Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +494. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,340–11,035 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:58
10,914
-10
16 Sept 2026, 11:00
10,924
-31
14 Sept 2026, 14:21
10,955
+18
12 Sept 2026, 21:43
10,937
+76
11 Sept 2026, 01:37
10,861
+194
8 Sept 2026, 00:58
10,667
-13
4 Sept 2026, 21:41
10,680
+11
3 Sept 2026, 09:27
10,669
+6
2 Sept 2026, 06:22
10,663
+98
1 Sept 2026, 06:55
10,565
-14
31 Aug 2026, 05:25
10,579
+1
29 Aug 2026, 03:47
10,578
+1
28 Aug 2026, 02:04
10,577
+2
27 Aug 2026, 00:54
10,575
+20
26 Aug 2026, 02:24
10,555
-16
24 Aug 2026, 23:12
10,571
-16
23 Aug 2026, 06:47
10,587
-2
21 Aug 2026, 20:35
10,589
+25
20 Aug 2026, 16:38
10,564
-3
19 Aug 2026, 18:22
10,567
first reading
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 10,914 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
16.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
40 (24 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
4,660
Reactions total
773
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 18s
Average length
1m 09s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
9,751 reactions across 39 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5467672081397208382
2,287
23.5%
🤣
2,196
22.5%
custom 5222311371554700374
944
9.68%
😁
846
8.68%
❤
805
8.26%
custom 5226876646912461189
707
7.25%
custom 5240262200253242044
569
5.84%
🦄
389
3.99%
💔
303
3.11%
🍓
287
2.94%
❤🔥
166
1.70%
custom 5456587969102103091
136
1.39%
😢
62
0.636%
💋
54
0.554%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,862 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 40 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @anxiousgirlie. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 40 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
2.50%
1 of 40 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,650
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,370
over 39 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqwh18H8
1
7 August 2026
7 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
В эфире модная рубрика в чём я пошла в пятёрочку.
Как вы понимаете, в пятёрочку я снова не пошла. Зато мы с Дмитрием отправились на свидание в парк аттракционов.
Вообще, у нас семейная традиция — минимум раз за лето получать свои порции адреналинов /действительно, в жизни же их так мало хех/ на экстремальных покатушках, которые я обожаю. Но вчера... ВЧЕРА Я ПОСЕДЕЛА.
Сидим, значит, в вагончике американской горки, …
А вы знали, что тревожники опередили всех по уровню сексуальной активности?
Вот и я не знала.
Пока не прочитала пост Лены Галецкой. Оказывается, сексологи выяснили, что у тревожников секса больше, потому что через интимную близость мы понимаем, что партнёр нас не разлюбил и мы ему нужны, муа-ха-ха. А если, допустим, сексов долго /по нашим критериям/ нет, то напрягаемся, дескать, ОХЛАДЕЛ. Снова о своих куртизанках д…
В чём я переобулась за последние десять лет.
Часть вторая.
Вы поставили аж триста Бонь под предыдущим постом, значит, продолжаем тему ментальных переобуваний.
1. Лет эдак до двадцати двух считала себя прожжёным экстравертом. Люди, люди, где толпа — там и я. Долбаный Дэдпул. Провести выходной дома? В ОДИНОЧЕСТВЕ? Смерти подобно. Сейчас, конечно, понимаю, что то был всего-навсего прогрессирующий алкоголизм, а на сам…
Сырки с чувствительной кожей, приготовьесь! Я принесла сокровище.
Зелье молодости, магний для реактивной кожи: сыворотка и крем с азиатской центеллой от бренда Mezonica.
Всем известно, что я атопик с реактивной кожей, к тому же склонной к акне. Поэтому в моей косметичке обязательно присутствуют:
а) средства с кислотами и ретинолом
б) что-нибудь восстанавливающее кожный барьер после их воздействия.
Так что, когда …
Ленин сдох. Разложился на плесень и липовый мёд уксус.
И это, кстати, вполне ожидаемо. Грибу не повезло. Он попал в руки человека, который не может воткнуть нитку в иголку. Человека, который оторвал себе ноготь, пытаясь открыть квашеную капусту. Человека, который умудрился сварить щи с личинками. Ииииии просто — ну — забыл про существование гриба.
Эх. Прощай, милый Ленин. Прощайте, мечты о комбуче собственного прои…
Любимая рубрика: нам пишут.
Алкоголизм лучше, чем ибупрофен? Алкоголизм эффективнее антибиотиков во время чумы? Может, алкоголизмом можно вылечить понос????
Логика железная, как трухлявый пень.
Забавно, что эти голоса не утихают примерно ни-ко-гда!!! Неважно — пост ли это в канале или вечеринка с друзьями.
Рассказала, как после ссоры Дмитрием прошла сто тыщ шагов, рыдая под айс бейби? Конечно, все именно за этим здесь и собрались. Ляпнула про очередную выходку родителей? Ну прекрасно! Ещё дырку на трусах покажи. Поделилась историей о том, как упала в кучу навоза, испугавшись сомбаки размером с морковь? Чёт…
В рубрике #тревожныенаходки у нас небесное сокровище, мои беспокойные друзья. Чёрный бархат, таблетка атаракса — АНТИТРЕВОЖНЫЙ БЛОКНОТ В ТЕМАТИКЕ РУССКИХ СКАЗОК.
Да, вы не ослышались.
Спасибо читательнице Маше, которая работает в издательстве и решила отправить мне это чудо. Маша, привет!
Наверняка вы, как, впрочем, и я, нечто подобное уже встречали. Правда, обычно это всяческие учебники по, господи прости, самора…
В чём я переобулась за последние десять лет.
В пурпурной соцсети вирусится такой тренд, а мы чем, спрашивается, хуже?
На самом деле после текста про возрастные кризисы я поняла, что с девятнадцати лет хренова туча моих убеждений переменилась.
Итак, рассказываю.
1. Саморазрушение — это круто. Помню, сказала первому работодателю, что планирую спиться и сдохнуть на помойке, мне больше в жизни ничего и не надо. Тогда…
Наткнулась на статью про возрастные кризисы и вспомнила как переживала кризис четверти жизни.
Ёпсель мопсель, это, наверное, самый жёсткий за всю мою — пока ещё не очень долгую — жизнь. Да ещё и перенесённый на трезвую!!!!!!
Всё тогда навалилось. Долго не могла справиться с утратой бабушки, эсэмэмная работа разонравилась, плюс с Дмитрием проходили через тяжёлый период. Тоже, кажется, кризис трёх лет.
Короче, перес…
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @anxiousgirlie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@anxiousgirlie edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“тревожная подружка” (@anxiousgirlie), 10,914 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anxiousgirlie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
