования соц.сетями в Конституции, чтобы государство обсуждало это с гражданами?" На мой взгляд - нет. Соответственно, и без многочисленных шоу государство может делать свою работу по оздоровлению информационного пространства, в частности, интернета, без привлечения внимания пациентов.
💯3👎2
Работает переправа Захарково (Тушино) - Северный речной вокзал. Раз в час ходит "Москва", 10 минут в пути, 80 рублей
❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @elinazhgutova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Элина Жгутова” (@elinazhgutova), 370 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elinazhgutova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.