Channel
@ChinaDSJ
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50,443subscribers
-1,145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001713792840 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ChinaDSJ |
| Description | “联接中外，沟通世界”是我们的使命，中国新闻大事件通过及时准确、角度独特的国内与国际资讯和深度分析，消除中国与世界的信息鸿沟；通过打造多语种跨文化的融媒体服务平台，助力中国品牌走向成功。 投稿机器人 @ChinaDSJBot #中国 #大陆 #内地 #国内 #境内 #港澳台 #China #Chinese #PRC #Sino #Cathay #Serica #Middle Kingdom #Chine #Sina #Китай #Kitay #ちゅうごく #Chūgoku |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ChinaDSJ |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 50,443 | -406 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 50,849 | -118 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 50,967 | -87 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 51,054 | -246 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 51,300 | -179 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:51 | 51,479 | -105 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:50 | 51,584 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 51,588 | first reading |
208 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 42 of 208 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 208 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 229,706 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
44 reactions across 41 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 95.5% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#求助下广大网友：来到东南亚好几年了，没赚到钱，长期没有性生活，每天晚上都是靠打飞机渡过 现在每次30秒就完事了，今年我才22，再这样以后就废了，有没有办法拯救下。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料： @KL066
东南亚灰产现状惨不忍睹 亲历东南亚灰产现状，从柬埔寨辗转到三佛塔，眼前的景象真他妈惨不忍睹：星链一封锁，全网直接瘫痪，整个园区彻底停摆。 负责人直接摆烂，把员工扔一边不管死活，一分钱收益都没赚到，人被困在异地，连个去处都没有。别看三佛塔暂时还算安稳，断网已经把所有灰色产业给掐死了，周边大批公司解散跑路。 现在东南亚各国都出台了严苛的反电诈法案，国内跨境打击也从没松过手。灰产早就没有任何生存空间了。不管是网赌、电诈还是洗钱，这些灰色行当全是违法犯罪。继续留在境外，随时可能吃当地重刑；想回国，也得依法被追责。哪怕没开单、没获利，只要长期待在窝点，照样要判刑。 海外那些高薪灰产全是坑人的陷阱，这条路早就彻底封死了。及时回头，才是唯一的出路。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： …
柬埔寨波贝AGA全是骗子速避坑 波贝的AGA SPORT全都是骗子！ 一个中国人和本地人一起开的KTV，互相勾结专门骗钱的地方！ 大家一定要避坑，别再被他们坑了！ 柬埔寨波贝ABA银行路口进去不远，有个叫AGA的地方，里面几个老东西。其中一个叫力哥的老东西，骗钱直接跑路，操他妈的死全家狗东西！捞人救命的钱也敢骗，简直丧尽天良！ 捞人先收钱，前后给了36000U，收了钱就一直拖。最开始说一个星期，然后又一个星期，再一个月，现在都快两个月了，直接把人拉黑，还威胁说要找麻烦，真他妈可笑。救命钱是拿命换来的，等着吧，留着给你收尸用！ 知情者提供线索能协助抓到人，或者直接把人送到指定地方的，必有重谢！ 有赏金猎人也可以联系，价格好商量！KILL_AGA 骗子别来烦，来骗的一样死全家！ 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aC…
河内7年轻人持剑追砍被起诉 越南河内：7名年轻人深夜持剑追砍陌生人，7人都被刑事起诉了。 8月13日，河内警方通报，一起深夜持剑追砍陌生人的案子已经侦破，7名17到19岁的年轻人被刑事起诉。警方指控他们涉嫌扰乱公共秩序和故意伤害。 调查显示，7月8日晚上，几名年轻人在河内周边骑摩托车兜风。后来其中一人叫来同伙，还从家里拿出两把剑，一把大概1米长的日本剑，还有一把自制剑，说要是碰到有人挑衅就动手。 接着，5名成员带着刀剑骑摩托高速乱飙，途经杨内、河东AEON购物中心、美亭体育场好几个地方，期间还蛇形驾驶、鸣笛轰油门、逆向行驶，相当危险。 9日凌晨2点10分左右，这伙人在阮清平路看到两名骑摩托车的年轻人。双方之前根本不认识，也没有任何矛盾，但这伙人突然掉头追上去，把对方逼到摔倒。 随后两名成员下车，拿着剑连续砍向受害者，还把对方的摩托车砍坏了。受害者手腕、手背、手臂和小腿多处受伤，被送去医院救治。 警方很快抓获了涉案人…
越南两男子持刀互砍被起诉 越南河静省：因为修通往家族墓地的路闹矛盾，两男子持刀互砍，最后被起诉了。 8月13日，河静省检察机关完成起诉书，依法起诉陈文松（1988年生）和黎文东（1971年生），罪名是“非法使用军用武器”。 调查显示，两人因为修家族墓地道路的问题起了冲突。3月24日上午，他们在丹海社东边村动手，拿刀互相砍。陈文松右手手指受伤，黎文东右手手指和左臂也挂彩，双方伤情评定都是2%。 两人之前都表示不要求警方按故意伤害罪追究对方，所以警方没对互殴致伤的部分立案，只是分别给了他们700万越南盾的行政罚款。 可事情没完。鉴定结果出来后，两人用的刀分别长约65厘米和39.5厘米，都属于杀伤力比较高的刀具。按照越南相关武器管理规定，把这种高杀伤性刀具拿来非法侵害别人生命健康，就能被认定为军用武器。 检方因此认定两人行为已经涉嫌“非法使用军用武器罪”，目前案件材料已经移交河静省人民法院，等着依法审理。 赞助商广告 ✅ …
缅甸星链下一波封禁来袭 行业新闻：下一波封禁星链也要来了，目前根本没有任何办法能避免。马斯克这回是铁了心要收拾缅甸的星链，不知道各大盘总这次该怎么接招。 到目前为止，已经切断了缅甸电诈园区周边超过2500台星链设备的服务。8月15日到17日前后，那些靠漫游方式带进缅甸的“水货”或者异地注册的终端，基本都用不了了。 民间也在喊：面对这次8月中旬的大规模断网危机，缅甸当地有将近250个民间社会组织联合给SpaceX和相关方面发了公开信，希望他们能更精准一点，按地理坐标专门打电诈园区，别一刀切把整个非电诈区的平民和救援网络都搞成一片黑。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料： @KL066
为了生活，大家在东南亚都做过什么事情谋生呢？ 实不相瞒，我就是那个白天敲键盘、晚上还得做兼职的男人。现在敲键盘效益也不好，在马来西亚又能碰到挺多华人女生，沟通上没什么障碍，所以空闲时间就找本地小富婆接济接济。 兄弟们，想赚女人钱就别异想天开去找那种又好看又有钱的。那种优质女生有的是男人排队送钱给她们花，好差事根本轮不到咱们。像我们这种货色，就找个挫一点的去捧她、舔她，把她哄开心了，就有机会从她身上拿点生活费。各取所需，也没什么丢人的。 记住，大丈夫能屈能伸。只有先过好当下，才有机会在未来翻身。兄弟们都学会了吗？ 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料： @KL066
柬埔寨辉瑞资金盘诈骗曝光 网友爆料：柬埔寨有个叫“辉瑞中国”的资金盘项目，专门套用正规公司名字搞集资诈骗，已经坑了将近一万人，专盯国内中老年人下手！ 项目里的组长小鱼，对外叫李云辉，以前在财通金运园区创大公司当狗推。手下团队长张宝莲、郭宝根这帮人，把不少老年人骗得家破人亡。现在这货在波贝诈骗公司乐鑫集团当管理，继续用李云辉的名字在辉瑞资金盘里收割，还搞高压控制。另外组长盒子以前也在创大集团混过。 我以前给他当助理，经常被他打。跑路的前任总监“好运”也一样遭罪。还有组长“天成”，对外叫张赫。老子天天辛辛苦苦敲键盘帮他们骗人，结果整天挨打，动不动就问候家人，一点小事就是一巴掌，电棍都是家常便饭。形式都这样了，他妈的还不让我走，想走直接送移民局。 我现在已经回国了，你们等着我的报复吧！ 所有会员我都会去打电话举报。被你们骗过、收割过的人还少吗？广西团队的农品清，台湾团队的徐敏蓉，河南平顶山的郭果，人家八十多岁的老太婆帮你们做…
#菲律宾 #钟海兵 #石宇峰 钟海兵（19980721江西）、石宇峰（19991027广西）在菲律宾干绑架 你们一伙的几个人已经给你们挂上移民局黑名单了，注意不是不受欢迎人员黑名单，是涉案黑名单，最好小心点，被抓可有好果汁吃咯。 想洗黑就别做梦了，PNP和法院已经说了，除非本人亲自撤案，否则别想离开菲律宾。下一步就是拿材料去大使馆走流程，让你们老家的警察盘盘你们。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料： @KL066
❤1
唐格朗男子酒后杀害强奸20岁女子 8月11日，印尼万丹省唐格朗市Benda地区发生一起严重案件。 一名20岁女子SNA在出租屋内遇害并涉嫌遭到性侵，警方随后抓住一名姓氏缩写为KF的男子。 初步调查显示，嫌疑人当时处于醉酒状态。受害者男友最先发现遗体，马上通知朋友、邻居和房东，房东向警方报案。 警方接报后行动很快，不到1小时24分钟就把人抓到了。目前案件还在进一步调查，会继续查清具体经过和动机。这种畜生行径真他妈令人发指。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料： @KL066
缅甸小猛拉盘总回国，说好的版纳到昆明1.45，只给了4500 先让他走晚上在转等了两天信息也不回。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料： @KL066
#NO钱包冻结15万 平台下分到NO钱包后兑换USDT时直接被拒绝，资金被冻结，一共15万人民币。 客服要求提供手持身份证、手写暗号录屏、平台下分记录和提款地址，全得做成一个视频。 可本人人在国外，身份证在国内，没法提供手持原件证明身份，其他条件都能满足，结果就这样被卡住。 这操作看着像明吃，大额资金真得小心点，别一不小心就被冻住拿不回来，真他妈坑人。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器｜一键回国专线，稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航： @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料： @KL066
Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @ChinaDSJ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 897,612 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“中国新闻大事件” (@ChinaDSJ), 50,443 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ChinaDSJ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.