之前的频道太多了!打算从今以后专心经营这一个频道。 也为自己置办了新的域名, 鉴于之前的博客域名无了,计划一切从头开始,用自己做的全新平台写博客,这里写了下心得: https://www.wribb.com/p/428109d8-4460-4d41-bb27-4c4eddb15a81/zh-hans
🔥2

Channel
@dimpublic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
39subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001720857607 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dimpublic |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dimpublic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 39 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 39 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 33.3% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 16.7% | |
| 👻 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 12.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 4.17% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 4.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
之前的频道太多了!打算从今以后专心经营这一个频道。 也为自己置办了新的域名, 鉴于之前的博客域名无了,计划一切从头开始,用自己做的全新平台写博客,这里写了下心得: https://www.wribb.com/p/428109d8-4460-4d41-bb27-4c4eddb15a81/zh-hans
🔥2
Channel photo updated
Channel name was changed to «钉子的频道 PUBLIC»
分享深度好文 by 我自己 https://wribble-web.vercel.app/p/f7957830-9ec7-40ab-8434-1d53881f0f17/zh
🔥1🤣1
濒危数字物种全球比特列表 https://www.dpconline.org/digipres/champion-digital-preservation/bit-list 把各种数字资产(游戏,声音与视觉媒体,研究成果,社交网络,应用程序)等视为物质并划分濒危保护等级的项目,很有趣
最近看档案馆有感,古时候名人的私人收藏,笔记,邮件之类的因为都是纸质很容易被档案馆收藏,并在去世后被家人捐献出去用于研究。现在大家都是网上加密笔记本和邮件,是不是就没法保存了?古人的隐私比较少吗?有谁在致力于保存名人的电子私人数据并公开?
最近一些赛博上电视📺 在香港的朋友欢迎去线下体验改变中的自然:在计算艺术中探索生命数字艺术展
今天在公司创建 release 的时候打到 1120 总感觉好熟悉,想起来两…不,好像是三年前,不对,四年前了!四年前的今天是我给 loj.ac 上线新版系统的日子! 不知不觉 loj.ac 已经在 ng 系统上运行了 4 年了,比运行在 syzoj2 老系统上的时间(2017-04-14 - 2020-11-20)还久了。我还一直觉得新版系统很新,时间过得真快呀… 依稀记得,四年前的今天,朋友来北京准备参加周末的 ICPC 比赛,那天去找他玩,一边在跑数据库的 migration 一边和他一起打音游,晚上吃烤肉的时候,我一边吃还一边在盯着 Azure MariaDB 的资源占用,那天还创造出了《Menci 在打音游》的梗…这些历历在目的事情,完全想象不到已经是四年前了… 从那之后,自己的事情越来越多,如今已经很久没有精力维护 loj.ac 了;毕业工作,来到一个更大的世界,看到了从未见过的景色,OI 的圈子也不再是我唯一…
Photo, posted without a caption
👻3
伦敦地铁偶遇谜之日本节目摄制组,这很伦敦
🤨3
新头像
🥰4🤔1
人总的来说可以有两种软肋,一种是恶的软肋,一种是善的软肋。前者是内心的不足与因此想要得到的事物,例如名誉、财富、地位或者某些具体的价值。后者是想要守护的事物,例如爱人、子女或者某些信念或幻想。 甚爱必大费,对于前者,彻底的放弃是很难的,但是终归可以做到,这就是所谓的无欲则刚,因为其他人再难开除能左右你的价码。但是要“放弃”后者,就到了有些反人性的地步了。针对无法拒绝的交易,可供选择的解法总是很少。
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @dimpublic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,393,792 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“钉子的频道 PUBLIC” (@dimpublic), 39 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dimpublic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.