4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,607–6,657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 13:47
6,613
-27
11 Aug 2026, 13:16
6,640
-11
8 Aug 2026, 07:51
6,651
no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:01
6,651
first reading
Engagement
9 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.0%
avg views ÷ 6,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,720
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 9 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
9 (16 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
13,767
Reactions total
381
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 02:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
11m 59s
Average length
2m 00s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
492 reactions across 9 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
321
65.2%
🔥
55
11.2%
❤🔥
46
9.35%
💔
16
3.25%
😁
16
3.25%
custom 5413813719786333463
12
2.44%
💅
12
2.44%
👍
6
1.22%
💯
5
1.02%
custom 5411441407485288387
3
0.61%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 492reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Всем хай!
Совсем пропадаю из соцсетей:(
Признаться честно переживаю небольшой профессиональный кризис. Или не небольшой, не знаю.
В последнее время все кажется бессмысленным, бесполезным и пустым.
Пока не понимаю как можно справиться с ситуацией, как пересмотреть свои взгляды и отбросить тревожные мысли.
Где то в глубине чувствую ноющий неприятный осадок, будто все что я делаю какой-то дурацкий второстепенный шум.…
Вы не знали, что аллергию можно вылечить? Оказывается, можно! 🧡
Мы совместно с нашими друзьями из клиники «Два сердца» разобрали вопрос аллергии на домашних животных и спешим поделиться.
Лучший способ: прийти на приём к аллергологу и начать лечить аллергию вместе с врачом.
Записаться на приём к аллергологу можно через наших администраторов @w_deti
Давно так кайфово не тренил!
Метод кнута и пряника у моей кисы отрабатывает на 200%.
Кнут я вам показал, а вот пряник ток за деньги))))
(шучу, после трени расслабили мышцы кальяном ахаха)
В следующее воскресенье будет треня с Деном. Я уже виду какой это будет угар.
Если с Машей мы милашничаем, то с Деном у нас больная любовь 😆
Оскорбления, хамство и токсичность, нас все устраивает)
Не реклама, для своих только сам…
Кстати, решил дать еще один шанс зернам из Эфиопии. Не люблю кислые ноты, вот и все.
+ Низкий поклон сотрудникам кофейни Культура общения на Чкаловской, которые любезно помололи мои зерна абсолютно бесплатно.
Сегодня день, когда я позволил себе сказать: «Мир может подождать меня до понедельника!»
Никакого нетворкинга, телефон на беззвучный, а самое главное, никакого даже намека на решение рабочих вопросов до будних.
Ну так, всего лишь один ответ по рабочему моменту)
Как же хорошо остаться с самим собой, емае. Никаких клацаний по клавиатуре, брейн штормов и чей-то речи в моих ушах.
Сегодня сходил в зал, затарился в супе…
Уважаемые подписчики! недавно я выиграла в конкурсе у крутого аллерголога (его тг канал: https://t.me/onlyallergeekfans, ссылка на клинику, где он принимает есть в канале). представляю вам ОбЗоР рАсПоКоВкУ моего подарка!! набор реально крутой
спасибо за такую возможность 🫶
Друзья!
Я и прекрасные врачи моего отделения подготовили блок лекций (3 штуки) для врачей работающих с беременными!
Решили поднять эту тему так как вопрос ведения беременных всегда очень сложный и вызывает очень много страхов!
Мы разберем:
- Что делать если у беременной любая форма аллергии?
- Как обследовать и как лечить?
- Когда лечить самому и когда отправить к специалисту?
- Что делать если у женщины аллергия н…
Ваш доктор жив!
Но он еле дышит!
Ближайшую неделю постараюсь подавать признаки жизни!
Но если меня нет долго, значит меня придавило коробками!
❤73😁16💅12custom 54138137197863334637❤🔥3
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @onlyallergeekfans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 261,609 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Declared links
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Only.Allergeek.Fans” (@onlyallergeekfans), 6,613 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onlyallergeekfans.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.