Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 迪拜头条大事件 @dubai4

Channel

迪拜头条大事件 @dubai4

@dubai4

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21,011subscribers

-5,254 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001700223573
TypeChannel
Username@dubai4
Description🇦🇪迪拜大事件—生活分享交流,热衷分享中东文化,发布迪拜最新新闻咨询!迪拜相关问题可以在评论区交流! 📮投稿爆料合作联系 @KL066 #迪拜 #dubai #迪拜新闻 #迪拜华人 #迪拜吃瓜 #迪拜曝光
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dubai4

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 5 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@dubai4/29672 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC@JPZ05/273057 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC1.0013 minutes
@dubai4/29857 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC@JPZ05/274809 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC1.0024 minutes
@dubai4/30010 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC@JPZ05/2765010 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC1.0019 minutes
@dubai4/30212 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC@JPZ05/2783911 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC1.0022 minutes
@dubai4/31635 · this entry26 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC@JPZ05/3321326 Sept 2026, 14:54 UTC1.004 minutes
@dubai4/32730 · this entry9 Oct 2026, 13:19 UTC@JPZ05/342409 Oct 2026, 13:24 UTC1.005 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@JPZ05351 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.009 minutesthis entry (349–2)
@DSJ067200 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.991.6 hours@DSJ067 (184–16)
@FLB002148 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0077 minutes@FLB002 (98–50)
@laowo0574 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0044 minutes@laowo05 (58–16)
@MLXY0354 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9720 hoursthis entry (53–1)
@MBDSJ026 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9679 minutes@MBDSJ0 (17–9)
@SLLK0726 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9673 minutesthis entry (17–9)
@taiguo777723 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.1 hoursthis entry (16–7)
@ChinaDSJ18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.981.7 hoursthis entry (10–8)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 384 of the 384 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 727 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 5 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @laowo05. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 5 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

21,01126,26523,6387 August 202610 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net -5,254. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,223–27,053 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 08:1921,011-81
8 Nov 2026, 18:4721,092-57
7 Nov 2026, 10:5121,149-37
6 Nov 2026, 12:1721,186-39
5 Nov 2026, 11:1921,225-14
4 Nov 2026, 08:5621,239-59
3 Nov 2026, 10:1721,298-102
2 Nov 2026, 12:4621,400-24
1 Nov 2026, 11:3021,424-42
31 Oct 2026, 12:5021,466-30
30 Oct 2026, 12:4621,496-33
29 Oct 2026, 10:5521,529-35
28 Oct 2026, 12:1621,564-23
27 Oct 2026, 12:4621,587-30
26 Oct 2026, 13:5821,617-27
25 Oct 2026, 16:0621,644-27
24 Oct 2026, 17:2021,671-36
23 Oct 2026, 19:1821,707-39
22 Oct 2026, 21:2121,746-22
21 Oct 2026, 17:3021,768first reading

Engagement

731 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 90 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.41%
avg views ÷ 21,011 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
196 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
196
of 731 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held731 (7 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total387,634
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 03:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈27,900
Videos
≈5,590
Links
≈14,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 24m
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 162 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 151 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6737.4%
🔥3016.8%
👏2413.4%
🎉158.38%
🤩158.38%
👍147.82%
🥰147.82%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 731 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 731 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 196 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC2 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#网友分享 戴着手铐上班!这不是电影特效,是境外诈骗园区的真实日常! 听信海外高薪、包机票包吃住的招工广告,满怀憧憬出国赚钱,结果直接掉进人间炼狱。自由被完全剥夺,被逼迫坐在电脑前不停行骗。完不成业绩,打骂、体罚接踵而至,甚至被威胁:死也要死在电脑前面! 一边承受园区的折磨,一边被迫去欺骗国内的亲友,想求救都无路可走。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

12 Nov 2026, 03:00 UTC1 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

今天看到这个帖子 说的是黑灰产买频道广告 然后放入诱饵链接 黑取读者手机盗U的 更有甚者,一些台子广告 实际上挂羊头卖狗肉 明面他在推广台子做引流 实际目的则是引流到台子后 还是以盗U为终极目的 真让人叹为观止 说到频道放广告盗U 之前也有个迪拜的人找到我 8年前他混西港 后来他去了迪拜 一直到现在 他毫不掩饰跟我讲 希望放个广告,目的是盗U 问我多少钱直接说 我表示拒绝,太特么丧良心了~~ 另外,据说啊 文森特虽然早被抓走了 但整个盗U界 业务量现在最大的 依然还是太子系 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

12 Nov 2026, 01:00 UTC6 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

缅甸网络诈骗产业转向地下运营,诈骗活动向仰光、曼德勒等地扩散 缅甸军方持续打击妙瓦底水沟谷、KK Park等网络诈骗园区后,部分诈骗团伙并未停止活动,而是转移至其他地区,并逐渐转向分散化、居家办公等隐蔽运营模式 调查发现,部分诈骗团伙重新招募曾在诈骗园区工作的缅甸籍人员,通过Telegram等平台组织团队,在家中寻找潜在受害者,再由专门人员接手实施诈骗 目前,诈骗团伙主要通过TikTok寻找日本籍受害者,引导对方转至LINE聊天,并利用虚假身份、AI翻译及视频通话建立信任,最终诱骗受害者投资加密货币。 与此同时,诈骗产业也在缅甸境内不断转移。除妙瓦底水沟谷、KK Park外,部分诈骗园区已向克伦邦德克塔、皎克、法久等地区扩散,仰光、曼德勒及掸邦东部也陆续出现相关活动。 报道还指出,一些诈骗团伙通过Telegram招聘频道、社交媒体广告及电脑培训班招募年轻人,以高薪工作为诱饵,吸引缅甸青年加入诈骗产业。 调查认为,尽管…

11 Nov 2026, 16:34 UTC≈4,300 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#群友反馈:马来西亚槟城柔鲁收费站北上方向别墅区,大稽查行动凌晨十二点开始!!!!!大家小心!!! 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 15:19 UTC≈4,980 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#菲律宾 私人飞机惊传坠毁!机上据称载有6名外国人 11月10日,菲律宾南达沃省突然传出 #私人飞机坠毁 消息,当地居民称听到巨大声响并发现烟雾,怀疑发生空难。由于传出机上载有6名外国人,救援人员立即展开搜寻,一度引发外界关注。 不过,事情随后出现反转!菲律宾民航局核实确认,涉事飞机编号为N882TP,已于当天中午12时13分安全降落在武端市机场,所谓坠机事故纯属误报。 目前,机上6名外国人的说法也尚未得到进一步证实,这场空难警报最终有惊无险。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 15:08 UTC≈3,710 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#菲律宾 海岸警卫队昨日通报,机动船“Princess Ruby Ann-1”号9日在巴拉望省利纳帕坎镇卡利邦邦安岛附近海域航行时,因螺旋桨 #传动轴断裂 而失去动力。 海岸警卫队接报后,派遣新科拉拉扬及圣费尔南多分站人员赶赴现场,以拖缆将船只拖回爱妮岛圣费尔南多港。 经清点确认,包括船长在内的29名乘客及船员均安全,无人受伤。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 14:49 UTC≈4,450 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#群友投稿:最近老挝有不少捞人反被抓的事,大家有没有刷到? 万象有个翻译,想去帮被抓的中国人打听情况、想办法捞人,结果人没捞出来,自己当场被扣下调查。还有个中国人开奔驰跑到电诈抓捕现场捞人,直接一并被带走。还有很多同类事件没对外报道。赚钱有风险,捞人一定要谨慎。 很多人会疑惑:我只是帮朋友问问情况,怎么自己也出事?今天结合真实案例跟大家聊聊。 最近找我处理案件的人特别多,一天几十条咨询,有涉嫌电诈、贩毒、非法持枪,还有电子烟批发、送货的。我发现一个普遍问题:家属朋友过来,大多会隐瞒实情、避重就轻。明明是电诈骨干,只说自己就是打工的;查到大量毒品,说只是自己吸食;房间搜出几百上千支电子烟,还说不是用来卖的。 很多人觉得卖电子烟是小事,但在老挝,电子烟管控很严,大批量批发、运输、销售属于严重刑事风险,不是交点罚款就能了事。前两天有个做电子烟批发的网友找我,他手下很多送货的被抓,问我能不能摆平。他说以前花钱就能解决,现在不一样…

11 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC≈3,440 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#柬埔寨新闻 柬埔寨王宫前的区域已进行了装饰布置,并悬挂了众多旗帜,以庆祝柬埔寨即将举办第20届法语国家峰会。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈3,950 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#网友提问 年龄并非决定一切关系的唯一因素。❤️ 让我们澄清另一个误解。 菲律宾女性嫁给年长的外国男性,并不意味着她觊觎他的金钱、养老金或经济保障。 人们坠入爱河的原因各不相同。有些人从年长者身上寻求陪伴、情感联结、共同的价值观、理解、成熟和真挚的爱。 没错,经济稳定在婚姻中固然重要,但这并不意味着金钱是两个人选择彼此的唯一原因。 你不能仅仅通过伴侣的年龄、国籍或经济状况来判断他们的意图。 要观察他们如何对待彼此,如何沟通,如何应对挑战,以及是否存在真挚的爱、尊重、诚实和承诺。 我们也要记住,年龄差距较大的关系仍然需要健康的界限、平等的尊重以及双方的发言权。 年龄差距并不一定意味着一段感情是假的,就像年龄相近也不一定意味着一段感情是真的一样。 不要以貌取人,先去了解他们背后的人。 你怎么看?人们是否应该停止认为所有嫁给年长外国人的菲律宾女性都是拜金女呢? 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延…

11 Nov 2026, 14:19 UTC≈3,790 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚突查度假村 7名中国男子 #持旅游签证打工 被抓 11月11日消息,#马来西亚 沙巴州移民局近日突袭仙本那一家度假村,发现7名中国籍男子持短期社交访问准证非法工作,当场将其扣留。更令人意外的是,涉事度假村不仅没有取得旅游经营许可,也没有地方政府颁发的营业执照。 此次行动于11月8日至9日展开,沙巴州移民局出动102名执法人员,检查6处场所、324人,共扣留32名涉嫌违反移民法规的外国人。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 14:09 UTC≈3,900 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#网友投稿:此路不通!现在想从缅甸走小路回中国,真没那么容易了。 上个星期三,我们老大硬塞了一个人情单,要把一个从缅甸腊戌出发的人,通过边境小路送回中国。老大也是个明事理、懂时局的人,只交代我们尽力而为,能把人安全送过去最好。 经过三天在边境徘徊、观察和等待,到了星期六,我们自认为准备得差不多了,便安排两名缅甸边境原住民带人正式出发。 没想到,出发不到五个小时,整队人就失联了。起初我们并不意外,但超过十二个小时仍联系不上,基本判断这次走小路回中国失败了,很可能已经被抓。 说说现在中缅边境走小路的情况。以我七年的带队经验来看,从中国走小路进入缅甸,成功率不到25%;从缅甸走小路回中国,成功率更是不足15%。这些只是我个人的经验判断。 嘿嘿,情况就是这么个情况。不是夸,也不是吹,中国边防武警的人员素质和装备水平确实很强。我认为,他们能不能抓到偷渡人员,很多时候不是能力问题,而是想不想抓的问题。 干了七年这一行,我越来越觉得…

11 Nov 2026, 13:49 UTC≈4,430 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#小菲提问 这里有人和伴侣一起去中国,即使关系并不好也坚持下来了吗?我很想听听你们的经历。 其实,我和伴侣一起去中国是因为我完全信任他。我信任他,选择和他共度一生,但不幸的是,他背叛了我,而且还对我进行家暴。 现在最难的是我们有了孩子。孩子的需求和开销也很大,所以即使我想离开,也不知道该如何重新开始。 我也觉得,即使我在菲律宾工作,我可能也无法独自承担孩子的所有经济责任和开销。 说实话,我不知道什么是正确的选择。我左右为难,一方面想选择自己的平静和安全,另一方面又想确保孩子拥有所需的一切。 对于那些经历过类似情况的人,特别是和伴侣一起移居中国的人,你们的经历如何?你们是如何应对的?非常感谢你们的建议。请不要评判我。我只是想听听有类似经历的人的看法。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1…

Showing the 12 most recent of 731 posts we hold for @dubai4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“迪拜头条大事件 @dubai4” (@dubai4), 21,011 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dubai4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.