Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Гнев и ярость в близких отношениях

@dom_viol

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

582subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001309636860
TypeChannel
Username@dom_viol
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dom_viol

Growth

582583582.57 Aug 2026, 15:37 — 583 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:20 — 583 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 09:53 — 582 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 15:378 Aug 2026, 09:53
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 582–583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 09:53582-1
8 Aug 2026, 03:20583no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:37583first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 28 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.02%
avg views ÷ 582 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held16 (28 March 20267 August 2026)
Views total105
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 30s
Average length
1m 30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7446.5%
🔥4327.0%
👍1811.3%
❤‍🔥1710.7%
😢42.52%
😍21.26%
👏10.629%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @within4wallsPhoto

Стыд, вина и насилие: что с этим делать Насилие редко начинается с удара. Задолго до него появляются: мучительное чувство унижения, страх оказаться ничтожным, невыносимая уязвимость, невозможность выдержать собственную боль. Порой именно там, где человек больше всего боится встретиться с собой, рождается потребность контролировать другого. На конференции «Колыбель Ехидны» мы будем говорить о том, что предшествует

🔥21

Signed Victoria Plesser

2 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC73 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @within4wallsPhoto

Практическая онлайн-конференция «Колыбель Ехидны»: мастер-классы по работе с насилием Зимой нам удалось выбраться из объятий Тифона с помощью насыщенной беседы о феномене насилия и планах действий при встречах с его разрушительной силой. Теперь мы хотим вместе с вами поразмышлять над истоками насильственного поведения. Присоединяйтесь🩵 23 августа с 11:00 до 18:00 проведем шесть двухчасовых мастер-классов для специа

👍3🔥3

Signed Victoria Plesser

12 Jul 2026, 12:15 UTC162 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lorcerpsy

Почему люди, пережившие травму, так сильно в себе сомневаются… Часть 2. Автор healing.the.mosaic (IG)* Перевод Anne Green Moon 1 часть Газлайтинг меняет то, как люди мыслят. Когда кто-то проводит долгие годы в окружении тех, кто ими манипулирует или постоянно говорит, что их восприятие реальности неправильное, это начинает менять то, как этот человек себя воспринимает. Спустя какое-то время люди, пережившие травму

❤‍🔥5👍1

Signed Victoria Plesser

3 Jul 2026, 09:32 UTC190 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @emdr_schoolPhoto

Так создается травма 💔

9

Signed Victoria Plesser

26 Jun 2026, 08:19 UTC247 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @WomensConsortiumPhoto

Как пытки связаны с домашним насилием? 26 июня — Международный день в поддержку жертв пыток. Россия, как и еще 173 страны, поддерживает Конвенцию против пыток и других жестоких видов обращения и наказания (вступила в силу в 1987 году). По этому поводу рассказываем, как бесчеловечные или унижающие достоинство действия связаны с домашним насилием. Пытками считается умышленное причинение сильной физической или психоло

❤‍🔥4🔥32👍1

Signed Victoria Plesser

25 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC183 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Lorcerpsy

Травматичный опыт в детстве не просто остается в памяти – он буквально оставляет след в теле Свежее исследование ученых из UCLA показало, как именно "тело помнит все" – на уровне клеточного метаболизма. Авторы взяли взрослых с историей детских травм и измерили работу митохондрий напрямую - не просто опросники, а реальный "стресс-тест" живых клеток. митохондрии – это маленькие "энергостанции" внутри клеток. Они п

🔥11😢4

Signed Victoria Plesser

19 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTC204 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Приглашаю на ежемесячную открытую супервизию! Виктория Плессер — клинический психолог, индивидуальный и парный терапевт в доказательных подходах (EFT, DBT, TFP, EMDR), супервизор, специалист по работе с психологической травмой и агрессивным/насильственным поведением, член Ассоциации психиатров и психологов за научно-обоснованную практику, экс-председатель Ассоциации консультантов «Соль», член WWP-EN, консультант цен

🔥5👍21

Signed Victoria Plesser

12 Jun 2026, 15:21 UTC217 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @faust21century

Исследование продемонстрировало: это один из механизмов межпоколенческой трансляции данной практики. Разумеется, это не означает, что АБСОЛЮТНО ВСЕ родители, пережившие физические наказания, воспроизведут подобную модель поведения. Гершофф подчёркивает: эмоциональная экспрессия, интонация и слова воспитателя сами по себе обладают достаточной силой для передачи серьёзности ситуации. Фраза, обращённая к ребёнку: «Есл

10❤‍🔥6

Signed Victoria Plesser

12 Jun 2026, 15:20 UTC205 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @faust21century

Физические наказания наносят детям вред, не корректируя их поведение. Масштабный метаанализ, охвативший 75 научных работ и данные о 160 927 детях, зафиксировал 13 измеримых негативных эффектов при полном отсутствии доказательств позитивных изменений в поведении. Учёные не видят принципиальной разницы между физическим наказанием и физическим насилием.Сравнительный анализ обеих групп показал идентичный уровень причин

7❤‍🔥2👏1

Signed Victoria Plesser

2 Jun 2026, 07:58 UTC245 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @tebepoveriatVideo

Елизавета Боярская, Анна Михалкова, Любовь Аксёнова, Юлия Снигирь, Максим Матвеев, Александр Петров, Данила Козловский и Александра Бортич озвучили реальные фразы, которые дети слышат, когда решаются рассказать о том, что их беспокоит, и показали, какие слова помогают сохранить доверие. Кампания #страшноважно — о том, как важна поддержка в момент, когда ребёнок рассказывает о пережитом сексуализированном насилии. М

12👍5

Signed Victoria Plesser

24 May 2026, 09:36 UTC333 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Совместная супервизия психиатра Антона Елисеенко и клинического психолога Виктории Плессер. После двух тёплых и глубоких открытых встреч запускаем регулярную группу. Раз в две недели по понедельникам 18:00–19:30 25.05 · 08.06 · 22.06 и далее Формат совместной супервизии позволяет рассматривать сложные случаи одновременно с психиатрической и клинико-психологической стороны — видеть и симптом, и контекст, и динамику

9🔥5

Signed Victoria Plesser

29 Apr 2026, 19:19 UTC445 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Здравствуйте, уважаемые коллеги! Приглашаем вас на совместную супервизию психиатра Елисеенко Антона и клинического психолога Виктории Плессер 4 мая с 18.00 до 19.30 по мск, встреча в зум. Бережное и профессиональное пространство для разбора сложных клинических случаев с двух сторон: психиатрической и психологической. Мы помогаем увидеть целостную картину состояния клиента: диагностику, медикаментозные вопросы, осо

10🔥3😍1

Signed Victoria Plesser

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dom_viol. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 971,087 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Гнев и ярость в близких отношениях” (@dom_viol), 582 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dom_viol.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.