Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Воронья Настойка

Channel

Воронья Настойка

@corvushemmlok

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

317subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001577021695
TypeChannel
Username@corvushemmlok
Created19 April 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/corvushemmlok

Growth

317320318.57 August 2026 — 320 subscribers8 August 2026 — 320 subscribers16 August 2026 — 317 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 317–320 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:45317-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:32320no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:48320first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.9%
avg views ÷ 317 subscribers
Avg views / post
72.5
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held12 (5 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total870
Reactions total155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54386168896327613367447.7%
custom 53413336985350108282113.5%
custom 52605408926362730432012.9%
🍌1912.3%
custom 52895070583186118011610.3%
custom 528992187055502990642.58%
custom 533951360306410144810.645%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 03:27 UTC28 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

К тому как котёнок там вообще появился За день до того как я вышла на смену им покинули его в коробке, Чуня муня там сидела, и директор магазина решила её оставить что бы был маленький сотрудник у них в магазине 🥹 Ей там всё купили, и лежанку, и пеленки, и смеси, все что нужно что бы котеночек радовался От блох тоже вылечили покупали грязнульку

custom 54386168896327613369

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

8 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC29 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Хочу поделиться, это произошло в 2023 году. Я работала тогда в Яндекс смене, меня закинули в "Магнит косметик" который находился в какой то перде. Там меня встретила оч милая тетя и женщина за кассой у который случился понос после котлет и меня спросили могу ли я работать за кассой (Я не умела на тот момент )🌟 Это первое что я услышала как приехала, если что. Мне там сказали сделать херню по мелочи, посмотреть где чё

🍌6custom 54386168896327613366

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

7 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC56 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Больше мемов богу мемов #gta #gtao

custom 54386168896327613367

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

7 Aug 2026, 04:00 UTC67 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Еще немножко Виты #manhunt2 #ocart

custom 543861688963276133610custom 52895070583186118011

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

7 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC62 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤨🤏 #gta #gtao

custom 53413336985350108286custom 52605408926362730434custom 52895070583186118013custom 54386168896327613361

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

6 Aug 2026, 21:24 UTC74 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я попробую супрер про геймер майнкрафт #ask

custom 543861688963276133610custom 52895070583186118015

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

6 Aug 2026, 20:50 UTC75 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

САЙЛЕНТ УМОЛЯЮ СКЖИ ЧТО ЭТО ТВОЕ #ask

🍌5custom 54386168896327613363

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

6 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC76 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У меня есть анонки рибяятааа Можете писать всякую порнуху https://t.me/anonaskbot?start=fbxds1xst2n0f

custom 54386168896327613362

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

6 Aug 2026, 00:05 UTC84 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Скетчик хуетчик #gta #gtao

custom 52605408926362730437custom 52899218705550299064custom 53413336985350108283custom 54386168896327613362custom 52895070583186118011custom 53395136030641014481

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

5 Aug 2026, 23:49 UTC79 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Приколы в закрытке #gta #gtao

custom 52895070583186118016custom 54386168896327613361

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

5 Aug 2026, 22:50 UTC119 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока лето не закончилось вот вам летний Тони #gta #gtao

custom 543861688963276133610🍌7custom 53413336985350108285

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

5 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC121 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Лютый дрипчик хайп 21 века смотрите не обслюнявте экран пока любуетесь на голожопика Тони Принса 🥹🥹🥹 А еще нищая хуйня подбежала сфоткаться с самим Тони Принсом, не обращайте внимание! 😢 #gta #gtao

custom 543861688963276133613custom 52605408926362730439custom 53413336985350108287🍌1

Signed ᴡɪʟᴛᴇᴅᴘʀɪɴᴄᴇ [sʜᴇ/ʜᴇʀ]

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @corvushemmlok. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 229,887 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Воронья Настойка” (@corvushemmlok), 317 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corvushemmlok.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.