2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 05:46
59
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:36
59
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.1%
avg views ÷ 59 subscribers
Avg views / post
16.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
12.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held
20 (5 March 2025 – 16 July 2026)
Views total
16
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
11
Videos
1
Links
33
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
102 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
31
30.4%
👍
19
18.6%
🔥
18
17.6%
🙏
14
13.7%
😁
8
7.84%
👏
4
3.92%
🤩
3
2.94%
🥰
2
1.96%
🥴
2
1.96%
😍
1
0.98%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📌 خودپوشانی؛ سمِ مهلکِ مخفی
گاهی فکر میکنم یکی از عمیقترین زخمهایی که سالهاست بر روان ما نشسته، عادت به خودپوشانی است. اینکه هر روز بخشی از خودم را پنهان کنم و بخشی را کمرنگ. هیچ حس خوبی ندارم وقتی ناچارم تظاهر کنم، حتی اگر بدانم راه دیگری پیش پایم نیست.
مدتهاست به این میاندیشم که ما ایرانیها از کِی اینقدر به دورویی عادت کردهایم.
نه، منظورم دورویی به معنای اخلاقیاش نیست. منظورم همان چیزی است که جامعهشن…
📌 کلاسهای هوش مصنوعی و برنامهنویسی برای کودک و نوجوان
وقتشه تماشاگر بودن رو کنار بذاریم.
به جای ساعتها گشتن توی گوشی و تبلت، فرزندتون میتونه وارد دنیایی بشه که خودش سازنده و خالق باشه. این یعنی اعتمادبهنفس، خلاقیت و آمادگی برای دنیای فردا. 💫
این روزا که تکنولوژی با سرعت نور جلو میره و هوش مصنوعی خیلی از کارای تکراری رو انجام میده، دیگه فقط مصرفکننده بودن کافی نیست. باید یاد بگیریم خالق باشیم!
🌱 میدونیم دغ…
📌 اتکا به گفتار چهها از ما گرفت
اکبر سردوزامی نوشته بود:
«گاهی فکر میکنم این ادبیاتچیها راست میگویند که نوشتن کشف کردن است. اما اشکال در این است که من هرچی به کشفهای خودم و دیگران نگاه میکنم، میبینم قدیمی است.
هرچه از ایرانی میخوانم میبینم حرفهای قدیمی است.
هرچه از ایرانی مینویسم میبینم حرفهای قدیمی است.
یعنی هی همان چیزهای گذشته را از نو کشف میکنیم.»
گفتهی سردوزامی را حمید یگانه در کتاب «فرهنگ گفت…
سلام سلام😊
همراهان خوبم
بعضی از شما عزیزان پیگیر وبینارها هستید، خواستم اطلاع بدم که باتوجه به نتیجه نظرسنجی و شرایط خودم تصمیم بر این شد که محتواها رو از این پس در قالب ویدیوهای ضبطشده داشته باشیم. ولی من از طریق سایت و همین کانال در ارتباط مستقیم با شما هستم و هر سوالیبودپاسخگو خواهم بود.
👈در ضمن در ویس ابتدای «ماهنامه پروچیستا» دربارهی این موضوع صحبت کردم.
توی این کانال ویدیوها و محتواها بهطور اختصاصی اشترا…
🌱شماره سوم ماهنامه پروچیستا منتشر شد!
تو این شماره هم مثل همیشه، مطالب متنوع، خوندنی و الهامبخش منتظرته.
از این لینک میتونی بخونی، بشنوی و ببینیش! ✨
ماهنامهی چندرسانهای پروچیستا
💫 پروچیستا | ناعمه سجادی
🆔 @procheasta
📌 ویدیوی وبینار مدرسمحتواگر - جلسه دوازدهم - ۱۹ فروردین ۱۴۰۴
🎯 عملگرایی در ۱۴۰۴ برای مدرسمحتواگران
در این جلسه از مجموعه وبینارهای مدرسمحتواگر، درباره یکی از مهمترین نیازهای حرفهای ما در سال جدید صحبت کردیم:
چطور با ذهنیت عملگرا، ایدههای خود را به اجرا برسانیم و از چرخهی برنامهریزیهای بیپایان رها شویم؟
📢 اگر میخواهی سال ۱۴۰۴ را با اقدامهای واقعی و هدفمند پیش ببری، این جلسه را از دست نده!
🔗 عضویت در …
📌 اولین جلسه از وبینار مدرسمحتواگر در سال جدید
موضوع:
عملگرایی در ۱۴۰۴ برای مدرسمحتواگران
حضور برای همه آزاد و رایگان است.
زمان وبینار:
سهشنبه ۱۹ فروردین- ساعت ۱۸
لینک شرکت در وبینار:
https://www.skyroom.online/ch/madresenevisandegi/naemehsajadi
💫 پروچیستا | ناعمه سجادی
🆔 @procheasta
❌یه همفکری
راستش این مدت فکر کردم شاید بهتر باشه به جای وبینارهای هفتگی، به صورت منظم براتون یه سری ویدیوهای ۱۵-۲۰ دقیقهای ضبط کنم تا هر زمانی از روز که وقت داشتین ببینینشون. میخواستم بدونم نظر شما در این رابطه چیه؟
من وبینار آتلاین رو ترجیح میدم. اینجوری ارتباط بهتری با مدرس دارم.25%
من ویدیوی ضبطشده رو بیشتر دوست دارم. اینجوری هر زمانی دلم بخواد محتوا رو میبینم.75%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @educatorcreators. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
❌یه همفکری
راستش این مدت فکر کردم شاید بهتر باشه به جای وبینارهای هفتگی، به صورت منظم براتون یه سری ویدیوهای ۱۵-۲۰ دقیقهای ضبط کنم تا هر زمانی از روز که وقت داشتین ببینینشون. میخواستم بدونم نظر شما در این رابطه چیه؟
من وبینار آتلاین رو ترجیح میدم. اینجوری ارتباط بهتری با مدرس دارم.25%
من ویدیوی ضبطشده رو بیشتر دوست دارم. اینجوری هر زمانی دلم بخواد محتوا رو میبینم.75%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2025 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مدرسمحتواگر” (@educatorcreators), 59 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/educatorcreators.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
