Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Easy Fuzzing: просто о сложном

@easy_fuzzing

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

293subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001338744829
TypeChannel
Username@easy_fuzzing
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/easy_fuzzing

Growth

2936 Aug 2026, 22:47 — 293 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 21:02 — 293 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 22:477 Aug 2026, 21:02
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 292–294 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 21:02293no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:47293first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 August 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

134 reactions across 16 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3929.1%
3223.9%
custom 53980644183092998181712.7%
❤‍🔥75.22%
👍75.22%
🌭64.48%
🍾64.48%
🤡64.48%
custom 539568139006485338732.24%
🎃32.24%
21.49%
😁21.49%
custom 539808966842203266110.746%
👻10.746%
😱10.746%
🤓10.746%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 134reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2023 to 31 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @easy_fuzzing. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 August 2023 to 31 December 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2025, 10:22 UTC248 views4 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

С Наступающими! Желаю вам без крешей в проде, а только в запланированной и тестируемой фаззингом (и не только) среде.

custom 53980644183092998184

8 Dec 2025, 07:37 UTC≈5,170 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Сергей в своём канале Протестировал поделился важной новостью и поднял важную тему про свой инструмент luzer. Для тех, кто не в курсе, luzer - это инструмент для тестирования Lua-кода методом фаззинга с анализом покрытия. Про него есть отличные материалы: - Доклад «Добавляем поддержку скриптового языка в AFL и LibFuzzer на примере Lua» с конференции Heisenbug - Доклад «Фаззинг как основа эффективной разработки на п

7🤡2

3 Dec 2025, 13:37 UTC380 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

…дарно! Уже прошла неделя, как отгремел ZeroNights 2025, и это было действительно легендарное возвращение. Был очень рад увидеть «старых» друзей после долгого перерыва и обрести новые знакомства. Организаторы сказали, что видео и слайды опубликуют позже, так что подборка по тематике канала откладывается. Были моменты когда интересные доклады были сразу на всех трёх треках. А пока готовим материалы к ZeroNights 2026

🔥42

17 Oct 2025, 14:01 UTC443 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zeronightsPhoto

Осталось всего 3️⃣ часа до старта нашего традиционного хакерского квеста HackQuest! 🟢HackQuest будет длиться неделю — до 20:00 (МСК) часов 24 октября 🟢Каждый день в 20:00 (МСК) будет открываться новое задание, на решение которого отводится 24 часа 🟢Лучшие игроки получат инвайт на конференцию ZeroNights 2025! Правила участия подробно по ссылке. 🟩 Принять участие в HackQuest: hackquest.zeronights.org 🟩

🔥1

23 Sept 2025, 07:37 UTC548 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔥🔥 ZeroNights возвращается! И наш Фазя на лого как нельзя кстати подходит для этой новости. С этой конференцией у меня связано много тёплых воспоминаний, особенно со времён активного участия в организации. А теперь к сути – важное по ZN 2025: - До конца приёма заявок меньше трёх недель. Не тяните пожалуйста до последней секунды 12 октября (да-да, я знаю, вы всё равно пришлёте в 23:59 😉). В этом году два трека: Off

5custom 53956813900648533873🔥21🤡1

15 Sept 2025, 07:37 UTC≈1,960 views12 reactions3 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Существует такой замечательный проект, который "относительно" недавно получил реинкарнацию под цифрой 2 - Open Security Training. Для тех, кто не знает, это ресурс с курсами по Кибербезопасности, покрывающий довольно нишевые, а часть так и называют - низкого уровня, области. К примеру, безопасная загрузка, отладчики ядра, архитектуры вроде risc-v и .т.п. На сайте опубликованы схемы в каком порядке стоит обучаться то

7❤‍🔥4🤓1

31 Dec 2024, 11:16 UTC778 views11 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

С Наступающими! В уходящем году посты стали появляться конечно «чаще», но не так, как хотелось бы, а ведь в сфере фаззинг-тестирования происходит много интересного и полезного. Поэтому отличный повод дать обещание исправиться и писать чаще. К тому же черновики ждут! 😏

custom 53980644183092998189🍾1custom 53980896684220326611

13 Dec 2024, 12:14 UTC724 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Думал подождать Нового года, но раз тут достигли красивой IT-цифры — первых 256 подписчиков (за что всем огромнейшее Спасибо!), то решил, что самое время. Да и есть те, кто нарядил ёлочку, украсил аватарки и логотипы проектов и прочее уже 1-го декабря. Зайчик из AFL мне, конечно, импонирует, а уж сколько находок во время тестирования помог найти — и не счесть, но хотелось что-то своё. В общем, взял нафаззеную мешани

🍾54custom 53980644183092998184🔥2🤡2🎃1

10 Dec 2024, 12:36 UTC≈4,380 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ребята из Cyber Media "поймали" после очередного митапа и позадавали разные вопросы про фаззинг-тестирование: от что это вообще такое до как попробовать — https://t.me/secmedia/2338 или ссылка сразу на интервью. Enjoy!

6🔥51🤡1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @easy_fuzzing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Easy Fuzzing: просто о сложном” (@easy_fuzzing), 293 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/easy_fuzzing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.