Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for drazdrofill

Channel

drazdrofill

@drazdrofillim

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

143subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001596332768
TypeChannel
Username@drazdrofillim
Created13 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drazdrofillim

Growth

142143142.510 August 2026 — 142 subscribers10 August 2026 — 142 subscribers17 August 2026 — 143 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 22:42143+1
10 Aug 2026, 23:03142no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:31142first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
42.9%
avg views ÷ 143 subscribers
Avg views / post
61.4
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
25.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held17 (22 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,043
Reactions total263
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

263 reactions across 17 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53210143328116818063312.5%
custom 5222141930799914283155.70%
custom 5434021120007235182155.70%
custom 5314610450673982022145.32%
custom 5321332430974525298145.32%
custom 5321010707859281676124.56%
custom 5321152858391879054124.56%
custom 5321496889567257445124.56%
custom 5222250408788912362114.18%
custom 5222347350495746647114.18%
custom 5314515901263927866114.18%
custom 5316611072210262885103.80%
custom 531454368111239887093.42%
custom 532110380127542385172.66%
custom 531465554353562415462.28%
custom 532113468209028698562.28%
custom 522242573364890114151.90%
custom 531664688794254415651.90%
custom 531688125571794995651.90%
custom 532114071222436649951.90%
17 further kinds4517.1%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 263reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC21 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Лето солнце жара ЕБАТЬ ГРОМ ХУЯРИТ

custom 53145436811123988708custom 53211038012754238515custom 53210453295906578822custom 53213607992335185602custom 53215081123168041172custom 53213324309745252981

8 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC25 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пу пу пу…..

custom 53166468879425441565custom 53211038012754238512custom 53213607992335185602custom 53145436811123988701custom 53213324309745252981

2 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC50 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Сидела думала какой же стиль напоминает мне его лицо, и мне подсказали что это очень похоже на триган Что думаете?

custom 53210143328116818066custom 53168812557179499563custom 52224257336489011412custom 52220136959613600711

1 Aug 2026, 23:51 UTC110 views25 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

2 версии моих новых обоев для телефона и планшета

custom 532101070785928167611custom 52224257336489011413custom 53214352825563625743custom 52222934529511544532custom 53210143328116818062custom 54340211200072351822custom 52220136959613600711custom 53168812557179499561

1 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC43 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Замутила себе голу апчик

custom 53146104506739820224custom 53214968895672574452custom 52223473504957466471

1 Aug 2026, 22:14 UTC34 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLUE_BUNNY7Photo

Стрижка + окрашивание 💔🥤🥤 #work_BlueBunny

custom 532149688956725744510custom 53146104506739820226custom 52223473504957466473custom 54340211200072351822

31 Jul 2026, 21:25 UTC52 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тяжело дрочить пока рисую

custom 522214193079991428311custom 53166110722102628856custom 54340211200072351825custom 53213324309745252981

31 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC54 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Уебище мое, как же бесит он 💀💀

custom 532133243097452529811custom 52221419307999142834custom 53166110722102628854custom 54340211200072351822

27 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC72 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Что вы знаете о моих скетчах?

custom 53211528583918790546custom 52222504087889123624custom 53145159012639278663

27 Jul 2026, 20:29 UTC66 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Оделся сам/мама наорала

custom 52222504087889123626custom 53145159012639278665custom 53211528583918790544

26 Jul 2026, 20:26 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ребята, выхожу в ночной эфир Я хочу нарисовать себе обои для телефона, напишите с кем нарисовать их пж Ну и можете в анонку просто идей (потенциальны) для новых артов накидать, буду рада услышать!! http://t.me/voprosy?start=ewnny0

custom 53145159012639278663custom 53211528583918790542custom 52222504087889123621

25 Jul 2026, 23:57 UTC72 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вас когда-нибудь вводили в лор Морта 20 минут и скидывали 20+ артов с ним? Одного человека отсюда точно да

custom 52290912179496170573custom 53213450281136074733custom 53214470164070168723

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @drazdrofillim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 956,059 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“drazdrofill” (@drazdrofillim), 143 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drazdrofillim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.