Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Don’t give papaya

Channel

Don’t give papaya

@dontgivepapaya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,507subscribers

+283 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001116161981
TypeChannel
Username@dontgivepapaya
DescriptionКругосветный вояж закончен, но истории все не кончаются… @breadishead / twitter.com/Vovan4Vovan
Created25 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dontgivepapaya

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,1547,5567,3556 August 2026 — 7,224 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,224 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,210 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,200 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,186 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,181 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,177 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,170 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,164 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,161 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,156 subscribers6 September 2026 — 7,154 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,251 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,256 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,251 subscribers30 September 2026 — 7,249 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,238 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,234 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,225 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,201 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,523 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,544 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,552 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,556 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,526 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,513 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,507 subscribers7,5076 August 20267 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net +283. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,094–7,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:567,507-6
4 Nov 2026, 15:497,513-13
2 Nov 2026, 01:417,526-30
30 Oct 2026, 10:057,556+4
27 Oct 2026, 20:377,552+8
25 Oct 2026, 05:507,544+21
21 Oct 2026, 23:317,523+322
19 Oct 2026, 00:387,201-24
16 Oct 2026, 09:277,225-9
12 Oct 2026, 22:467,234-4
6 Oct 2026, 19:207,238-11
30 Sept 2026, 03:017,249-2
19 Sept 2026, 13:417,251-5
15 Sept 2026, 03:017,256+5
11 Sept 2026, 04:597,251+97
6 Sept 2026, 06:387,154-2
1 Sept 2026, 23:547,156-5
30 Aug 2026, 09:377,161-3
27 Aug 2026, 10:167,164-6
24 Aug 2026, 03:127,170first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
61.7%
avg views ÷ 7,507 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,640
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held40 (16 May 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total41,720
Reactions total1,430
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 12:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
483
Videos
71
Links
99

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
31s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,489 reactions across 40 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4,19944.3%
❤2,84029.9%
🔥1,82019.2%
🌚2923.08%
💔2322.44%
💊680.717%
💩380.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,489 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 40 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dontgivepapaya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 May 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 16:07 UTC≈2,060 views66 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

У меня была бабка. Она готовила плов. И работала сторожем в гаражном кооперативе. Её плов был отличный. И карьера в порядке (в гараже все ходили по струнке). А вот советы по жизни она давала не очень. Главным образом она повторяла, качая седой головой — «а что люди скажут!?». Восклицательный знак прошу читать вслух и фальцетом. Была она советской формации, и чужое мнение влекло ее чрезвычайно. У Володи кол по поведе…

❤44🔥15💩5🌚2

31 Oct 2026, 14:09 UTC≈2,930 views112 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video

Спот, где мы серфим, называется jail breaks Потому что спот, где мы серфим, — у стен мальдивской тюрьмы. Вот такая диалектика свободы (если бы с нами серфил Гегель).

🔥61❤27🤣15💔6🌚3

27 Oct 2026, 17:20 UTC≈4,220 views146 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Продолжаю читать бердяева Бердяев в прошлом веке предсказал инфоцыган. “... очень характерно для русского народа появление самозванных царей из народа и пророков-исцелителей; самозванство — чисто русское явление. Пугачев мог преуспеть только выдав себя за Петра III, а протопоп Аввакум верил в свое избранничество” Т.е. в крепостной России интернета еще не было... а инфоцыгане уже имелись. Читаю Бердяева дальше... и…

❤74🔥49🤣22🌚1

22 Oct 2026, 16:51 UTC≈8,950 views270 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Интернет всю неделю меня пытается убедить, что "Франция ВСЁ". Но интернет не знает, что утром я читал Бердяева. В книге "русская идея" он пишет, неожиданно, про русскую идею, и как ей не повезло взять в команду православие, а не протестантизм. Но самое интересное на 174 странице, где он цитирует интернет повестку славянофилов 1850х.. а они там ожидают загнивания Европы, повторяя "Европа ВСЁ". Получается, почти 200 л…

❤139🔥62🤣42🌚17💊5💔5

18 Oct 2026, 14:11 UTC≈6,020 views237 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Мне сказали, что это магия пьяного тела И тут я вспомнил вот что... Мы как-то с другом летали на Ибицу. И трезвыми были только пару часов по приезде (неделю пребывали в мрачно-озорной кондиции). И как-то шли по набережной, солнце село, набережная опустела, только пара убитых вхлам бритосов и какой-то чел, певший под гитару цоя. Еще у пирса соблазнительно качались яхты, как NPC яхты в GTA, которые можно угнать; Мы в…

🤣156❤41🔥31💊6💔3

18 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC≈3,850 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Тем временем — тут есть литература, новая информация и масоны (завод по производству теорий заговора).

🤣21❤6🔥6🌚1

17 Oct 2026, 17:36 UTC≈3,940 views82 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Тургенев, к слову, был масоном

🌚45🤣22🔥12❤3

16 Oct 2026, 16:31 UTC≈4,570 views227 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Как меня наебал ИИ С некоторых пор Клод мне как брат. Пилим, что попало, гешефт имеем. (кроме текстов, клод не читал так яростно набокова и фицджеральда, не подчеркивал по ночам панчи бродского, платонова и берроуза... но это я отвлекся) Клод сделал мне игру "рязань-95" (играешь за гопника в 3 локациях: падик, лавка, парк; перелом сюжета -- смолток или бита, удар с вертушки или выпить, супер комбо -- нарядить сопер…

🤣192❤21💔11🔥3

10 Oct 2026, 16:14 UTC≈5,180 views256 reactionsread 7 November 2026

По карте звездного неба сегодня история про чиновников. Она комична, однако может ранить, прошу удалить от экранов детей. Профессор Хомский (ему 90 и он преподает в MIT) писал, что мы живем ради созидания. Покупаем бессмертие, делая бизнес, детей, книгу, фильм и даже хуевое граффити на гаражном кооперативе "Озерки" в Рязани. И за 70.000 лет прошли жизнь на уровне ультрахард — от камня до айфона. Но и в этом процессе…

🤣175🔥36❤24💔15💩5💊1

8 Oct 2026, 12:02 UTC≈4,680 views122 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Скроллил вчера нетфликс до панической атаки. Сотни однотипных фильмов и сериалов. В целом как профили в тиндере, разве что фильмы с экрана не пытаются разводить тебя на инвестиции в крипту. При этом Нетфликс потратили за год 10 млрд на контент. У них, конечно, бывают выстрелы и эякулят успеха, но глобально я не понимаю, что там делают сценаристы на 10 млрд долларов сша. Могли бы просто читать канал Печатные выражения…

🔥58🤣39❤20🌚5

2 Oct 2026, 16:43 UTC≈4,800 views164 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

У Ноя Харари есть книга — Нексус У Генри Миллера есть книга — Нексус Такие одинаковые названия... и такие разные судьбы... Харари жует сопли и ноет о том, там нам в будущем будет не сладко, в общем, НАБИЛ ОСКОМИНУ алармизмом. Миллер выдает порцию маргинальной эстетики блядского парижского андеграунда. Это я к чему… если бы у нас был книжный клуб, мы бы читали Миллера, но не Харари...

❤90🔥46🤣22🌚6

1 Oct 2026, 17:11 UTC≈5,230 views183 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В прошлом посте Хармс умер, но в этом он еще поживет. Мне кажется довольно трогательным и охуительным тот факт, что Хармс делил писателей/художников на 3 категории: огненные, водяные и огненно-водяные. Так что если хотите элегантно понтануться, то начинайте с этого... Из дневника: 1926 -- 1927 г.г. Хотим предложить разделить все произведения искусства на два лагеря: Огненный и Водяной. Поясняем примерами: если прой…

🔥90🤣62❤29🌚2

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @dontgivepapaya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Don’t give papaya” (@dontgivepapaya), 7,507 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dontgivepapaya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.