Channel
@durovdice
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001092166684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @durovdice |
| Description | Tutti i tweet di Durov. https://twitter.com/durov Scopri anche: #⃣ @hashTelegram 🔵 @Twittelegram Questo canale fa parte del Network di @OpenTelegramItalia ➡️ Vieni a trovarci in @OTInetwork 🎉 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 31 October 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/durovdice |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 58 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 58 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 October 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
🗣️ @durovdice: @jack @lobushkin @elonmusk @micsolana @telegram Thank you for the feedback 🙏 You can now have a Telegram account without a SIM card and log in using blockchain-powered anonymous numbers – https://t.co/2PjN5Y8upe December 06, 2022 at 11:21PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: The time when the inefficiencies of legacy platforms justified centralization should be long gone. With technologies like TON reaching their potential, the blockchain industry should be finally able to deliver on its core mission – giving the power back to the people. November 30, 2022 at 06:15PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: Telegram's next step is to build a set of decentralized tools, including non-custodial wallets and decentralized exchanges for millions of people to securely trade and store cryptocurrencies. This way we can fix the wrongs caused by the current excessive centralization. November 30, 2022 at 06:15PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: Fragment has been an amazing success, with 50 million USD worth of usernames sold there in less than a month. This week, Fragment will expand beyond usernames. November 30, 2022 at 06:15PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: It took only 5 weeks and 5 people to put together Fragment – a fully decentralized auction platform. We were able to do this because Fragment is based on The Open Network, or TON – a blockchain platform that is fast and efficient enough to host popular applications. November 30, 2022 at 06:15PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: We, developers, should steer the blockchain industry away from centralization by building fast and easy-to-use decentralized applications for the masses. Such projects are finally feasible today. November 30, 2022 at 06:15PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: The solution is clear: blockchain-based projects should go back to their roots – decentralization. Cryptocurrency users should switch to trustless transactions and self-hosted wallets. November 30, 2022 at 06:15PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: The blockchain industry was built on the promise of decentralization, but ended up being concentrated in the hands of a few who began to abuse their power. November 30, 2022 at 06:15PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: Hackers could have full access (!) to everything on the phones of WhatsApp users – https://t.co/kefCbrdpc8 October 05, 2022 at 11:16PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: Telegram's update has been stuck in Apple's "review" for two weeks, without any word from the App Store. If Telegram, one of the top 10 most popular apps globally, gets this treatment from Apple, imagine the difficulties faced by smaller app developers. https://t.co/c0l6OHUbwy August 10, 2022 at 11:02PM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: https://t.co/lA6kB3aVoK April 29, 2022 at 01:06AM 🔗 Link al tweet
🗣️ @durovdice: Telegram is among the top 5 most downloaded apps in the world. Of these top 5 apps, Telegram is the only one that doesn't spend billions on marketing to buy downloads. In a way, we are the only app that is on the list purely because it is genuinely loved by the people 💙 April 29, 2022 at 01:05AM 🔗 Link al tweet
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @durovdice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@durovdice named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Durov dice | OTI” (@durovdice), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/durovdice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.