Channel
@docnazarova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,201subscribers
-17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001460978269 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @docnazarova |
| Created | 25 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/docnazarova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:27 | 9,201 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 9,216 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 9,218 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 9,218 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (8 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 12,061 |
| Reactions total | 258 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
389 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 220 | 56.6% | |
| 🔥 | 100 | 25.7% | |
| 👍 | 52 | 13.4% | |
| 👀 | 11 | 2.83% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.771% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.771% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 389reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
❓Что может нарушить естественный цикл обновления волос и заставить их выпадать раньше срока? Основные провокаторы выпадения: 1. Гормональный фон и наследственность. Это одна из самых частых причин. Повышенная чувствительность фолликулов к андрогенам заложена генетически. У женщин это обычно проявляется истончением по центральному пробору и на макушке. Сюда же — скачки гормонов после родов, в период лактации или в ме…
❤13
А вы ездите отдыхать без детей?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Выходные пролетели как одно мгновение, была в Санкт Петербурге❤️ Решили с мужем устроить романтичные 2-х дневные каникулы, мы редко куда-то ездим без детей! Питер прекрасный город, очень люблю ❤️
🔥21❤6👍6
Очень интересный случай на приеме, тайну которого раскрыло углубленное аллергологическое обследование. Молодой мужчина с 24 лет отмечал риноконъюнктивит, кашель и затрудненное дыхание при контакте с собаками (при этом дома жила собака). Аллерголог диагностировал бронхиальную астму и назначил базисную ингаляционную терапию. В 2024 году собака умерла — симптомы значительно уменьшились, затем полностью ушли, и ингалято…
❤29🔥13👀11👍7👏3
Как же прекрасно летом! Особенно на даче, с нашими чудесными зверюшками❤️ Сегодня пост как раз про зверюшек, точнее про аллергию на них.
❤17👍4
Давно не была в Парке Горького. Как здесь все изменилось, очень красиво сделали набережную, но народу много, даже в будние дни.
❤12
Как у вас проходит лето?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤4
Завидую тем, кто выходит из отпуска плавно, это совсем не про меня😅
❤8
Здесь не просто жарко (+37) - здесь влажность зашкаливает (80-90%), и кожа работает в экстремальном режиме: сальные и потовые железы активны на максимуме. У меня еще и очень активно-спортивный отдых. Именно в таких условиях особенно остро встаёт вопрос выбора текстуры SPF. Плотный крем в этом климате - это дискомфорт и риск забитых пор, угревых высыпаний. А отказываться от защиты нельзя, обгоришь сразу. На фото я час…
❤23
Я сейчас в Яншо, и здесь жуткая жара — +37 °C. Солнце очень жаркое, поэтому солнцезащитный крем у меня льётся рекой. Но, слава богу, иногда бывает дождь. Самое сложное — защищать лицо от солнца: нужна хорошая защита, но при этом не должно быть жирности, дискомфорта и прыщиков из‑за крема в условиях сильной жары и влажности.
🔥17❤8
Я сейчас в Яншо, это деревня среди гор, вдали от крупных городов, я с детьми в составе китайского лагеря моего сына, поэтому к сбору аптечки в этот раз я подошла оооочень серьезно. Вот пример моей аптечки ➡️, ваша должна быть адаптирована под ваши особенности здоровья. К сожалению, риск развития острой аллергической реакции в отпуске выше, т.к мы не всегда можем контролировать, где и с каким аллергеном можем столкн…
👍25❤16
После посещения рынка, мы поняли, что в Китае едят все…. Что-то адекватное мы конечно пробовали, но совсем изврат типо саранчи, голубя, черепахи и прочего нет… Очень много экзотических фруктов и сладостей, попробовать хочется все) Все стоит очень дешево! А еще очень много милых, общительных зверюшек и противных насекомых. Вообще куча аллергенов вокруг. Поэтому у меня огромная аптечка в поездку и еще дорожная всегда…
❤15
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @docnazarova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы ездите отдыхать без детей?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как у вас проходит лето?
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Были в Яншо?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 98,219 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Doc.nazarova” (@docnazarova), 9,201 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/docnazarova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.