Channel
@elenakodydalyonki
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
4,431subscribers
+3,734 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004355322170 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @elenakodydalyonki |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 14 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/elenakodydalyonki |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 4,431 | +167 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:38 | 4,264 | -86 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 4,350 | -49 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 4,399 | -51 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:26 | 4,450 | +1,030 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 3,420 | +2,202 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 1,218 | +325 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 893 | +196 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 697 | no change |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 697 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
203 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 73 | 36.0% | |
| ❤ | 68 | 33.5% | |
| 👍 | 31 | 15.3% | |
| 🥰 | 23 | 11.3% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 2.46% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.985% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.493% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Я ХОЧУ СВОИ ДЕНЬГИ , но у меня маленький ребенок, нет опыта и я боюсь ошибиться” — разбор самой частой ситуации, с которой приходят мамы в декрете. Это, наверное, одна из самых частых историй, которые я вижу. Женщина в декрете думает о заработке не потому, что ей “скучно дома”. А потому что внутри уже назрело: ➕хочется свои деньги, ➕хочется не зависеть полностью от мужа, ➕хочется снова почувствовать себя не только…
🔥15❤14👍14
Sticker, posted without a caption
КАК МАМЕ В ДЕКРЕТЕ ВЫБРАТЬ ОНЛАЙН-ПРОФЕССИЮ И НЕ ПОТЕРЯТЬСЯ В СОТНЕ ВАРИАНТОВ Когда женщина в декрете начинает задумываться о заработке, чаще всего она попадает в настоящий шум. С одной стороны — огромное желание начать зарабатывать свои деньги. С другой — море информации: ✔️идти в SMM, ✔️осваивать нейросети, ✔️учиться на менеджера маркетплейсов, ✔️делать инфографику, ✔️идти в продажи, ✔️работать куратором, ✔️осв…
🔥14👍13❤12💘2💯1
Я расскажу подробнее про школу, про направления и помогу сориентироваться, с чего лучше начать именно в твоей ситуации.
🔥4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥14
Sticker, posted without a caption
Записала для вас аудио на очень важную тему. Особенно для тех, кто давно думает о заработке, смотрит в сторону обучения, но все время останавливается. Внутри аудио я разбираю: — почему желание зарабатывать часто так и остается желанием — что мешает женщине в декрете решиться на обучение и пойти в новый этап — почему самой очень сложно не запутаться в выборе — что помогает не просто купить курс, а действительно …
🥰5🔥4👏3
Иногда женщине в декрете нужны не советы “будь смелее”, а нормальная опора‼️ Очень многие мамы в декрете хотят не просто заработать. Они хотят снова почувствовать себя отдельной личностью. Не только мамой. Не только тем человеком, который всем нужен. А женщиной, которая тоже может хотеть, выбирать, развиваться и иметь свои деньги. Но здесь есть ловушка. Когда женщина начинает искать варианты заработка, на нее с…
🥰10
Спасибо вам за честность.🫶♥️ Это очень важный момент: увидеть, что вы не “одна такая”. Чаще всего дело не в лени и не в отсутствии способностей, а в страхе выбрать не то, потерять деньги, не справиться и снова разочароваться. Именно поэтому сегодня хочу поговорить с вами не про “успешный успех”, а про реальный путь женщины в декрете к своим деньгам.
🔥6
Что сейчас ближе всего вам?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥8❤6
Давайте честно, без красивых ответов.
🥰3🔥2
‼️Когда очень хочется свои деньги, но кажется, что в декрете для этого просто нет ни времени, ни сил, ни понятного пути… Многие мамы в декрете живут в очень похожем состоянии. С одной стороны — огромное желание начать зарабатывать. Хотя бы на свои расходы. Хотя бы почувствовать, что ты тоже можешь. Хотя бы перестать внутри зависеть от того, даст кто-то деньги или нет. А с другой стороны — реальная жизнь: -ребе…
❤21🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @elenakodydalyonki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что сейчас ближе всего вам?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена•ФРИЛАНС БЕЗ ШУМА” (@elenakodydalyonki), 4,431 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/elenakodydalyonki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.