Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 缅北黑料新闻大事件

Channel

缅北黑料新闻大事件

@MBDSJ0

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

35,947subscribers

-7,397 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002659481107
TypeChannel
Username@MBDSJ0
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MBDSJ0

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 10 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@FLB002/129579 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC@MBDSJ0/23037 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTC1.0079 minutes
@FLB002/1403323 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC@MBDSJ0/23978 · this entry23 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC1.0025 minutes
@FLB002/1605820 Sept 2026, 13:11 UTC@MBDSJ0/25738 · this entry20 Sept 2026, 14:16 UTC1.0065 minutes
@FLB002/1618922 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC@MBDSJ0/25876 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 14:58 UTC1.0034 minutes
@FLB002/1654528 Sept 2026, 03:38 UTC@MBDSJ0/26198 · this entry28 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC1.006.7 hours
@MBDSJ0/27498 · this entry26 Oct 2026, 09:34 UTC@FLB002/1810826 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC1.0073 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@FLB002122 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9858 minutes@FLB002 (65–57)
@DSJ067117 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9775 minutes@DSJ067 (100–17)
@JPZ0590 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0070 minutesthis entry (62–28)
@SLLK0739 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9847 minutesthis entry (28–11)
@MLXY0329 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9923 hoursthis entry (27–2)
@dubai426 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9679 minutesthis entry (17–9)
@ChinaDSJ17 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9574 minutesthis entry (9–8)
@laowo0510 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9950 minutesthis entry (6–4)
@taiguo77778 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.6 hoursthis entry (5–3)
@dsj035 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.967 minutes@dsj03 (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 233 of the 233 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,403 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

35,94743,34439,645.57 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -7,397. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,837–44,454 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 08:0935,947-114
10 Nov 2026, 08:2036,061-122
8 Nov 2026, 22:1636,183-148
7 Nov 2026, 13:3036,331-75
6 Nov 2026, 13:5036,406-59
5 Nov 2026, 13:3536,465-52
4 Nov 2026, 15:4636,517-178
3 Nov 2026, 14:1036,695-309
2 Nov 2026, 15:5637,004-80
1 Nov 2026, 18:1137,084-74
31 Oct 2026, 17:0637,158-56
30 Oct 2026, 17:3037,214-78
29 Oct 2026, 14:4837,292-54
28 Oct 2026, 15:5637,346-54
27 Oct 2026, 16:5137,400-33
26 Oct 2026, 15:2637,433-33
25 Oct 2026, 17:0937,466-43
24 Oct 2026, 15:2837,509-59
23 Oct 2026, 12:5137,568-73
22 Oct 2026, 15:2037,641first reading

Engagement

1,410 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 185 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.19%
avg views ÷ 35,947 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,220
477 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.054%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
477
of 1,410 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 477 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held1,410 (7 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,060,531
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 23:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5h 09m
Average length
1m 04s

Measured directly from 288 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

76 reactions across 76 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3343.4%
🥰911.8%
👏810.5%
🤩810.5%
🎉79.21%
🔥67.89%
❤45.26%
💯11.32%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 3 September 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 477 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 14:20 UTC≈3,780 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#吃瓜 ▎MRTV4女演员与年长赞助商关系曝光,私生活引发热议 近日,MRTV4一名女演员与年长赞助商之间的亲密关系引发网络热议,相关内容在缅甸社交平台流传。 事件涉及双方私人关系及赞助往来,具体细节仍有待当事人回应。 ps:传送门小编发 评论区了 , 吃那么好? 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 14:18 UTC≈3,540 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#泰国 网络警察前日通报,两宗网络诈骗案共追回1,874,294泰铢,并将款项返还两名受害者。 警方在四色菊、北榄、巴吞他尼、乌汶及曼谷展开搜查,逮捕7名涉嫌转移诈骗资金人员。 首宗案件中,一名65岁退休女教师误信Facebook广告及LINE投资群,以“高回报任务”为由11次转账,损失近498万泰铢。警方冻结账户并追回约110万泰铢。 另案受害人遭诈骗者通过TikTok及LINE诱导参与“配图赚佣金”任务,22次转账损失逾110万泰铢。警方冻结涉案账户70万泰铢。案件仍在追查中。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 13:30 UTC≈4,150 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#老外投稿:几年前,我和朋友去普吉岛度假。我之前去过泰国,自认为对那里的夜生活有所了解。 我还特意叮嘱朋友,不要在酒吧里爱上哪个女孩,因为我知道,这样很容易就会失去理智。 旅行开始几天后,我的朋友就迷上了酒吧里的一个女孩。她还有一个比较害羞的泰国朋友,我姑且叫她 Mint 吧。Mint 一开始并不是我喜欢的类型,但和她相处了几个晚上后,我开始对她产生好感。 很快,我们几乎每天都形影不离。我们一起去海滩、外出吃饭,在我的酒店看电影,她几乎每天晚上都陪着我。她告诉我,她讨厌在酒吧工作,想好好学习,以后找份更好的工作。 旅行结束时,我已经爱上了她。她告诉我她爱我,我也回应了她。两个月后,我又回到了普吉岛。接下来的一年里,我去了好几次,因为我想见她。 奇怪的是,她从来没向我要过每月的生活费。我觉得这是个好兆头,因为我总是把她和那些向我要钱的女孩的故事做比较。 然后,一天晚上,她打电话告诉我,她怀孕了。 距离我上次见到她已经过…

11 Nov 2026, 12:53 UTC≈4,530 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#猎奇 之前刷到过,还以为只是段子, 没想到真有这道菜,,, 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 12:04 UTC15 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#网友提醒 曼德勒63街、玛哈敏一带拾荒者猖狂,这两人已作案3次,抓到那天绝不轻饶✌️✌️✌️(能拿的全部偷走)。玛哈敏63/64街一带住户请注意,连不值钱的东西都偷。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

11 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC≈4,260 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#缅甸央行行长下死命令:四个月内,全面完成反洗钱剩余两项行动计划! 打击洗钱和恐怖主义融资工作组会议,于11月9日午间在内比都缅甸中央银行举行,工作组主席钦奈乌博士在会上发表了上述讲话 会上,钦奈乌博士就缅甸代表团出席2026年10月26日至30日,在法国巴黎举行的国际合作伙伴评估工作组(ICRG)会议和金融行动特别工作组(FATF)全体会议的情况进行了说明 据悉,在上述会议中,与会各方讨论了缅甸在打击洗钱和网络诈骗方面的立法情况、剩余两项行动计划的推进进展、国家层面将打击网络诈骗列为优先事项的努力,以及国际合作和技术援助相关事宜。 根据上述会议的讨论,各方讨论了有效识别网络诈骗、继续调查和起诉与这些犯罪相关的洗钱活动、以及通过腐败相关洗钱案件进行举证的必要性 ps:缅央行在国际上几乎没有任何用作了,被许多国家制裁,不给正规汇款,地下钱庄就可以不计后果的掌握缅甸汇率上下浮动。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线…

11 Nov 2026, 09:24 UTC≈4,390 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 0审核|包出款🤩🤩🤩 东南亚大事件联合担保🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩(电子) 🤩亿级域名|78.COM 🤩官方飞投|充提自由 🔝实力派:78.COM 数字够短 品牌够大 🔥香港六合彩 · 独家盈利无上限! 🤩所有的特码🤩🤩倍 🤩连码三中三🤩🤩🤩倍 🤩百家乐全网最高起步返水🤩% 🤩电子|棋牌|捕鱼起步返水🤩.🤩% 🤩十三水|德州自主组队,无抽佣; 🏆电子单注🤩🤩🤩🤩U一拉; ⭐️百家乐真人视讯台红🤩🤩万U; 🚩诚招代理合作: 1.打码返佣,限指定平台; 2.可叠加占成,自选占成比例及游戏平台; 🤩🤩🤩🤩:@DL78 💥高额战绩,巅峰记录持续刷新: 🥇PP电子|极速糖果1000 玩家游戏中购买30000u超级免费旋转,高倍爆奖,最终拿下378万U,已出款; 🥈PG电子|麻将胡了 又又又欧气爆棚,5000U一拉,连番触发,单局斩获193万U; 🥉香港六合彩|特码49倍 爱拼才会赢,大佬单码下注18万U,一注直接拿下本期最高派…

11 Nov 2026, 05:13 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#中介回复 反正事情经过就是当时我们群里面五个,一个是我这边叫公司接人的,一个就是这川 cczbl,另外两个是骗子一个龙3,现场负责人不认识他,也加了不是他的飞机,类似于模仿ID,QIAZD 这个ID拉了两个骗子, 这个骗子就是这个川拉的,现场抬价,说好的价格因为付现金多30万泰铢?是想崩人吗,现场接不到人,我做中间人,我去跟你 cczbl 要放空费不很正常,后面他兄弟公司接的我也不知道,我是事后 cczbl 重新拉群 告诉我人被接走了,我去找了他们老板,他们老板说他没接,是他们兄弟公司接的,1.8万u他不要,然后我问他为什么接走人不说,他直接就说我给我介绍费。转了600,但是后面好像聊到这个事情说是给了1000,我实际收到600 你作为对接人,你不要崩人,你想AB挑,如果现场不是付现金。是付u。我这边接人公司不认识那边兵战负责人,那这个钱是不是被你 cczbl 拉的人黑吃黑AB跳了 cczbl 他跟接人公司…

👍1

11 Nov 2026, 04:42 UTC16 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#缅甸资讯 MNDAA持续扩大掸邦北部控制范围,缅甸军方保持沉默,地区或面临新一轮冲突风险 2023年“1027行动”后,果敢军(MNDAA)不断扩大在掸邦北部的控制范围,并在部分原由盟友德昂民族解放军(TNLA)控制的地区建立行政体系,今年3月还攻占了TNLA控制的贵概镇。 MNDAA不仅撤除腊戍—木姐公路沿线的TNLA军事据点,还将南坎镇纳入其所谓的“第一特区”,并于11月9日在当地开展安全宣传活动。 目前,MNDAA除控制老街、滚弄外,还控制掸邦北部至少8个城镇,并将相关地区划分为贵概、登尼、勐古和老街4个县,而缅甸军方对此尚未作出明显回应。 分析认为,MNDAA与中国关系密切,中国曾介入其与缅甸军方的停火谈判,而MNDAA在中缅边境贸易通道上的影响力不断扩大,可能使缅甸军方顾虑与其再次爆发大规模军事冲突。 此外,当地居民反映,MNDAA控制区出现中文招牌普及及地名更改等现象,例如将登尼镇改名为“木邦”,随着领…

👍1

11 Nov 2026, 04:31 UTC≈3,930 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯 霹雳州警方查获48台比特币矿机,疑涉非法接电挖矿 11月10日,马来西亚霹雳州警方联合国家能源公司(TNB)工作人员,在霹雳州 Seri Iskandar 一处住宅展开突击行动,现场查获48台比特币挖矿设备,怀疑有人通过非法连接电线的方式盗用电力进行加密货币挖矿。 据警方消息,执法人员在行动中还查获2台 Fast Ethernet 交换机、1台互联网路由器及1卷被剪断的电缆等物品。 警方初步怀疑,该住宅被用于非法加密货币挖矿活动,相关人员涉嫌未经许可连接电力线路,逃避正常电费支出。 目前,警方已针对案件展开进一步调查,并将依据《刑事法典》第427条及《1990年电力供应法》第31(1)条追查相关责任人。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT…

👍1

11 Nov 2026, 03:06 UTC15 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

#网友爆料 此中介,这是一个黑中介,让中介介绍模特,说好介绍费4000U,结果钱转到中介手里,不愿意把模特的介绍费个模特,这个中介是骗模特,我面试的时候合同说明是一年 给模特说6个月 连哄带骗把模特从柬埔寨骗到缅甸,现在模特工作几天,说中介不愿意支付给他哥哥1000U介绍费,模特不愿意签下合同协议,此中介联系不上,还说什么几把发哥不愿意支付 你发个jb的哥,sb中介,1000U,你今天在不处理,爆料你更多的丑事,1000U你跑,你接下来的生意怎么做,你不要以为你在柬埔寨很牛逼,圈子就那么大,都是做灰产的人,你不给人家介绍费。 此人有很多飞机用户介绍模特的幌子,其实就是一个骗招模特的人去其他公司工作,这就是一个骗中介费的垃圾。你在柬埔寨出门就应该被车撞死 ,请避免踩坑 还有实名身份证照片 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist…

10 Nov 2026, 14:11 UTC≈3,770 viewsread 11 November 2026
Video

#网友投稿 亚太保护费能不能降低下来了? 现在大环境不好,大家都不好做,成本太高,门槛也越来越高,很多公司面临倒闭,大家都是有目共睹。 希望有关部门或者有关人士看到此消息。 赞助商广告 ✅ 豆豆加速器|一键回国专线,稳定低延迟 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉😊 订阅全球新闻大事件频道👇 🔗 t.me/addlist/N5aCaCcVdno0MGU1 ⚠️ 失联导航: @KLJT88 ☎️ 投稿爆料: @KL066

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,410 posts we hold for @MBDSJ0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“缅北黑料新闻大事件” (@MBDSJ0), 35,947 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MBDSJ0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.