Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Травматолог Полывянный | Обучение врачей

@dr_vaspol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

443subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003888315314
TypeChannel
Username@dr_vaspol
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 26 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dr_vaspol

Growth

4334434387 August 2026 — 433 subscribers7 August 2026 — 433 subscribers7 August 2026 — 434 subscribers14 August 2026 — 443 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 432–445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 18:48443+9
7 Aug 2026, 21:35434+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:01433no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:48433first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 26 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
53.4%
avg views ÷ 443 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held12 (26 June 202628 July 2026)
Views total947
Reactions total51
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

175 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7744.0%
5430.9%
👍4022.9%
💯42.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 175reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 12 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dr_vaspol. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 19:49 UTC173 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Решил отвлечься от темы отпуска) пока вернусь к проф контенту) ❓📖 Как я выбирал учёбу раньше — и как выбираю сейчас Раньше я ездил туда, куда соглашались отправить или куда «проплачивали» медпреды. Сейчас сначала определяю, какой конкретно навык мне нужен или на какой вопрос я хочу получить ответ. И уже под него выбираю конференцию, курс или стажировку. Кстати, по моим наблюдениям, курсанты, которые приезжают учи

🔥93

23 Jul 2026, 17:14 UTC252 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Автопутешествие. Часть 2. Границы Самый частый вопрос, который мне задавали перед поездкой: «Ну что там на Верхнем Ларсе?» Перед дорогой мы постоянно мониторили Telegram-канал Travel Ask. Там практически в режиме реального времени люди пишут, что происходит на границе. Очень рекомендую пользоваться. И, если проехали сами, не поленитесь оставить сообщение — именно благодаря таким отчетам канал остается полезным. М

🔥73👍2

22 Jul 2026, 07:58 UTC248 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, простым большинством, вы все же разрешили мне ненадолго побыть тревел-блогером 🙂 Но с поправкой на профессию. Вместо рассказов про красивые виды и «атмосферу» хочу оставить здесь максимально практичные заметки, которые могут пригодиться тем, кто тоже решит отправиться в подобное путешествие. Исходные данные: * автомобиль — Ford Kuga, 2018 года, пробег 222 000 км; * старший сын (13 лет) уехал в лагерь BC в

🔥146👍3💯1

16 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC332 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎂🥳🎁🎁Сегодня у меня день рождения Последние полторы недели я ничего не публиковал. Впервые за долгое время решил провести нормальный отпуск: не работать параллельно и не контролировать всё вокруг, а отдать внимание семье и себе. Эта пауза стала для меня чертой после тяжёлого и напряжённого периода. 🎁Сегодня у меня день рождения. И это хороший повод зафиксировать, куда я хочу двигаться дальше как врач, преподавател

🔥2012💯3

10 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC366 views17 reactions15 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

"Коксартроз и гиалуронка: почему «на игле» работает, а в РКИ — нет" Новый формат зашёл нормально) Спасибо за комментарии и реакции. Иду той же дорогой. Непросто))) В проф. тусовке слышу: «Гиалуронка в тазобедренный — ерунда. Хватит колоть, давай сразу на протез». НО, блин! «на земле» всё выглядит немного иначе. Под УЗИ колем ТБС, вводим препарат. Пациент встаёт: «Доктор, а так можно было??!!». Облегчение «на и

9🔥5👍3

6 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC338 views26 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тендинопатии: докмед vs кабинета врача «на земле» Меняю тон канала) Но, конечно, оставлю свой стиль))) 4 дня на этот пост. Молчал не просто так) Я - успешный обладатель ряда тендинопатий, и сам все успешно полечил) Нас, "кольщиков" и "физиоволшебников", часто прессуют сторонники EBM (докмед) за применение методик с низкой эффективностью. В исследованиях - все довольно просто, а вот "на земле" - все немного иначе

👍176🔥3

1 Jul 2026, 11:01 UTC375 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Побывал там, где заново начал жить» На прошлый пост - продолжение написал в комментах. Эти 3 дня мы с Василисой провели в Калининградской области. Ранее я писал, что именно отсюда начал свою трансформацию от вредных привычек и прочих бед. Странно, но думал, каково это будет оказаться здесь снова? Видимо с возрастом усиливается «ностальгичность» что ли?) Здесь, в Зеленоградске, я первый раз пробежал 2,5 потом 3 и

🔥126👍2

29 Jun 2026, 15:37 UTC321 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Коллеги, вопрос по пациенту» На этом скрине МРТ травма четырехглавой мышцы от марта 2026 года. Пациент возрастной, коморбидный. Есть задумка как его полечить, но, я бы ее изложил после серии ваших комментариев. Буду очень признателен за варианты

27 Jun 2026, 08:11 UTC343 views15 reactions10 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Что, когда и куда колоть?» Работая со стажерами понял, что этот вопрос требует создания отдельной методички. Тем более, что единый подход есть, разве что, к инъекциям гиалуроновой кислоты. Сегодня у нас есть большой выбор препаратов для ЛИТ. Это и хорошо и плохо одновременно. Для меня решение о выборе препарата принимается на основании понимания следующих вещей (в порядке убывающей важности): ⏺ тканевой структурой

👍132

26 Jun 2026, 05:29 UTC346 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Добрый день! Я невролог Локтаева Инна, лечу головную боль, тревожные и депрессивные расстройства, различные хронические болевые синдромы, головокружение и эпилепсию. Веду с коллегой детским неврологом канал о детской и взрослой неврологии: https://t.me/neurologistsq Сейчас я расскажу о медикаментозной терапии хронической неспецифической боли в нижней части спины. Напомню, что хроническая боль — это боль, которая дл

🔥74

26 Jun 2026, 05:29 UTC269 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, спасибо за обсуждение! Вот алгоритм, который по данному кейсу пойду я!) Буду держать в курсе) А ниже размещу пост моей коллеги - классного невролога, которая органично расскажет нам о правильном подходе к медикаментозной терапии боли в нижней спине) Всем отличного дня и приятного чтение полезной информации!)

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @dr_vaspol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 780,712 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Травматолог Полывянный | Обучение врачей” (@dr_vaspol), 443 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dr_vaspol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.