Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Книжная полка Гитман

@e_gitman

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

468subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002083776425
TypeChannel
Username@e_gitman
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/e_gitman

Growth

4689 Aug 2026, 10:45 — 468 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 12:33 — 468 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 10:459 Aug 2026, 12:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 467–469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:33468no change
9 Aug 2026, 10:45468first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.9%
avg views ÷ 468 subscribers
Avg views / post
285
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 June 20269 August 2026)
Views total2,281
Reactions total343
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

963 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
31332.5%
🔥16717.3%
😁11812.3%
👍727.48%
🤣626.44%
👀363.74%
😱363.74%
😭303.12%
🎉272.80%
🤗222.28%
❤‍🔥212.18%
😢202.08%
👏161.66%
😍121.25%
30.312%
🏆20.208%
🤩20.208%
🎄10.104%
👌10.104%
🤷‍♀10.104%
1 further kind10.104%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 963reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC102 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Тем, кто не читает китайцев, пост лучше пропустить)) В том фике, который следует за «Нарушенными правилами», у нас есть шансы увидеть Вэй Усяня отцом двоих детей. Не факт, что он идеален, но я обожаю их сцены. В общем, Вэй Усянь вёл весьма спокойную жизнь. Да, в двадцать два года он стал отцом двоих детей. При этом, что обидно, ни разу предварительно не занявшись с кем-то любовью. — Кажется, редиску хорошо поливаю

🔥156🥰1

8 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC160 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Теория леопардовых лосин профессора Снейпа А вы не знали, что у профессора Снейпа были леопардовые лосины? Тогда позвольте, я познакомлю вас с этой прекрасной теорией. Соавтор — Советник. Да, юмор на грани стёба, чувствительные могут отойти от экрана. Читать тут.

😁22👏8🔥21

7 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC183 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кадр без контекста. Контекст предложите сами)

28👍3🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC194 views43 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Почему. Почему. Почему я так люблю изучать другие культуры и так мучительно учу языки? (ага, угадайте, чем я пытаюсь заниматься второй раз в жизни, опять обливаясь кровью из взорванных мозгов). А вам прекрасное стихотворение. Автор — Мэн Хаожань, годы жизни 688–740, перевод Л.З. Эйдлин. Оно же восхитительно.

33🔥10

3 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC313 views77 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Собираю подборку того, как моё нетрудное имя — Kate — пишут в малайских старбаксах. Kait Kaith Keith Keit Kyt Tait Tate Но эти ребята переплюнули всех. Поздравьте меня, меня назвали Воротами. И к слову, вторая любимая история про имена. В приложении кафешки зарегистрировалась под своим именем — Екатерина Коновалова (да-да, Гитман — псевдоним)) На кассе стоял китайский парень. Наговорил комплиментов, отсканировал

🤣54😁124🔥4🏆2❤‍🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC302 views57 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Я: напишу за выходные две главы Моя левая рука: защемим нерв, пожалуй Тем не менее, новая глава китайцев в Хогвартсе уже ждёт вас, а следующая активно пишется)

🎉27😱228

22 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC514 views52 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Думаю, лучше отзыва я не получу уже никогда. У меня чай пошёл носом, считаю, что это генитально. Конкурс на ответ открыт

😁46🔥42

20 Jul 2026, 16:59 UTC513 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Аттракцион неслыханной щедрости — Бумажный динозавр в бумаге за 380 рублей. Я бы купила пару экземпляров, если бы была в России, честно)) Если планировали поставить на полку — сейчас хороший момент. Заказ через приложение издательства.

👍13😍93🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC568 views53 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Странными путями ходит мысль. Где-то в обсуждениях под новым фиком встретился комментарий: «Да что эти чинуши могут сделать против настоящих серьёзных воинов?» И сразу я вспомнила далеко не самую известную, но сильную трагедию Шекспира «Кориолан». Причём в совершенно конкретной постановке. Изначально это история о том, как воинская гордость мешает смирению, и в итоге могущественный всесильный Кориолан из-за своего

👍31193

11 Jul 2026, 06:02 UTC419 views52 reactionsread 9 August 2026

«Открой собаку»: пять главных вопросов для создания живого персонажа — Посмотри в собаке. — Как это — посмотри в собаке? — В смысле, открой её. — Твою мать, это не консервная банка бобов, что значит „открой её“?!» (с) художественный фильм «Спиздили». Простите, этого поста не было бы, если бы мы с Советником вчера не собирали персонажей для нового фика и не выяснили, что фраза «открой собаку» описывает процесс лучше

👍24🔥1711

9 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC411 views67 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Оно, новое — про что? «Ещё немного нарушенных правил» Хогвартс готовится принимать у себя Турнир трёх волшебников — легендарное соревнование учеников от трёх знаменитых школ. Только на этот раз школ четыре. И не случайно: год назад после длительной изоляции на политической арене магического мира появился новый игрок — Китай. Самобытные методы, опасное оружие, огромное население, богатство. Никто не знает, чего хот

🔥4321👀3

8 Jul 2026, 13:18 UTC331 views74 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Странное размышление о творческом стыде. Вы уже заметили, что последние полгода я упала с головой в фандом «Магистра дьявольского культа» и никак не могу оттуда выбраться. И всё это время меня грызёт стыд. Причин у него несколько. 1. Я забросила несколько оригинальных идей. Вот не идут, не лезет, не могу. Но я вроде как многое анонсировала, читатели ждут моих историй, а их всё нет. Не соответствую ожиданиям людей →

46❤‍🔥14👏7🔥5👌1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @e_gitman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 100,547 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Книжная полка Гитман” (@e_gitman), 468 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e_gitman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.