4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 242–244 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 02:37
244
+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:46
243
no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:03
243
+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:00
242
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
75.4%
avg views ÷ 244 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held
12 (9 June 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total
736
Reactions total
66
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
289 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
147
50.9%
🙏
35
12.1%
🔥
29
10.0%
💔
27
9.34%
💯
17
5.88%
👍
15
5.19%
😭
11
3.81%
⚡
4
1.38%
🍓
3
1.04%
🙈
1
0.346%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
модно читаю литературную газету Билли (на фото №2), талантливо, надо сказать, исполненную (оценка тру газетчика).
это до того, как выяснилось, что в мое отсутствие коллеги пришли к выводу, что я «конечно же» москвичка. после этого уже пошла объяснять им, что у нас в саратове делают за такой базар.
глянец fashion paper запускает журнал вместо газеты. конечно же они отказываются от иллюстрированных обложек… ааа ого вот это да кажется у леруси была об этом КОЛОНКА
все лишь бы не платить деньги талантливым художникам 🫰🏼🙏🏼
читаю!
роман о попытке людей бежать из славного города Марселя от беспощадных рук немцев в 41м году. книжку я случайно увидела в Озере и удивилась изданию: дело в том, что серия эксклюзивной классики, хорошо вам знакомая, обычно включает скучные типичные вещи. увидеть неизвестную фамилию было любопытно. когда начала читать, обнаружила пост в Кенотафе с упоминанием Зегерс в качестве «забытого советского лица» и удиви…
это оно! это мы, это я вон там на втором фото — пытаюсь не запутаться в скандинавских авторах перед расстановкой их на полки.
официально откроемся уже через часик. поэтому приходите смотреть на гениальный магазик. однажды блин и я такой открою!!!! 💐
июньский дампик на пороге моего нового летнего этапа в роли книжного червячка. и веселости, и жизнь, и музыка, и все, что можно потрогать, а главное — почувствовать!
папа сел смотреть футбол слава богу для этого дела дома осталось около сотки тиража моей газеты. должно на весь чм хватить по идее
берите на заметку — где-то в фаланстере, кажется, все еще можно взять последний выпуск..
Алейникову находка моя не понравилась, как не нравился, по видимому, и сам Лимонов. не говорите ему, что показала вам. это по секрету
❤19🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @electrosalvador. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“цветорычание льва” (@electrosalvador), 244 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/electrosalvador.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.