Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Настя, хочу курс!

@dumatidelat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

667subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001123320817
TypeChannel
Username@dumatidelat
DescriptionКанал для экспертов, жаждущих самореализации и узнаваемости 🚀 🙋🏻‍♀️Анастасия [dumatidelat] Плотникова ▪️Методолог, маркетолог ▪️Автор 📚 «Как создать свой онлайн-курс» и «Как выйти в онлайн» ▪️Препод в Нетологии
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 April 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/dumatidelat

Growth

6676 Aug 2026, 20:34 — 667 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:46 — 667 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:346 Aug 2026, 20:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 666–668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 20:46667no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:34667first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 5 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 667 subscribers
Avg views / post
135
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held14 (5 June 202629 July 2026)
Views total945
Reactions total57
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
709
Videos
97
Links
239

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 13 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5343.8%
2924.0%
👍1512.4%
❤‍🔥75.79%
👏64.96%
💯54.13%
😢21.65%
🏆10.826%
👀10.826%
😁10.826%
🤝10.826%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 10:40 UTC78 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

#Буднипродюсера или «Над чем я сейчас работаю, пока ничего не пишу в канал» 👇👇 Поехали: 🟢 Закончили и сдали недавно заказчику курс «по земле» - как получить землю от государства. Очень интересная тема и очень легкий заказчик, сам активно включающийся. 🟡 Медленно как черепашка тянется работа над курсом по исламу. Тема очень интересная, я бы сказала - про то, как жить в исламской традиции и понимать культуру и быт

10❤‍🔥7

28 Jul 2026, 09:22 UTC96 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Старый мой лайфхак для продуктивности и полноценности бытия 👇👇👇 ✅Читать новости и листать ленту соцсетей ПОСЛЕ 12.00. Эффект феноменальный и уже после одного дня. Я вот уже неделю так живу, очень кайфово. Суть - не в том, что экономишь время, а в том, что сохраняешь ЭНЕРГИЮ для своих дел. А не отдаешь ее эгрегору. Как начинаешь, сложно только первый день, но важно чем-то себя с утра занять и телефон отложить в др

3💯3😁1

24 Jul 2026, 08:23 UTC152 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У меня вышла статья про Lifelong learning, а я молчу. Непорядок😅 👉Вот: https://getcourse.ru/magazine/nepreryvnoe-obuchenie Стиль написания скорее пятничный, нежели мой привычно-душный. Буду признательна за реакции и репосты👌 Наслаждайтесь 😇

👍8

16 Jul 2026, 17:09 UTC168 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @neturgenevaPhoto

📚Как я уместила 40-часовой курс в 10 встреч В прошлом году я вела в РГУУ большой курс по медиапроектам: 12 лекций и 16 семинаров. И даже там я не успела дать студентам всё, что хотела. А в этом семестре у магистров всего 10 встреч на ту же тему. Вопрос: как запихнуть объёмный курс в короткий формат, чтобы студенты реально чему-то научились? 🖇Мне помогла механика из книги А. Плотниковой «Сам себе методолог». Суть ме

👏5

16 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC153 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Считаю, это успех, если меня уже в Тредс рекламируют 😌🤩

🔥3

16 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC156 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Настя, привет! Твою книгу рекомендуют в Тредс 🔥

🔥134

1 Jul 2026, 08:57 UTC260 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Учусь я значит на музыкальном курсе 🎵 и не могу развидеть, как методические ошибки губят и усвоение материала и мотивацию учеников. Это можно было бы назвать моей профдеформацией, но это БАЗОВЫЙ МИНИМУМ хорошего онлайн-курса. Что же мне так не понравилось: ⤵️⤵️ 1️⃣❌ 2 часа на знакомство и установку программы Нас 10 человек, и мы вышли в эфир в 21.00, чтобы поставить программу на комп и представиться. Ладно - зна

🔥13

15 Jun 2026, 10:51 UTC208 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Итак, какие инструменты у меня в стратегии продвижения книги про тренинги: 1️⃣ Чтение книги бета-ридерами. Как это поможет продажам: ✔️ - меня с моей книгой уже узнали в трех тренерских сообществах (=будут рекомендовать), круг потенциальной ЦА прирос на 20+ человек ✔️ - я получила первые отзывы на еще не опубликованную книгу ✔️ - я получила «словечки» целевой аудитории (в комментариях и обратной связи), смогу их

👍53

15 Jun 2026, 10:29 UTC167 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

[ СТРАТЕГИЯ ПРОДВИЖЕНИЯ ] 👇👇 Любой продукт надо продвигать, если вы хотите заработать на нем. Даже когда продукт реально классный, если его не продвигать - о нем никто не узнает. Таковы правила игры. Но. Обычно, когда мы читаем про продвижение, мозг сразу подкидывает ассоциации только с соцсетями. 👇 «Ой, теперь надо что-то писать в соцсети.. А я не умею…» «Надо таргетолога нанять… чтобы лиды гнал.. в мою ворон

8

9 Jun 2026, 04:40 UTC183 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Едем в машине, слушаем радио 📻 - рекламируют какое-то чудо-изобретение: «Как заставить ребенка пить воду, а не сладкие газировки? Очень просто! 👇👇👇 Ученые разработали супер-бутылку, в которую если наливаешь сладкую газировку, то ничего не происходит. А если наливаешь обычную воду и пьешь - то на стекле бутылки проявляются рисунки!» «Какая хрень🧐, - думаю я, слушая это. Зачем какие-то навороты изобретать, если можно

🔥10💯2🏆1🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @dumatidelat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,074,562 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Настя, хочу курс!” (@dumatidelat), 667 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dumatidelat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.