2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 705–707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 02:18
706
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:58
706
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 13 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
213
Videos
9
Links
72
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
93 reactions across 13 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
21
22.6%
😁
14
15.1%
👍
13
14.0%
🤣
13
14.0%
🔥
12
12.9%
❤
9
9.68%
❤🔥
6
6.45%
💩
4
4.30%
🤔
1
1.08%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 8 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😂 На Pumpfun устроили странную bounty-акцию — пообещали 40 SOL тому, кто набьёт на лбу название токена BOUNTYWORK и снимет процесс на видео.
Парень из Индии реально пошёл в тату-салон, но мастер ошибся в одной букве и вместо $BOUNTYWORK набил $BOUTYWORK — формально задание уже не подходило под условия.
Зато комьюнити превратило фейл в новый шиток BOUTYWORK, направило комиссии этому парню, и в итоге он уже вывел поч…
⏳ 1 июня в 23:59 убираю скидки. Цены возвращаются к обычным.
Таких НИЗКИХ цен больше никогда не будет
Кто планировал взять или продлить подписку - забирайте сейчас на максимальных условиях:
🟢 -20% на абсолютно все тарифы
🎁 +1 месяц бонусом для первых 20 покупателей (часть мест уже забрали).
Инструменты для работы:
🛸 @wormscoutbot — автоматический поиск NDA-сетей, нативных и редких мостов для кроссчейн-арбитража.
…
🔥Всем салют, хочу вам рассказать про команду энтузиастов, строющих лучшее комьюнити по трейдингу
👀Один из создателей - @otchetnikForbes
Трейдер с 5-и летнем опытом в этой сфере и работе в крупных проектах, решил с командой открыть нестандартный канал по трейдингу и крипте.
В индустрии они с 2021 года, однако ребята уходили из медийки в тень чтобы прокачать свой скилл на максимум: гоняли гипотезы через бектесты, отт…
😎Кста @wormscoutbot с которого можно было очень вкусно выносить два месяца пробыл фри( довольно долго) уже платный, подписка отбивается на год вперёд с первого же вкусного выноса.
Подобного продукта на рынке нет
ЛУЧШИЙ поиск мостов любого токена (в том числе и нативных)
ЛУЧШИЙ поиск ВСЕХ сетей токена (даже на листинге)
Я не буду его сильно рекламить чтобы не шиллить, мне достаточно того, что топы им пользуются. Мо…
Единственный проект на рынке, который ищет нативные мосты токенов, по мимо всех НДА сетей как было с выносом на usr
Закрываю доступ через 3 дня, ибо слишком полезно для доступа всем + лимиты часто ложаться
@wormscoutbot
Literally ворк с @pushoverprice_bot
(Кстати заливайтесь)
🤡3💩1😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @dnevnikcryptona. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 871,746 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@dnevnikcryptona named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@nofomore_trading_lab named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Криптомонах” (@dnevnikcryptona), 706 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnevnikcryptona.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
