Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

eBooks Cafe

@eBooksCafe

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

62,632subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327292632
TypeChannel
Username@eBooksCafe
DescriptionSharing snippets from books & various pockets of the internet Buy ads: https://telega.io/c/ebookscafe Contact: @Blissmanagerbot for Credits & queries
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/eBooksCafe

Growth

62,60762,63462,620.56 August 2026 — 62,607 subscribers7 August 2026 — 62,623 subscribers8 August 2026 — 62,634 subscribers9 August 2026 — 62,620 subscribers10 August 2026 — 62,608 subscribers11 August 2026 — 62,622 subscribers12 August 2026 — 62,632 subscribers62,6326 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 62,603–62,638 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:3862,632+10
11 Aug 2026, 10:1362,622+14
10 Aug 2026, 09:5862,608-12
9 Aug 2026, 06:4262,620-14
8 Aug 2026, 08:0062,634+11
7 Aug 2026, 05:0862,623+16
6 Aug 2026, 09:1562,607first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.95%
avg views ÷ 62,632 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,230
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.602%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held22 (21 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total24,920
Reactions total150
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,030
Videos
167
Links
210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

777 reactions across 22 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
58074.6%
🔥10213.1%
❤‍🔥445.66%
💯334.25%
81.03%
👌60.772%
💔40.515%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 777reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC≈2,550 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

If someone hates you and they don't know you, they don't hate you. They hate the person you remind them of. @ebookscafe

19🔥8💯3❤‍🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈2,920 views29 reactionsread 12 August 2026

The average person does not try to solve their problems or struggles. They get stuck in a routine and live the same day over and over. It does not cross their minds to snap out of it, engage in strategic thinking, and change direction so they can eventually reach a more advantageous position in life. If you want to get ahead of 90% of people, all you have to do is pause, think, and actually attempt to overcome the s

23🔥4💯2

24 Jul 2026, 18:22 UTC≈8,250 views40 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Life hack: Do hard things with fun people @ebookscafe

24❤‍🔥141💔1

16 Jul 2026, 12:54 UTC≈11,200 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026

People say you have to "enjoy the process" of creating a successful business/career, but sometimes the "process" really sucks. It is hard, lonely, and requires a lot of sacrifice. There are good, energizing, amazing things too... But nowhere near "enjoying it all." Get real. @ebookscafe

41💯6👌3

Signed Amir Mukhtar

9 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC≈13,500 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

194

Signed Amir Mukhtar

8 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC≈12,300 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026

You’re unhappy because you do nothing worth being proud of. You haven’t done anything hard in months. You haven’t made anything. Fought for anything. Dared anything. You coast, consume, complain, and repeat. Then you wonder why life feels empty. Fulfillment comes from building something that outlives your moods. @ebookscafe

65🔥9💯5💔3

Signed Amir Mukhtar

6 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC≈12,100 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@ebookscafe

20

Signed Amir Mukhtar

30 Jun 2026, 08:43 UTC≈11,600 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Get in the arena.... It is not too late, but time is ticking. Want to do something? The time is now. You don't have forever. @ebooksCafe

🔥136

Signed Amir Mukhtar

25 Jun 2026, 20:52 UTC≈12,900 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

@ebooksCafe

22🔥6❤‍🔥3

Signed Amir Mukhtar

16 Jun 2026, 08:34 UTC≈14,500 views55 reactionsread 12 August 2026

You need to be attention-span-maxing. Watch 3 hour talks. Read books for hours at a time. Watch the entire movie, without taking a break. Stare into space losing yourself in thought and imagination. Do not check your phone. The opposite of brain-rot is the will to focus in a culture which wants to pull you every other way. @ebookscafe

36💯133🔥3

14 Jun 2026, 14:51 UTC≈13,500 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Stress is great for brute-forcing mindless tasks, but it absolutely destroys your ability to think spatially. It destroys your creativity, which is the one thing that will give you a competitive advantage over everyone optimizing for productivity. @ebookscafe

12🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @eBooksCafe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 143,570 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

English Books Magazines Novels
@Novels_English_Books_Magazines · 218,257
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
eBook Room
@eBookRoom · 328,583
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 12 August 2026
Books
@books · 214,063
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
Books Hub: Ebook & Audiobook x Classics
@bookshub25 · 277,127
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“eBooks Cafe” (@eBooksCafe), 62,632 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eBooksCafe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.