Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for рума розена

Channel

рума розена

@rozenroom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,235subscribers

+254 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001872089387
TypeChannel
Username@rozenroom
Descriptionартем, 26 люблю большие числа, путешествия и картошку фри. деловые вопросы - @rozencrypto
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/rozenroom

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,9567,2627,1096 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,980 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,975 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,978 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,981 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,976 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,970 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,976 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,956 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,969 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,023 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,043 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,035 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,020 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,013 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,133 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,121 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,110 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,259 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,254 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,262 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,248 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,252 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,250 subscribers10 November 2026 — 7,235 subscribers7,2356 August 202610 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 96 days, net +254. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,910–7,308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 10:417,235-15
6 Nov 2026, 16:497,250-2
3 Nov 2026, 07:087,252+4
31 Oct 2026, 04:207,248-14
28 Oct 2026, 03:377,262+8
24 Oct 2026, 21:217,254-5
22 Oct 2026, 04:517,259+149
18 Oct 2026, 16:457,110-11
15 Oct 2026, 14:197,121-12
12 Oct 2026, 12:557,133+120
5 Oct 2026, 14:177,013-7
27 Sept 2026, 15:207,020-15
17 Sept 2026, 23:557,035-8
10 Sept 2026, 13:217,043+20
5 Sept 2026, 04:417,023+54
1 Sept 2026, 03:396,969+13
28 Aug 2026, 22:256,956-20
25 Aug 2026, 13:356,976+6
22 Aug 2026, 23:186,970-6
19 Aug 2026, 10:126,976first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.1%
avg views ÷ 7,235 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,410
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held42 (20 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total64,700
Reactions total810
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
701
Videos
49
Links
264

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 49s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,619 reactions across 41 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁96159.4%
👍38123.5%
custom 52697691066131009511438.83%
🌭714.39%
🤩633.89%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,619 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37,104
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 41 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
37,000
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @rozenroom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 22:08 UTC≈1,310 views45 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Парни самый рофл в чем, он выложил пост что грам дал +7%, после поста курс пампанули на 1%, он отредачил на 8%, потом курс вырос еще, он отредачил на 9, и так до 11 дошел. Не, вот Дуров и Илон это просто два гигатролля, я восхищаюсь.

😁39🤩4custom 52697691066131009512

10 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC≈1,560 views16 reactionsread 11 November 2026

ХАХАХАХАХАХХА Я УМЕР

😁15custom 52697691066131009511

10 Nov 2026, 21:48 UTC≈1,090 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🔴 Crypto’s a sea of red. 🟢 Only Gram is up: +9%. 🌐 I'm not surprised. It’s the only coin built into a real social ecosystem. 💎 Still ridiculously undervalued — it belongs in CMC’s top 3. One day it’ll get there.

😁19custom 52697691066131009511

10 Nov 2026, 13:17 UTC≈2,240 views51 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Вайб вывести все деньги из криптовалюты, накупить золота и заняться чем-то другим. Скоро паранойя будет из-за такого количества взломов и уязвимостей. Я думаю медвежка 2027 может начаться как раз таки из-за такого новостного фона. Уязвимость нулевого дня, ai эксплойты, взломы DeFi проектов, CEX. Уже сейчас нагнали страх во время выбора обновиться или нет? Вдруг обновлюсь до новой версии OS/Приложения, а оно с дырами…

👍40🤩8custom 52697691066131009512🌭1

8 Nov 2026, 17:46 UTC≈2,510 views29 reactions22 Starsread 11 November 2026

Buy gram now, thank me later

😁19custom 52697691066131009516🤩4

8 Nov 2026, 17:31 UTC≈2,590 views42 reactions11 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Что за монета по доллару?

😁41custom 52697691066131009511

6 Nov 2026, 19:07 UTC≈3,300 views42 reactionsread 11 November 2026

В Крыму и Севастополе ввели льготную ипотеку под 8%. Оформить ее можно будет только с 1 ноября 2026 года по 30 апреля 2027 года. Максимальная сумма кредита составит ₽8 миллионов, а льготная ставка будет действовать не более 15 лет.

😁36👍5custom 52697691066131009511

30 Oct 2026, 10:46 UTC≈4,870 views60 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Интересно, что второй октябрь подряд раздают лч, только в прошлом году нужно было держать деньги на бинансе, а в этом где угодно, кроме бинанса. Угадайте, кто вчера решил поменять кош и сидел почти со всеми стейблами залоченными на бинансе?

😁50👍9custom 52697691066131009511

28 Oct 2026, 07:52 UTC≈4,640 views17 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁12🌭4custom 52697691066131009511

23 Oct 2026, 20:12 UTC≈4,980 views30 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Надеюсь арти не серьезно обозлился на приколы. Потому что я не испытываю какого-либо личного негатива ни к кому над кем прикалываюсь, включая колю и ганвеста. Для меня канал и щитпост это некая отдушина, когда я что-то сюда отправляю, то зачастую я искренне надеюсь, что вы тоже улыбнетесь, а не то что субъекту прикола станет обидно и неприятно. Наверное, без канала и аудитории я бы уже ёбнулся. Прикиньте втихую дро…

👍23custom 52697691066131009515🤩2

23 Oct 2026, 19:46 UTC≈3,860 views63 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁56🌭3🤩2custom 52697691066131009512

21 Oct 2026, 12:27 UTC≈3,590 views48 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @rozenshit

Супер очевидный жб шорт был по токену $PREDICT на астере (суплай лярд, качнули до 5$, большая переоценка) коля флипает +330к (ликвид был по 5.2) максим криптоинвест: +117к (ликвиднуло по 4, перезашел на фришные стейблы (то что с оплаты приватки накапало) бума: +500к (хотел лонгануть, случайно перепутал кнопки) никита хедлайнер: +5к (с купленного подкаста в 2024, хз нахуя он это прислал мне, но попросил добавить в по…

😁42🌭3👍2custom 52697691066131009511

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @rozenroom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTCAnonymous Poll461 voters

Что раньше?

  1. BTC = 80K$44%
  2. KOLYA TVS = 80KG56%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Spread Maker | Арбитраж криптовалют
@SpreadMaker · 22,763
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“рума розена” (@rozenroom), 7,235 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rozenroom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.