Channel
@directoire_Z
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
191subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003718791314 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @directoire_Z |
| Created | 13 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/directoire_Z |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 191 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 191 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (13 May 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 84,080 |
| Reactions total | 269 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
426 reactions across 7 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 138 | 32.4% | |
| 👍 | 118 | 27.7% | |
| ❤ | 76 | 17.8% | |
| 🤣 | 27 | 6.34% | |
| 😢 | 20 | 4.69% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 2.11% | |
| 🤡 | 7 | 1.64% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 1.41% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.17% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 0.939% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 0.939% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.939% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.704% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.704% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.235% | |
| 🦄 | 1 | 0.235% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 426reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В последнее время среди российской элиты постепенно проскальзывает компромиссная риторика по поводу топорной кампании цифровых рестрикций. На тему высказываются многие, включая их парламентские партии, руководство Минцифры, и даже президента. При этом сами ограничения никуда не делись или хотя бы временно ослабли — напротив, наблюдается лишь их дополнительное усиление. Получается конкретный парадокс, выражающийся в …
👍3❤2💯2
Это очень хорошо, что президент страны смотрит паблики и блогеров. Без иронии. Только один вопрос — каким образом, на каких платформах? Потому что он либо смотрит мертвые и искусственные отечественные платформы, либо формально запрещенные и заблокированные. Или же ему вообще приносят распечатки и записи со вторых. Что хуже вопрос, наверное, риторический. И пока факт наличия подобного абсурда может быть даже забавны…
💯41🤡5🏆3👎1🤣1
К сожалению, максимально логичное для российской власти продолжение топорной кампании по борьбе с Telegram, выразившееся в уголовном деле против Дурова и внесении его в список террористов и экстремистов Росфинмониторинга, примечательно даже не многочисленными противоречиями, маразмом и абсурдом. Не тем, что вся госуха продолжает плотно сидеть в мессенджере, попутно осваивая гигантские бюджеты на медийное продвижение…
💯61🤣26❤8👏5👎1🤡1😁1😢1
Актуальное состояние российского общества можно сформулировать в качестве затишья перед бурей. Критическая масса накопленных проблем, которые не только не решались, но еще и усугублялись, мотивирует некий кризисный сценарий в ближайшем будущем. Руководство страны, очевидно, стремится хотя бы на время законсервировать своего рода промежуточное состояние, чтобы избежать дальнейшего сползания к пропасти. Однако делать …
👍63❤11👎2🤔1😁1
Бинго рекламы контракта с МО РФ в самый ответственный момент войны за судьбу России: 1) Нейрослоп 2) Замануха на гробовые выплаты будто они просто так 3) Черные пантеры Так победим!
😢13🤯9🤮4❤1😁1
Олега Царева сложно обвинить в малодушии, трусости, наперед синхронном колебании с линией партии. Но его нашумевший текст, хоть и содержа в себе здравые мысли, исходит из заведомо неправильной рамки. Он отмечает, что есть как бы два лагеря. Те, кто устали и хотят конца войны. И те, кто с пеной у рта транслируют шапкозакидательские нарративы а-ля "даешь Киев за три дня", не понимая всю критичность ситуации и не будуч…
👍22❤7🔥4🤡1
Многообещающе продвигаемые праймериз "Единой России" в общем-то показали именно то, что от них ожидали все, кто хоть сколько-нибудь понимает в логике современных номенклатурных процессов в России. Государство действительно, пускай и вскользь, приуменьшая масштаб проблем, проговорило — на фоне многолетнего и тяжелого проведения СВО в обществе созрел острый запрос на крупные перемены. Однако заявленной цели, первого …
❤47💯34👍30😢6🤔5🦄1
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @directoire_Z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 400,439 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Директория” (@directoire_Z), 191 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/directoire_Z.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.