Channel
@ejykarpat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
112subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001654144373 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ejykarpat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ejykarpat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 112 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 106 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 106 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (31 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,651 |
| Reactions total | 64 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
64 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 38 | 59.4% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 23.4% | |
| 🥴 | 3 | 4.69% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 3.13% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 1.56% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.56% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 64reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#общество К сожалению, вновь вынужден вернуться к теме этого американского протестанта. Очень опасное и вредное мнение, будто бы в России нужны вообще все христиане без разбору (ну, может быть, восточные - куда ни шло), но вот принимать вообще всех католиков и уж тем более - протестантов - дело опасное. Предупреждения того же Холмогорова в этом плане, конечно, оправданы. Поэтому надо укреплять положение православия…
👍1👏1
Как говорится, "чего бы такого написать, чтобы всех корёжило". Безусловно, имеющиеся европейские традиционалисты крайне малочисленны, у них нет ни единого шанса взять власть в руки. Их единственная доступная деятельность сейчас - распространять своё горизонтальное влияние всеми возможными способами. Даже если предположить, что в случае какой-либо войны "Востока и Запада", после которой будет проведено переучреждение…
👍2
#размышления Возможен ли какой-то "умеренный" вариант консерватизма в современной Европе? В теории - да, но положение (в том числе и идейное) имеющихся ныне таковых групп очень нестабильно. Польша, Германия, Франция ну и возможно в каких-то ещё странах таковые партии и объединения имеют слабую поддержку и уже в основном содействуют с мейнстримными крупными партиями (хотя стоит признать, что это единственный путь так…
👍2
#прочее Нет, голосовать за новолюдов я не буду. Даже если соответствующим брелоком обладаю. Хацунэ Мику выбирает внепартийность.
😁4
#новости А ведь сегодняшняя история с этим американским фермером как раз про то, о чём я недавно поднимал разговор. Быстро, однако, хоть тут и не про буров. Поэтому, безусловно, хоть всяким консервативным европеоидам нам сюда и дан зелёный свет, но необходимо, однако, установить контроль за их пребыванием у нас. Не денно и нощный, конечно, а так, следить за их юридическим статусом. Действительно ли занимаются "вани…
👍3
#прочее Потреот. P.S. Никогда не позволяю себе оскорбительно писать про различные явления России, даже если они мне до глубины души омерзительны.
🥴3❤1👍1
#прочее Проклятые большевики переместились в середину XIX века и настрочили донос на Юрия Фёдоровича Самарина за его Рижские записки. А если серьёзно, то доносительство не привязано к конкретной эпохе и идеологии. Это просто одна из худших человеческих черт характера.
👍4
#мем Чувак, это Борис на фото... Отношение Антоновского к корректным фотографиям теперь будет мемом.
😁4☃1👍1
#мем Вспомнил кое-что) Вам лучше не знать, в каком контексте я это написал) P.S. Я снова натыкал огромное полотно из букв, не заметив того!
😁3
#общество Вообще, кстати, интересно было бы узнать, а почему они решили избрать столь недальновидный путь. Как будто бы специально издевались таким образом над самими собой. Хотя казалось бы, люди, вроде, неглупые (во всяком случае, Крылов). У этого может быть несколько версий. Либо в силу особенностей возрождения публичной политики и вообще общественного движения они просто не смогли выдумать что-то лучше. Либо они…
👍1🤔1
#общество Вообще, с этой точки зрения, я бы сказал бы, что это не столько "легитимизация русского национализма", сколько просто возвращение к норме. Историческая русскоцентричность (в союзе с другими коренными малыми народами) нашей страны это не то же самое, что и национализм в его современном понимании и в этом плане, приведённый Минченко пример с этнической ситуацией на Урале показателен.
👍2
#прочее Старые читатели заметили, а новым, думаю, будет полезно узнать, а как так вышло, что я сейчас не особо часто упоминаю антикоммунизм да и вообще не заостряю на этом внимание и, по большому счёту, не вижу в нём большого смысла. Моя основная причина, по которой я отошёл от всего этого - банальная усталость от всего этого антикоммунизма и бесполезной борьбы с леваками, которые забороли сами себя. Уж поверьте мн…
👍3👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ejykarpat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 121,249 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пан Йиржи из Карпат” (@ejykarpat), 112 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ejykarpat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.