Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مُسْكَة | جهاد الخُزاعي

@eaqalil

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,180subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956969166
TypeChannel
Username@eaqalil
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eaqalil

Growth

2,1702,1802,1757 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,170 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,180 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 3 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,169–2,182 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 19:162,180+10
7 Aug 2026, 17:182,170no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:062,170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2026 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

25 Mar 2026, 11:42 UTCviews —

مُسْكَة | جهاد الخُزاعي pinned «Bad news. Due to alleged view manipulation, restrictions were imposed on the channel, and the Telegram administration has warned that the channel may be deleted. The decision has been made to recreate the channel, and to avoid similar mistakes in the future…»

25 Mar 2026, 11:42 UTC≈1,770 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Bad news. Due to alleged view manipulation, restrictions were imposed on the channel, and the Telegram administration has warned that the channel may be deleted. The decision has been made to recreate the channel, and to avoid similar mistakes in the future, the invitation link will now be issued through the bot; the old channel will no longer be updated. Sorry for the inconvenience.

👍3

25 Mar 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,490 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @IFALajmi

«لم آخذ علم الفلسفة عن معلم». عز الدولة ابن كمونة تـ683هـ/1284م قلت: لعل فيه ما يحرك همم كثير من الدارسين للعلوم اليوم ولا يجدون معلمًا، فهم إذا نظروا إلى حالهم وجدوه أحسن من حال ابن كمونة؛ لوجود ما يقوم مقام المعلم عندهم مما هو مسموع أو مرئي أو غير ذلك، وهو لا يجد بعض هذا، ومع ذلك فهو مما اشتهر اسمه في الحكمة وذاع صيته وله ما انفرد به من الأبحاث والتحقيقات كما لا يخفى على مطالع. ويشبهه في ذلك هبة الله أبو البركات

24 Mar 2026, 06:50 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 7 August 2026

غايتي أن أفهم أرسطو، فكيف السبيل؟ . ليس المقصود من قراءة أرسطو أن تكون الغاية القصوى فهم الرجل لذاته، أو استيعاب ألفاظه ومذاهبه على جهة الحفظ والتقليد، فإنَّ هذا، وإن أفاد معرفةً بتاريخ الفكر، فليس هو المقصد الأعلى لطالب المنطق، وإنما ينبغي أن يكون النَّظر في كتب أرسطو وسائر ما يتصل بها وسيلةً إلى تحصيل الملكة البرهانية، أعني القدرة على إحكام التصورات، وتقويم الحدود والرسوم، وحسن ترتيب المقدمات، واستعمال القياس البره

22 Mar 2026, 04:50 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @PosteriorAnalytics

" قلت لأبي سليمان: إنّي أجد بين المنطق والنحو مناسبةً غالبة ومشابهةً قريبة، وعلى ذلك، فما الفرق بينهما؟ وهل يتعاونان بالمناسبة؟ وهل يتفاوتان بالقرب به؟ فقال: النحو منطقٌ عربي، والمنطق نحوٌ عقلي، وجلّ نظر المنطقي في المعاني، وإن كان لا يجوز له الإخلال بالألفاظ التي هي لها كالحلل والمعارض، وجلّ نظر النحوي في الألفاظ، وإن كان لا يسوغ له الإخلال بالمعاني التي هي لها كالحقائق والجواهر. ... وبالجملة، النحو يرتّب اللفظ تر

21 Mar 2026, 01:10 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 7 August 2026

ما المقصود بأن عقد الوضع مركب تقييدي وعقد الحمل مركب خبري؟ . مفهوم القضية نستطيع أن نقول -تسامحًا- إنَّه يرجع إلى جهتين: جهةٍ يؤخذ فيها الشيء تحت عنوان الموضوع، وجهةٍ يحكم فيها عليه بالمحمول، فقولهم: عقد الوضع مركب تقييدي، يعني أنَّ هذه الجهة ليست خبرًا تامًّا، بل قيدٌ يعرّف لنا الذات المقصودة، وقولهم: عقد الحمل مركب خبري، يعني أنَّ هذه الجهة هي موضع الحكم الذي به تصير العبارة قضيةً تقبل الصدق والكذب. revospring.net

19 Mar 2026, 16:39 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 7 August 2026

تقبل الله طاعتكم، وكل عام وأنتم بخير. عيد فطر مبارك، أعاده الله علينا وعليكم باليمن والبركات والمسرات.

12 Mar 2026, 22:43 UTC≈1,720 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

هل قرأ أحد الإخوة الكرام هذه الترجمة؟

11 Mar 2026, 20:15 UTC≈2,640 viewsread 7 August 2026

من المقالة الثالثة* لا الثانية.

11 Mar 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EmberThought

في سبب التّقعيد المنطقيّ بالأحرف قال ابن طملوس: "وأرسطوطاليس أخذ مكان الحد الأكبر، وهو الأول أ، ومكان الأوسط ب، ومكان الأخير وهو الأصغر، جـ، لتكون هذه الحروف مثالات للحدود التي كانت تستعمل أسماء في مواد طلبا للاختصار والسهولة، وليظهر أنّ ما يلزم إنما يلزم عن نفس التأليف لا أن اللازم إنما لزم في هذا القول لأنه في الوجود كذلك، فكنا نرتاب هل هذا اللازم الذي لزم إنما لزم عن التأليف أو لأنه في الوجود لازم. فإذا أخذنا هذ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @eaqalil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 814,276 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مُسْكَة | جهاد الخُزاعي” (@eaqalil), 2,180 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eaqalil.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.